Media reports provided on this forum are for information only.
Endorsement of such material is neither intended nor implied.
* Posters are asked to keep to thread topics where possible
* Libellous or defamatory material will be removed on sight
* Abuse will not be tolerated. Break the rules expect a ban!
Contact > admin@miscarriageofjustice.co
Praia da Luz - Live webcams
Recent Posts
By the way, the Met have said the McCanns are not involved so you?re talking horseshit again.
The sighting of Gerry is not evidence of abduction.There?s little point me explaining why abduction is the only logical and plausible explanation for Madeleine?s disappearance again because I?ve done it dozens of times already on this forum and I?m not repeating myself. We all know that there is no physical evidence of abduction but once you have investigated and eliminated all the other possible theories it remains the most likely. It?s a view shared by the professionals involved in investigating this case so I can?t be that much of a crackpot. There is still an arguido in this case by the way with plenty of circumstantial evidence of his involvement and it looks like the evidence against him in other cases is to be reexamined by the German court. Hopefully this will result in a retrial and the despicable creep back in jail where he belongs.
Not once have the MET said the McCanns are innocent. Nor have they presented any evidence Madeleine was abducted. Apart from the sighting of Gerry.By the way, the Met have said the McCanns are not involved so you?re talking horseshit again.
She made the claim in her 'account of the truth'.Yes, her best selling book read by millions. Don?t you think any of the Tapas 7 bothered to read it, nor any of the OC staff, nor Jez Wilkins? Perhaps they?re all in on the cover up.
List the abduction evidence VS. Shouldn't take long. Because there's nothing really. Other than the sighting of Gerry.The sighting of Gerry is not evidence of abduction. There?s little point me explaining why abduction is the only logical and plausible explanation for Madeleine?s disappearance again because I?ve done it dozens of times already on this forum and I?m not repeating myself. We all know that there is no physical evidence of abduction but once you have investigated and eliminated all the other possible theories it remains the most likely. It?s a view shared by the professionals involved in investigating this case so I can?t be that much of a crackpot. There is still an arguido in this case by the way with plenty of circumstantial evidence of his involvement and it looks like the evidence against him in other cases is to be reexamined by the German court. Hopefully this will result in a retrial and the despicable creep back in jail where he belongs.
Where are all the witnesses coming forward to tell the police she was lying then?
Anyway, Spam is boring me now. Where are the other members of the forum who are convinced he?s right? Joe, wanna have a go at defending the troll?s assessment of the evidence? You?ve been awful quiet lately and it?s time for a more rational discussion with someone a little less highly strung and unpleasant.
Yes, Kate claims Gerry wore blue jeans. But it was her husband that was seen abducting Maddie. So I wouldn't put much faith in her account to be fair.Where are all the witnesses coming forward to tell the police she was lying then?
It?s not only the McCanns claiming that now, thr Met have been saying it for years and the Germans now also. I think even the morons at the PJ have come round to that way of thinking. I wonder why?? What do you put it down to?
