Oh FGS - cant you see isn't it obvious
They are not fitting him to the crime DNA/evidence - they are trying to fit the crime to him with hearsay circum.
Why is it all being played out publicly they have got their man - but no proof not enough to charge him?
No wonder Scapegoat springs to mind IMO
I've been saying for years that Amaral tried to twist the evidence to suit what he thought was the crime.
It isn't very nice is it ... but good to see you have finally caught up with me there.
The only difference I can see is that Madeleine's parents are law abiding folk who were set up by Amaral and Cristovao in the press without evidence or proof ... whereas Brueckner is a time served and presently serving criminal with quite a long rap sheet.
Brueckner is a burglar and a paedophile who was active in Luz and whose phone places him there on the night Madeleine was lifted. It now appears from what he is saying that Amaral knew about this at the time ???