Recent Posts

Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]
91
There is surely only one question to ask, which I am reluctant to mention.  But under certain physical situations it isn't possible for a man to urinate.  So was it or wasn't it? I bet Fulscher didn't ask that.  So ultimately nothing gained from traumatising a young girl.

I think he probably did, as the witness said that CB didn't seem to be aroused.
92
I got the impression that his tough questioning of the young woman who witnessed Brueckner
exposing himself to the children in the playground when she was a child didn't go down well.  Particularly when he was admonished from someone at the Portuguese link.
Perhaps he will have learned from that and will conduct future questioning of other survivors more appropriately.

Snip
A Portuguese police officer sitting next to her reminded the Braunschweig regional court that the young woman could be ‘traumatised’ by in-depth cross examination.
But this didn’t stop Brueckner’s defence lawyer Friedrich Fulscher from asking numerous questions about the difference between urinating and masturbating. Was it possible she knew the difference? https://archive.ph/zXw3H#selection-1489.0-1489.196

There is surely only one question to ask, which I am reluctant to mention.  But under certain physical situations it isn't possible for a man to urinate.  So was it or wasn't it?  I bet Fulscher didn't ask that.  So ultimately nothing gained from traumatising a young girl.
93
I am beginning to understand what The German Prosecution are doing.  They are marrying the old with the new, the convictions with the new evidence and the credibility of certain witnesses regarding the two apparently unknown victims wherein the MO is ever present.  Hazel Behan's evidence will be crucial so what does Fulscher intend to try to do when she is on The Stand?  Trashing her won't go down well with The Judges.
I got the impression that his tough questioning of the young woman who witnessed Brueckner
exposing himself to the children in the playground when she was a child didn't go down well.  Particularly when he was admonished from someone at the Portuguese link.
Perhaps he will have learned from that and will conduct future questioning of other survivors more appropriately.

Snip
A Portuguese police officer sitting next to her reminded the Braunschweig regional court that the young woman could be ‘traumatised’ by in-depth cross examination.
But this didn’t stop Brueckner’s defence lawyer Friedrich Fulscher from asking numerous questions about the difference between urinating and masturbating. Was it possible she knew the difference? https://archive.ph/zXw3H#selection-1489.0-1489.196
94

I am beginning to understand what The German Prosecution are doing.  They are marrying the old with the new, the convictions with the new evidence and the credibility of certain witnesses regarding the two apparently unknown victims wherein the MO is ever present.  Hazel Behan's evidence will be crucial so what does Fulscher intend to try to do when she is on The Stand?  Trashing her won't go down well with The Judges.
97
Him and me both! Although if walls could speak!
Or Crispy's ghost could yap and point his paw at a pic of the culprit!
99
You had written, "I have no interest being pals with rapists & child killers."  In other words, you were the one to bring the subject up.

Boomer.

Have you got any convictions, Chrisy?
100
Wrong thread. Go start a new one in the appropriate place, for those that give a F
You had written, "I have no interest being pals with rapists & child killers."  In other words, you were the one to bring the subject up. 
Pages: 1 ... 8 9 [10]