Then your criteria appears to have been met in spades by Heri, Pat, Peter and the PJ team of 29 October 2007.
On what basis are you including "the PJ team of 29 October 2007" ?
The problem that exists for supporters and sceptics alike as I see it is that they are totally dependent on photos videoclips and information posted on that tinternet.
Photos and video clips are essentially the same media, being manipulable so therefore of questionable reliability.
The first ever war photographer was Roger Fenton. Debate still "rages" around whether his photo of "The Valley of Death" was rigged. That's since 1854!. So let's acknowledge the photographic medium can be a bit unreliable.
Internet? part of computing. All you need know about a computer "It is a big dumb fast adding machine that knows nothing until you tell it something. If you tell it the sun rises in the west it will believe you but worse than that is thereafter if you say the sun rises in the east it will tell you you are wrong". That tinternet is pretty much the same. The absence of something in an internet search means just that and no more.
So against that backdrop from the comfort of the sitting room the answer will likely be a lemon.
Best get down the Algarve and read the files in the court then have a good look around making sure you have taken an appropriate expert with you to interpret what you are looking at. As most on here still can't work out how a roller shutter works and it only has about five basic components, understanding anything with seven or eight or more basic components would cause major headaches IMO.