I can live with the fact you've moved on and you don't suffer from any syndromes. I can't do anything about your difficultly in following my thought process however. I've not moved away from the fact two police investigations into what happened to Madeleine McCann are currently ongoing either. I'm hopeful they conclude their investigations positively but like I said to someone last evening. No theory is ever accepted without overwhelming evidence to support it. If the Mccanns and their very expensive team expect anyone to treat their theory any differently, then their living in cloud cuckoo land imo.
I've seen no overwhelming evidence that supports the whooshing curtain theory.In fact, I've seen nothing of evidential value that supports it at all imo.
I have formed the view that Kate's whooshing curtain performance is evidence against abduction imo. I believe it's one of the worst theatrical performances I'v ever had to witness imo. You'll have to forgive my honesty, but I say it the way I see it.
Logic dictates the physical impossibility of Kate and Gerry or any of their friends contriving the vanishing of a child.
Amaral has lurched from one ridiculous scenario to another in the attempt and neither has anyone else come up with a viable solution despite having twelve years to mull it over. If you've got one it might deserve serious consideration ... but in the absence of a working model of how it was done, pontificating about something which has never worried either the Judicial police or Scotland Yard really doesn't hold much water.
One of the first things Rebelo did when he took over the investigation was an in depth personal inspection of the apartment window ... one of the photographs of which clearly shows ... a whooshing curtain.