Author Topic: Amaral and the dogs  (Read 844109 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4740 on: September 01, 2015, 09:44:20 AM »
Kate has been close to six bodies in last two weeks at work



 

TimesOnline 10.09.2007


Mrs McCann is reported to have explained that in her work as locum GPshe came into contact with six corpses in the weeks leading up to Algarve holiday.

"Reported to have explained."  TimesOnLine.

Which paper was it that has lately been forced to issue a retraction, and paid a sum of money for the lie?

Offline carol

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4741 on: September 01, 2015, 09:47:48 AM »
Depends on the job really. No way would  Kate McCann be wearing those check pyjama bottoms for signing death certificates or whatever. Hardly professional. I used to wear skirts and jackets for work and the first thing I did before my  holiday started   was put them aside for the cleaning specialists before getting out my 'real' clothes to party.

Offline Benice

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4742 on: September 01, 2015, 09:48:12 AM »
Kate has been close to six bodies in last two weeks at work



 

TimesOnline 10.09.2007


Mrs McCann is reported to have explained that in her work as locum GPshe came into contact with six corpses in the weeks leading up to Algarve holiday.

Reported by whom?  There is no record that Kate made any such statement in the files.

Your article is from 2007 - when all manner of lies, myths and rubbish were regularly being spouted in the press.

The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline carol

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4743 on: September 01, 2015, 09:50:53 AM »
Your article is from 2007 - when all manner of lies, myths and rubbish were regularly being spouted in the pres.s

So you keep telling us.

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4744 on: September 01, 2015, 09:52:16 AM »
That was not the case with my son.

Both doctors came in independantly, but no gloves were worn.

The one doctor was a neighbour, not our usual doctor, but from our practice.  The other doctor was a friend of his and of us.  The first doctor called him in, cos two were needed.


As far as I am aware neither had any links with an undertaker.
People are dying in their own homes all the time.  Such is life .... and doctors have to verify they are dead.


Kate could have been to one such unhappy happening in the days before they came on holiday. 
It only takes one to pass the cadavar scent on.


But we dont know.

Should have been easy to prove.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline Carana

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4745 on: September 01, 2015, 09:53:07 AM »
Does anyone know when Cristovao's book was published?

Sorry, Off Topic but the knowledge might help.

March 2008

http://galaxiadoslivros.blogspot.com/2011/01/paulo-pereira-cristovao.html

Offline slartibartfast

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4746 on: September 01, 2015, 09:54:23 AM »
Should have been easy to prove.

...and of course given sufficient time for the scent to develop.
“Reasoning will never make a Man correct an ill Opinion, which by Reasoning he never acquired”.

Offline carol

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4747 on: September 01, 2015, 09:57:31 AM »
"Reported to have explained."  TimesOnLine.

Which paper was it that has lately been forced to issue a retraction, and paid a sum of money for the lie?

Yes strange that.
The parents of missing child Madeleine McCann have sued The Sunday Times for libel over a story which they said gave the impression they had hindered the investigation into her disappearance.
However they DIDN'T  sue over the supposed lies and myths spouted by the Times Online over the six dead bodies. They missed an opportunity there!

Offline Carana

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4748 on: September 01, 2015, 10:02:03 AM »
Yes strange that.
The parents of missing child Madeleine McCann have sued The Sunday Times for libel over a story which they said gave the impression they had hindered the investigation into her disappearance.
However they DIDN'T  sue over the supposed lies and myths spouted by the Times Online over the six dead bodies. They missed an opportunity there!

Why would printing that be libellous, even if it's inaccurate?


Offline Benice

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4749 on: September 01, 2015, 10:03:17 AM »
Depends on the job really. No way would  Kate McCann be wearing those check pyjama bottoms for signing death certificates or whatever. Hardly professional. I used to wear skirts and jackets for work and the first thing I did before my  holiday started   was put them aside for the cleaning specialists before getting out my 'real' clothes to party.

If Kate went home with hands contaminated with cadaverscent, she would have no need to be wearing those trousers - as cross contamination could have taken place later.

According to Martin Grime - cleaning/washing does not remove the scent and cross contamination is instant.

Anyway - AFAIK Kate has never made any claims on the subject - so what other people unconnected with the case have claimed  - are at best uncorroborated 'opinions' and at worst ' fabrications' IMO.    Whichever they are -  they are irrelevant to the case imo.


The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4750 on: September 01, 2015, 10:08:07 AM »
Yes strange that.
The parents of missing child Madeleine McCann have sued The Sunday Times for libel over a story which they said gave the impression they had hindered the investigation into her disappearance.
However they DIDN'T  sue over the supposed lies and myths spouted by the Times Online over the six dead bodies. They missed an opportunity there!

If you read the law re libel you will understand why they couldn't sue

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4751 on: September 01, 2015, 10:21:42 AM »

Offline Eleanor

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4752 on: September 01, 2015, 10:22:21 AM »
Should have been easy to prove.

Why would it have been necessary?

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4753 on: September 01, 2015, 10:37:13 AM »
Now if not from the Mccanns or their 'sources', where would the claim of Kate Mccann seeing 6 bodies come from ?


Offline Carana

Re: Amaral and the dogs
« Reply #4754 on: September 01, 2015, 10:43:03 AM »
So he hadn't read The Files then.  Or had he?

He stated that his sources were conversations with police officers and the media. Some aspects do correspond to the general thinking of Amaral & co., and some more or less accurate details, but others must be gleaned from mangled tabloid reports of half-truths, in themselves largely initially leaked by the PJ anyway.