Well good for you.
Me personally, I'm not convinced Maddie was abducted.
Do you know of any evidence that she actually was, other than, because the McCanns said so & SY said so, & Wolters said so, & Brueckner said so?
Any abduction evidence other than that spring to mind?
Yep, various sightings.
1) In Malta 29 sightings !!! Why is nobody looking at them? I wonder why?
2) Then 3 sightings in druggie places:
- Zinat in the Rif Mountains of Morocco, where half the worlds hemp is/was grown, Madeleine was being carried on the back of a man. The man is dressed as a woman. Joana Cipriano appears to be there as well, walking just ahead of the group.
- Walking around the bank at Molenbeek St John. Brussels. This is where the hemp from the Rif is processed to change it into various narcotics and then distributed around the world. Madeleine was accompanied by a 'nanny' who appeared to be Moroccan.
She was wearing a quality scottish kilt that had the colours of my suspects clan in it. Also wearing a lovely Arran sweater, Very Scottish. Was she being dressed as a child of an important member/ leader of the clan? Dunno.
- An American and a British couple sighted Madeleine in Leh, which is on the old trading routes, high up in the Himalayas. It is also the place where 80% of Indias Hashish enters the country.
I find it very interesting that Madeleine was sighted at three main drug/narcotics centres, but seems that the PJ ignored these sightings. I wonder why?
And of course, this might link the druggies to Brueckner. There is a possibility which should be explored. And that is all there is IMO; just a possibility. No more.
But why didn't Amaral explore any of these sightings as the main drugs Officer?
Maybe he had left the PJ by then, but even as a retired officer, surely he would have wanted to draw the PJ's Officials attention to the situation ? Why didn't he?