just more clutching at straws in an attempt to make a guilty man innocent. Its never gonna happen! As for the comments about why should he have got charged for the indecent images, I find that totally disgusting
I was thinking about this yesterday oddly enough, in the middle of shopping....
When was Dr Vincent Tabak actually charged for the images??
Jo Yeates' murderer Vincent Tabak had child porn on his laptopVINCENT Tabak had sick images on his laptop showing children being sexually abused, police have revealed.
ByMirror.Co.Uk
17:14, 1 NOV 2011UPDATED19:10, 12 MAR 2012
VINCENT Tabak had sick images on his laptop showing children being sexually abused, police have revealed.
The 33-year-old killer was jailed for life on Friday after a jury found him guilty of throttling 25-year-old architect Joanna Yeates in Bristol.
Following his conviction it was revealed that the Dutch engineer was obsessed with images of women being strangled during sex and had perversions for violent pornography and prostitutes.
It also came to light that Tabak faced further questioning by police relating to material discovered on the hard drives of computers he used.
It has now been reported that Avon and Somerset Police discovered 30 images of youngsters being sexually abused.
The 30 images I had also noticed the other day:
Mark Williams-Thomas
Verified account
@mwilliamsthomas
Following Following @mwilliamsthomas
More
Jo Yeates killer: 30 images of child sexually abused were found on Tabak’s computer 2 yrs ago- just investigated now http://mirr.im/1dH6glP
9:01 AM - 17 Nov 2013
The link that MWT has made doesn't exist.... strange....
Police find 30 sick images of child porn on murderer Vincent Tabak's laptopAll the images showed sexual activity between an adult and a child - the second worst kind of child porn
By LUKE SALKELD FOR THE DAILY MAIL
UPDATED: 00:03, 2 November 2011
Vincent Tabak kept a hoard of child pornography on his laptop, it emerged yesterday.
Joanna Yeates’s murderer was found to have a stash of up to 30 images of children being abused, according to a police source.
The 33-year-old Dutchman is already known to have been obsessed with pornographic images of women being strangled and abused.
So 3 sources saying 30 images... The Daily Mail having updated said article, which originally was published on the 1st November 2011 according to the google entry..
Vincent Tabak child porn: Police found 30 sick images on murderer's ...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Vincent-Tabak-child-porn-Police-30-sick-images-murder...
1 Nov 2011 - He said: 'During the examination of Vincent Tabak's computer, other material was found. We have referred this matter to the Crown Prosecution Service for initial ...
For years the amount of images has changed.... I originally believe I had read it was in the region of 40ish, then by the time he appeared at court it had jumped to around 140ish....
The problem I had yesterday, was I was trying to understand when they actually charged Dr Vincent Tabak... Did they charge him before the trial for instance??
Did they charge him immediately after the trial??
When was he actually charged??
If it was a live investigation, how on earth did the details appear in the media before a court case had taken place??
How did the media have the information and the type of images that apparently were on Dr Vincent Tabak's laptops??
I find it rather strange that MTW has the same amount of images in his tweet two years later, and that the link he provides no longer exists...
It still begs the question how they all were given this information... again.. MWT
Mark Williams-Thomas
Verified account
@mwilliamsthomas
Vincent Tabak should def be prosecuted for making child abuse images - It is in the publics interest & vital for future Risk Management
12:57 PM - 1 Nov 2011
He has published on the same day as the media, a tweet about Dr Vincent Tabak "making" child abuse images.... How have these 3 sources been given such information, before a thorough investigation into the welfare of these children has been established??
How does anyone know this information.... I thought that it was just the apparent porn that was not allowed at trial, the child images are a seperate issue and I cannot understand how within a couple of days of Dr Vincent Tabak being found guilty, this information has been made public....
Wouldn't such information stop people coming forward?? Wouldn't these apparent childrens parents not want a proper investigation to take place... Would the parents want to know that this info was going to be leaked??
It appears that it is only when someone is famous/infamous that their names are published in the media, before the facts have been established, before charges have been laid against said accused...
I'll go back to this from The Daily mail..
All the images showed sexual activity between an adult and a child - the second worst kind of child pornThat suggests that Dr Vincent Tabak photographed these images (imo) But we then look MTW's statement
Vincent Tabak should def be prosecuted for making child abuse images - It is in the publics interest & vital for future Risk Management
He states making images also..... But because The Daily Mail changed there time and date on the article, what time they posted said article online... Who is giving who information?? I have no idea...
But.....
Vincent Tabak should def be prosecuted for making child abuse images - It is in the publics interest & vital for future Risk Management
12:57 PM - 1 Nov 2011The tweet from MTW is posted at 12:57 pm on 1st November 2010
And... The Mirror's originally posted:
VINCENT Tabak had sick images on his laptop showing children being sexually abused, police have revealed.
ByMirror.Co.Uk
17:14, 1 NOV 2011UPDATED19:10, 12 MAR 2012
The Mirror originally posted at 17:14 1st November 2011
Leaving me not knowing the time The Daily Mails article was posted on the same day.... I have said many times before , who is the original source??
As I have stated... why has this info been released before any risk management of the children involved was assessed??
Was someone hoping that a barrage of people would come forward to accuse Dr Vincent Tabak of something untoward??
There has been many people who over the years have capitalised on making accusations, Dr Vincent Tabak would be an easy target for those who knew of his charges and apparent likes.... But we never heard of anyone coming forward in relation to Dr Vincent Tabak about anything.... Not even for his original trial in October 2011...
It takes the Police until 2015 to take Dr Vincent Tabak to court for these images.... and again we just get a guilty plea...
From The Guardian 2015:
Vincent Tabak admits possessing indecent images of childrenJoanna Yeates’s killer pleads guilty to four charges at Bristol crown court over images found on his laptop
Press Association
Mon 2 Mar 2015 17.51 GMT Last modified on Wed 29 Nov 2017 22.31 GMT
Tabak, dressed in a black suit, white shirt and blue tie, was flanked by five security officers in the dock as he entered guilty pleas to the four charges. He admitted four counts of possessing indecent images of children on his laptop between January 2009 and 2011. The charges relate to 145 images, the majority of which are classed at the lowest category in terms of seriousness. Two counts of making indecent photographs between 2009 and 2011, relating to 23 images found on external hard drives, were ordered to lie on file.
Opening the case for the prosecution, David Bartlett said detectives discovered the images after examining Tabak’s laptop in 2011. “This case concerns 145 indecent images,” Bartlett said. “All of which were found on the laptop computer of this defendant which was seized on 20 January 2011. On that occasion he was arrested and cautioned and the Dell laptop was seized.”
Bartlett said the majority of images related to two teenage girls of “relative maturity” and were in the least serious category. “But some of the most serious category are not, they are of pre-pubescent girls,” he added.
Bartlett said Tabak had been interviewed in prison in March 2012 but refused to answer any questions. “He said there had been such serious leakages in information that he couldn’t have a fair trial and he couldn’t trust the security and integrity of information that he gave to the police,” Bartlett said.
This article states that Dr Vincent Tabak was not interviewed until March 2012 yet we have 3 sources giving us this information in November 2011
Again Dr Vincent Tabak has refused to answer any questions, we know nothing of how his laptop was processed, we know nothing of the chain of command.... we know nothing of whom analysed this laptop....
This is amongst the reasons I have questioned the validity of the purported images on Dr Vincent Tabak's laptop.... the dates are between 2009-2011... who had access to this laptop between this time....
Tanja Morson also used this laptop... did she not stumble across these images?? Who else could have had access in those years??
I will say Jixy, the charges for the child images have always struck me as odd... taking 4 years plus to actually take him to court for this crime, an unusual length of time for a man sat in prison doing nothing... And we not knowing the actual date of the original charge for this crime..
The amount of images changing also has struck me as odd.... But not as odd as the whole case against Dr Vincent Tabak...
Just looking again at The guardian article...
Temporary assistant chief constable Julian Moss, of Avon and Somerset police, said it was “crucial” that Tabak was brought to justice for possessing the images. “Vincent Tabak is a dangerous, calculating and manipulative offender who is already serving a life sentence for the murder of Joanna Yeates,” Moss said. “During the course of the investigation into Joanna’s murder, indecent images of children were found on Tabak’s laptop. These offences did not form part of the initial murder trial.
This has me again questioning how these 3 sources had the information about the apparent images on Dr Vincent Tabak's laptop?? If during the course of the Investigation these offences didn't form part of the initial trial...
Maybe the sources are the ones who need to answer questions about how they came across this information, before any questioning or charges were brought against Dr Vincent Tabak... (imo)
I have been confused as to how this had always unfolded in the media before any protection measures could be put in place for the children that had been exposed..
Just like the trial, I have questioned the validity of these charges... It's easy to make a monster out of someone after the fact and that secures in the public's mind the monster that everyone wants to believe Dr Vincent Tabak is ...
It sealed everyones belief after trial that the must have had the right man for the crime....
I will question and if I am proved wrong , so be it... But the original trial has never sat right with me, so the guilty plea to the child images has had the same effect on me...
And before fingers get pointed.. I do not condone anyone abusing children.... I am just trying to understand how the case against Dr Vincent Tabak came about...
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jo-yeates-murderer-vincent-tabak-276472https://twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/401998427921199104https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2056041/Vincent-Tabak-child-porn-Police-30-sick-images-murderers-laptop.htmlhttps://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/mar/02/vincent-tabak-admits-possessing-indecent-images-of-childrenhttps://twitter.com/mwilliamsthomas/status/131354079879380992