« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 201 202 [203] 204 205 ... 391   Go Down

Author Topic: Goncalo Amaral.  (Read 408882 times)

0 Members and 4 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3030 on: August 19, 2020, 07:19:40 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on August 19, 2020, 07:18:29 PM
Big difference. No comments on one.

do you understand interview under caution and its implications
Logged

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3031 on: August 19, 2020, 07:31:19 PM »
Quote from: Davel on August 19, 2020, 07:17:29 PM
second lesson...can you give us a copy of Rainbows report

I don't need to read his report to conclude that the last witness not knowing which door he used to enter and other facts like changing his story about his friend are discrepancies that should be investigated. The more you dig the more you find.
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3032 on: August 19, 2020, 07:35:29 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on August 19, 2020, 07:31:19 PM
I don't need to read his report to conclude that the last witness not knowing which door he used to enter and other facts like changing his story about his friend are discrepancies that should be investigated. The more you dig the more you find.

Yes what you find is the PJ were rubbish at taking statements...and...none of those statements are admissible evidence against the McCanns because they were not made under caution

second...you have never seen his report by rainbow so dont have aclue what it contains...
Logged

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3033 on: August 19, 2020, 07:39:27 PM »
Quote from: Davel on August 19, 2020, 07:19:40 PM
do you understand interview under caution and its implications

Christopher Jefferies answered every question because he knew he was innocent!
Logged
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3034 on: August 19, 2020, 07:41:01 PM »
Quote from: pathfinder73 on August 19, 2020, 07:39:27 PM
Christopher Jefferies answered every question because he knew he was innocent!

colin stagg didnt because he knew the police were trying to stich him up..

CB has already said he wont answer any
Logged

Offline faithlilly

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3035 on: August 19, 2020, 11:23:14 PM »
Quote from: Davel on August 19, 2020, 07:41:01 PM
colin stagg didnt because he knew the police were trying to stich him up..

CB has already said he wont answer any

Interesting you mention Colin Stagg...the prime suspect in a horrific murder for months yet was entirely innocent of the crime. Much, I suspect, like Brueckner.
Logged
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3036 on: August 19, 2020, 11:28:11 PM »
Kate McCann refuses to answer police questions = suspicious
Colin Stagg refuses to answer police questions = entirely innocent

Go figure!
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline carlymichelle

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3037 on: August 19, 2020, 11:30:24 PM »
Quote from: Faithlilly on August 19, 2020, 11:23:14 PM
Interesting you mention Colin Stagg...the prime suspect in a horrific murder for months yet was entirely innocent of the crime. Much, I suspect, like Brueckner.
isnt it intresting that supporters believe the mcanns  every word  but they  call the   PJ amaral and Brueckner liars??   or accuse them of things they may  not of done  a  bit hypocritical much??.....
Logged

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3038 on: August 20, 2020, 12:00:12 AM »
Quote from: carlymichelle on August 19, 2020, 11:30:24 PM
isnt it intresting that supporters believe the mcanns  every word  but they  call the   PJ amaral and Brueckner liars??   or accuse them of things they may  not of done  a  bit hypocritical much??.....
Yes, how dare we not believe a convicted liar and a paedo/rapist , we should of course believe every word they say based on their combined track records of honesty and decency.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline G-Unit

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3039 on: August 20, 2020, 07:54:38 AM »
Quote from: Vertigo Swirl on August 20, 2020, 12:00:12 AM
Yes, how dare we not believe a convicted liar and a paedo/rapist , we should of course believe every word they say based on their combined track records of honesty and decency.

Give a dog a bad name and hang him.
Logged
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3040 on: August 20, 2020, 07:56:42 AM »
Quote from: G-Unit on August 20, 2020, 07:54:38 AM
Give a dog a bad name and hang him.

Its called evidence..

You are supporting the paedophile/rapists reputaion it seems...why ?

They have both earnt their names by their own actions
« Last Edit: August 20, 2020, 07:59:51 AM by Davel »
Logged

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3041 on: August 20, 2020, 08:08:45 AM »
Quote from: G-Unit on August 20, 2020, 07:54:38 AM
Give a dog a bad name and hang him.
No one gave Amaral or Bruckner a bad name, they earned it all by themselves.
« Last Edit: August 20, 2020, 08:19:01 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3042 on: August 20, 2020, 08:09:03 AM »
Quote from: Davel on August 20, 2020, 07:56:42 AM
Its called evidence..

You are supporting the paedophile/rapists reputaion it seems...why ?

They have both earnt their names by their own actions
Snap!
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3043 on: August 20, 2020, 08:20:27 AM »
Quote from: G-Unit on August 20, 2020, 07:54:38 AM
Give a dog a bad name and hang him.

Whats unfair about referring to amaral as a convicted liar...he is

Breukner....a paedophile/rapist...he is
Logged

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Goncalo Amaral.
« Reply #3044 on: August 20, 2020, 09:18:00 AM »
Quote from: Davel on August 20, 2020, 08:20:27 AM
Whats unfair about referring to amaral as a convicted liar...he is

Breukner....a paedophile/rapist...he is
According to some it's unfair to call them dishonest.  Hard to believe but there you go.
Logged
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly
Pages: 1 ... 201 202 [203] 204 205 ... 391   Go Up
« previous next »