The Picture That Bamber Ripped Up

[Venturi Swirl]

I'd have put money on it being you who'd question it authenticity.

Of course it will all be a set up, as if poor, wee, sweet, innocent Jeremy would do such a hateful thing - it’s just such bad luck for him that all his relatives were evil, plotting, psychos!

[G-Unit]

I'd have put money on it being you who'd question it authenticity.

What's wrong with asking for details? Someone searched for it, found it, and released it so people can post it on here. Who did that?

[APRIL]

What's wrong with asking for details? Someone searched for it, found it, and released it so people can post it on here. Who did that?

Absolutely nothing, G-Unit. It's how we learn. Unfortunately, when you pose those questions to Jeremy's detractors, you make it sound as if you're trying to "catch them out" as opposed to wanting to learn something from the answer.

[Brietta]

What's wrong with asking for details? Someone searched for it, found it, and released it so people can post it on here. Who did that?

Maybe someone who corresponds with Bamber could ask him why he hasn't challenged the torn up photograph mention in Carol Ann Lee's book?

[G-Unit]

Maybe someone who corresponds with Bamber could ask him why he hasn't challenged the torn up photograph mention in Carol Ann Lee's book?

Maybe they could, but let's find out first;

Who found it.
What they did with it.
Who released it.
How they knew it was him who ripped the photo up.

[APRIL]

Maybe they could, but let's find out first;

Who found it.
What they did with it.
Who released it.
How they knew it was him who ripped the photo up.

If we look at "who" -other than Jeremy- it may have been, might it not have crossed their mind to think Colin would like to have it? It seems to me that more emotion, than logic, is behind destroying a picture of murdered children, rather than offering it to their father. If you're determined that it was someone, other than Jeremy, I guess it would most likely be Colin, but it's always possible that there are little green men on the moon.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

For the doubting Thomas's

Heartbreaking

And how happy they look 😔

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Maybe someone who corresponds with Bamber could ask him why he hasn't challenged the torn up photograph mention in Carol Ann Lee's book?

Good point, Brietta!

He would be denying that like hell

Then again, he avoids mentioning the twins — he doesn’t like to remind his supporters that he killed two little boys

[Venturi Swirl]

If we look at "who" -other than Jeremy- it may have been, might it not have crossed their mind to think Colin would like to have it? It seems to me that more emotion, than logic, is behind destroying a picture of murdered children, rather than offering it to their father. If you're determined that it was someone, other than Jeremy, I guess it would most likely be Colin, but it's always possible that there are little green men on the moon.

Yeah, it was probably Colin who ripped up a picture of his murdered little boys in the hopes that someone would find it and blame Jeremy for it.  It couldn’t possibly have been Jeremy, he’s far too saintly for such repulsive behaviour.

[APRIL]

Yeah, it was probably Colin who ripped up a picture of his murdered little boys in the hopes that someone would find it and blame Jeremy for it.  It couldn’t possibly have been Jeremy, he’s far too saintly for such repulsive behaviour.

VS, I'm humbled. You're understanding astounds me

[Caroline]

Maybe they could, but let's find out first;

Who found it.
What they did with it.
Who released it.
How they knew it was him who ripped the photo up.

Are you STILL making excuses? 

The picture is readily available in Roger Wilkes's book - that's why it's always better to read more than just one!

[Caroline]

I'd have put money on it being you who'd question it authenticity.

Me too, yesterday there was a big question about the story being made up and the picture not existing, now that there is proof that it does, another excuse appears. 

[G-Unit]

Are you STILL making excuses? 

The picture is readily available in Roger Wilkes's book - that's why it's always better to read more than just one!

Did you copy it from there? How did he get it?

[Caroline]

Did you copy it from there? How did he get it?

Where do you think I got it from? Of course! Why don't you email him and ask him instead of asking me - I wasn't involved in writing of his book. It wouldn't make any difference though, you're hell bent on finding excuses for Bamber no matter what evidence ends up under you nose.

[G-Unit]

Where do you think I got it from? Of course! Why don't you email him and ask him instead of asking me - I wasn't involved in writing of his book. It wouldn't make any difference though, you're hell bent on finding excuses for Bamber no matter what evidence ends up under you nose.

It rather depends what counts as evidence. I acknowledge evidence which is supported by cites, which Mr Wilkes doesn't provide. Why should his word be believed?