(4): DI Karen Thomas
Is she the same as Andrew "Civilian Mott"?? I'm being to wonder how many "Civilians" were used in this case and attended trial to give testimony....
Are you just a "Civilian" Karen?? Not a warranted Police Officer ??
He gave three statements to police – one on December 31 in Amsterdam, one on January 20 and another on January 22.
All were ‘’false and dishonest accounts’’, the court heard.
When asked about his movements the night Jo died, he said he’d gone to take pictures of the snow after returning from work.
Now we know you went to Amsterdam with a Colleague... I'm guessing this Colleague was a real 'Copper"!!
I say this because ....
Also giving evidence was Detective Constable Karen Thomas, who spoke to Tabak in Holland on New Year's Eve.
Thomas said Tabak told her he had been out twice on the night Yeates vanished – which he had not said when she interviewed him a week earlier.
Tabak was "overly interested" in the forensic examination of Yeates's flat, Thomas said, and she asked him to provide a sample of DNA and fingerprinted him.
The trial continues.
Now was the 6 hour Interview you conducted actually one continuous Interview with Dr Vincent Tabak?
Or... Did you Interview someone else in Holland for 6 hours?? See we don't know... was it the boy with the 2 sisters and one brother whom you interviewed in Holland for 6 hours, and not Dr Vincent Tabak whom has 3 sisters and one brother...?? Therefore not needing the cooperation of the Dutch Authorities for this Interview...
The week before when you Interviewed Dr Vincent Tabak, you didn't take a statement?? or are you not able to take a statement??? Because as we see Dr Vincent Tabak apparently only ever gave 3 statements...
On December 31 in Amsterdam, one on January 20 and another on January 22. So how did he give you a statement the week before Amsterdam being the 26th December 2010?? Or are you talking about someone else who gave you a statement on that day..??
Eh?? Can't hear you...
You phoned him too... Does that not count... Was he just silent on the phone??? CJ said that all of the tenants gave a statement.... Well I'll go back to the idea that Dr Vincent Tabak wasn't a tenant but a landlord! Was Dr Vincent Tabak actually at Canygne Road when all of this took place??? I'm begining to wonder...
Had Dr Vincent Tabak been renting out his property on Canygne Road?? Was Dr Vincent Tabak even at Canygne Road on the 17th December 2010?? Come on Karen just a couple of questions please...
All were ‘’false and dishonest accounts’’, the court heard. Interesting that statement.. Did these statements get read out at trial???
Don't think so.. So how do we know that they were "false and Dishonest"... "Because someone said so"!!... They very well might be if he said what i think he said in his 3rd witness statement!!
I thought Dr Vincent Tabak said "No Comment" through out... So where is the evidence to support that these statements he apparently made on those 3 dates were 'false and dishonest"??
Explain to me how "No Comment" is false and dishonest..... Or if he did speak... where are these statements??
So Karen Thomas... Are you a fully fledged proper copper?? Or just a "Civilian" like Andrew "Civilian " Mott!!
The account on the 22nd January 2011, the day you charged Dr Vincent Tabak, without any evidence whatsoever,
was this the day that Dr Vincent Tabak turned around and said... OK.. I killed her, just to shut you all up from your incessant questioning?? He had got bored with you all asking stupid questions that had no relevance to him!! And you ran with it??? Is that what happened?? and because of that he was charged...
Maybe the important statement of Dr Vincent Tabak is actually the 22nd January 2011, because we know you didn't have any evidence with which to charge him with.. That all would have come to court and it didn't!!
https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/oct/17/vincent-tabak-held-jo-yeates-throathttps://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jo-yeates-murder-trial-jury-84889