Eye scanners being used to search for missing children.

[G-Unit]

did bushra have an eye defect

No idea, not the point. You wouldn't know if the vital sighting wasn't reported because the child didn't have an eye defect would you, because it wouldn't have been reported. Duh!

[mercury]

trying to make something out of nothing again....how many of the reported sightings mentioned a coloboma...none..
so no sightings were dismissed

Making thngs up again?

[sadie]

Making thngs up again?

Care to clarify that mercury?

[mercury]

Care to clarify that mercury?

Just saying there have been sightings where the sighters have mentioned the eye defect, some are in the files, others in paper reports, so none is not true

[sadie]

Just to say AGAIN, the little girl being carried WAS NOT Bushra.

And looked remarkably like Madeleine.

The eye defect is NOT relevant to this sighting cos the little girl was too far away for such a minute thing to be cauht on the image.

[mercury]

Just to say AGAIN, the little girl being carried WAS NOT Bushra.

And looked remarkably like Madeleine.

The eye defect is NOT relevant to this sighting cos the little girl was too far away for such a minute thing to be cauht on the image.

Who mentioned her?

Please read again. It was claimed NO sightings ever mentioned the eye defect, that statement is wrong, end of,

BTW you have excluded the possibility of photoshopping!! We all know how "dodgy" certain players in this sorry saga were!

[pegasus]

trying to make something out of nothing again....how many of the reported sightings mentioned a coloboma...none..
so no sightings were dismissed

"Whenever someone calls the Queenstown, New Zealand, police to report that they’ve seen a little girl who looks just like Madeleine McCann, the 4-year-old Briton who disappeared from her parents’ holiday villa in Portugal the night of May 3, 2007, police know exactly whom they are talking about. They’ve been called to investigate a Maddie sighting five times in the last five years in the cities of Queenstown, Milton, and Alexandra, and each time they are led to the same young child, who not only shares McCann’s hair coloring and petite stature, but also has the same coloboma in her right eye."

[G-Unit]

The point I was trying to make is this;

I see a child who looks like Madeleine. In order to be sure I get close enough to 'look into her eye'. There's no coloboma so I decide it's not her and I don't report it.

That could have happened.

[Mr Gray]

The point I was trying to make is this;

I see a child who looks like Madeleine. In order to be sure I get close enough to 'look into her eye'. There's no coloboma so I decide it's not her and I don't report it.

That could have happened.

First...if it was Maddie I doubt you would be allowed that close
second...if you were you would see a fleck in her right eye

[stephen25000]

Just to say AGAIN, the little girl being carried WAS NOT Bushra.

And looked remarkably like Madeleine.

The eye defect is NOT relevant to this sighting cos the little girl was too far away for such a minute thing to be cauht on the image.

#

YOU CAN PROVE THAT OF COURSE ?

[Lace]

Just saying there have been sightings where the sighters have mentioned the eye defect, some are in the files, others in paper reports, so none is not true

Well,  the fact that some reported the fleck in Madeleine's eye proves that people would report the sighting if they saw it doesn't it.

Of course the fleck wasn't the same as the posters,   they exaggerated the fleck so that it would be seen at a distance when people looked at the poster,  if they had just put a tiny fleck in her eye,  no one would have seen it.

If someone DID see it in a child's eye though it would make their sighting even more believable.

[Lace]

The point I was trying to make is this;

I see a child who looks like Madeleine. In order to be sure I get close enough to 'look into her eye'. There's no coloboma so I decide it's not her and I don't report it.

That could have happened.

If you were close enough to see the fleck in Madeleine's eye and the different colour iris to her other eye wouldn't that and the fact the child resembled Madeleine be enough?

[faithlilly]

If you were close enough to see the fleck in Madeleine's eye and the different colour iris to her other eye wouldn't that and the fact the child resembled Madeleine be enough?

How would you know after eight and a half years if she resembled Madeleine ?

[G-Unit]

Well,  the fact that some reported the fleck in Madeleine's eye proves that people would report the sighting if they saw it doesn't it.

Of course the fleck wasn't the same as the posters,   they exaggerated the fleck so that it would be seen at a distance when people looked at the poster,  if they had just put a tiny fleck in her eye,  no one would have seen it.

If someone DID see it in a child's eye though it would make their sighting even more believable.

Are you saying they changed the appearance of her eye in photographs to exaggerate the 'fleck'? I have seen pictures where there appears to be nothing unusual about her eye whatsoever.

[sadie]

Are you saying they changed the appearance of her eye in photographs to exaggerate the 'fleck'? I have seen pictures where there appears to be nothing unusual about her eye whatsoever.

Appearances can be deceptive

See:

http://www.clspectrum.com/articleviewer.aspx?articleID=104098