Goncalo Amaral.

[jassi]

I'm sorry but what is Brueckner's phone data supposed to indicate exactly?
What is it evidence of? That he recieved a half hour phone call? Well, that's not much evidence of anything really is it, other than that someone phoned him really.

If it could be positively linked to CB, the only thing it would be evidence of would be his presence withing the general environs of PDL before Madeleine went missing  - along with several hundred  other people.

[Wonderfulspam]

If it could be positively linked to CB, the only thing it would be evidence of would be his presence withing the general environs of PDL before Madeleine went missing  - along with several hundred  other people.

...and he did happen to live there, so it's not unreasonable for him to own & use a phone really, I'd have thought. Perhaps.

[barrier]

If it could be positively linked to CB, the only thing it would be evidence of would be his presence withing the general environs of PDL before Madeleine went missing  - along with several hundred  other people.

Including the three amigos Grange went after .

[jassi]

...and he did happen to live there, so it's not unreasonable for him to own & use a phone really, I'd have thought. Perhaps.

I think that could be a stumbling block as he had every right to be there.
 Without a transcript of the conversation, I can't see the existence of a call being of much use.

[G-Unit]

Topic: Amaral's body in a fridge theory common to both Joana and Madeleine?
Does anyone think its strange how two little girls go missing ...and Amaral chose the same body in a fridge theory ...?
Reference to the Joana Cipriano and Madeleine McCann cases.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?PHPSESSID=tktdtq3k9vq3837iaju2on29j6&topic=2898.msg100652#msg100652

There is a lot that Amaral manged to convince himself about and all without a shred of supporting evidence to back his notions up.

The fridge was a bit of a cause celebre thing for a time.  All utter nonsense of course.  But when in the process of ignoring real evidence - such as Brueckner's phone pings - while making a story up as you go along is really just the pits.

By the way - the evidence presented regarding the open window and the raised shutters came from an eye witness who was present at the time.
Amaral wasn't there.
In contradicting eye witness testimony and calling the witness a liar you are libelling her.  Do have a care about that!

I said Amaral wasn't convinced by the tale of the open window and shutters.

Then, at 10pm, Madeleine's mother goes in her turn into the bedroom, she sees the open
window, the raised shutters and the curtains waving in the breeze. This scenario is
highly improbable, since the shutters cannot be operated from the outside. Normally,
that window is never opened, she says, but she can't say either if it was locked. This
vagueness perhaps serves the interests of the witnesses, but arouses the suspicions of the
investigators.
TOTL page 22

As I was reporting Amaral's conclusions, not mine, I am libelling no-one.

[kizzy]

Topic: Amaral's body in a fridge theory common to both Joana and Madeleine?
Does anyone think its strange how two little girls go missing ...and Amaral chose the same body in a fridge theory ...?
Reference to the Joana Cipriano and Madeleine McCann cases.
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?PHPSESSID=tktdtq3k9vq3837iaju2on29j6&topic=2898.msg100652#msg100652

There is a lot that Amaral manged to convince himself about and all without a shred of supporting evidence to back his notions up.

The fridge was a bit of a cause celebre thing for a time.  All utter nonsense of course.  But when in the process of ignoring real evidence - such as Brueckner's phone pings - while making a story up as you go along is really just the pits.

By the way - the evidence presented regarding the open window and the raised shutters came from an eye witness who was present at the time.
Amaral wasn't there.
In contradicting eye witness testimony and calling the witness a liar you are libelling her.  Do have a care about that!

By the way. So what was the point of leaving a window wide open ..looking out of it and leaving it open when twins were still inside?

Then closing it when she had returned from the tapas bar - destroying any evidence or photo graphs being taken

[Brietta]

Including the three amigos Grange went after .

The "three amigos" were questioned under caution.  Apparently they were burglars and their phones were active in Luz around the time Madeleine disappeared.

The questions which should present themselves are

• why did no-one bother to eliminate them from the inquiry in 2007
• why did it have to wait until Scotland Yard took over the investigation before these men were questioned in 2014
• apart from these three and Euclides Monteiro  - how many other criminals with known profiles including child abuse owned a phone which activated antennae in Luz on May 3 2007

[Brietta]

I said Amaral wasn't convinced by the tale of the open window and shutters.

Then, at 10pm, Madeleine's mother goes in her turn into the bedroom, she sees the open
window, the raised shutters and the curtains waving in the breeze. This scenario is
highly improbable, since the shutters cannot be operated from the outside. Normally,
that window is never opened, she says, but she can't say either if it was locked. This
vagueness perhaps serves the interests of the witnesses, but arouses the suspicions of the
investigators.
TOTL page 22

As I was reporting Amaral's conclusions, not mine, I am libelling no-one.

Please allow me to remind you that you are posting on a British based forum where many of Amaral's "conclusions" are libellous.

[G-Unit]

Please allow me to remind you that you are posting on a British based forum where many of Amaral's "conclusions" are libellous.

In your opinion, but not that of the ECHR.

[Brietta]

In your opinion, but not that of the ECHR.

The thing is though - I can differentiate between what is fact and what is fiction.

Amaral states on national tv and numerous interviews, that at the time of Madeleine's disappearance - Brueckner sported a dreadlock hairstyle.

Which is a lie.

Amaral just cannot help himself from lying.  Even going to the extent of fabricating a photoshop image to back up his lie.

[Wonderfulspam]

The "three amigos" were questioned under caution.  Apparently they were burglars and their phones were active in Luz around the time Madeleine disappeared.

The questions which should present themselves are

• why did no-one bother to eliminate them from the inquiry in 2007
• why did it have to wait until Scotland Yard took over the investigation before these men were questioned in 2014
• apart from these three and Euclides Monteiro  - how many other criminals with known profiles including child abuse owned a phone which activated antennae in Luz on May 3 2007

Why did no-one bother to eliminate them from the inquiry in 2007?

Because there was nothing to actually rule them in. They were nicking wallets & phones, not children.

Why did it have to wait until Scotland Yard took over the investigation before these men were questioned in 2014?

Because there wasn't any point in investigating them anyway. They were burglars, not child abductors.

Apart from these three and Euclides Monteiro  - how many other criminals with known profiles including child abuse owned a phone which activated antennae in Luz on May 3 2007?

I'm not really sure what difference this makes to anything. Receiving a half hour phone call isn't evidence of child abduction I'm afraid.

[Wonderfulspam]

The thing is though - I can differentiate between what is fact and what is fiction.

Amaral states on national tv and numerous interviews, that at the time of Madeleine's disappearance - Brueckner sported a dreadlock hairstyle.

Which is a lie.

Amaral just cannot help himself from lying.  Even going to the extent of fabricating a photoshop image to back up his lie.

Yeah, but he could still be right about the faked abduction though. It's up to Wolters to prove him wrong, & that won't be happening any time soon. I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned that before.

[barrier]

The "three amigos" were questioned under caution.  Apparently they were burglars and their phones were active in Luz around the time Madeleine disappeared.

The questions which should present themselves are

• why did no-one bother to eliminate them from the inquiry in 2007
• why did it have to wait until Scotland Yard took over the investigation before these men were questioned in 2014
• apart from these three and Euclides Monteiro  - how many other criminals with known profiles including child abuse owned a phone which activated antennae in Luz on May 3 2007

Shock, horror , people who live in Luz use phones in Luz.

[barrier]

The "three amigos" were questioned under caution.  Apparently they were burglars and their phones were active in Luz around the time Madeleine disappeared.

The questions which should present themselves are

• why did no-one bother to eliminate them from the inquiry in 2007
• why did it have to wait until Scotland Yard took over the investigation before these men were questioned in 2014
• apart from these three and Euclides Monteiro  - how many other criminals with known profiles including child abuse owned a phone which activated antennae in Luz on May 3 2007

Strangely their paths never crossed what with CB supposedly a prolific burglar .

[G-Unit]

The thing is though - I can differentiate between what is fact and what is fiction.

Amaral states on national tv and numerous interviews, that at the time of Madeleine's disappearance - Brueckner sported a dreadlock hairstyle.

Which is a lie.

Amaral just cannot help himself from lying.  Even going to the extent of fabricating a photoshop image to back up his lie.

Well then you know that the contents of Amaral's book are not libellous using the standards of the ECHR.