Author Topic: Cause and effect. Dated articles that predate Amaral's book.  (Read 26085 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Luz

Re: Cause and effect. Dated articles that predate Amaral's book.
« Reply #105 on: September 24, 2013, 09:14:11 PM »
How thickly can some minds function to the point of deceiving themselves?!
The reason Amaral was excused from Madeleine's case was political/diplomatic, nothing to do with breaches of the secrecy of justice. If there were leaks, and I believe there were, most certainly it weren't from him but from some undergraduate detective.,
Furthermore. an investigation "task-force" is not an army company where the soldiers are like machines obeying the commander's voice. An investigation group is a heterogeneous group with different skills and a certain degree of autonomy. The coordinator is what the title means; he/she manages the distribution of tasks according to the different skills of the team members and puts the results together. In the files, it's visible that almost all the documents were written by the team members and not Amaral. Yet, some people seem to believe that the coordinator was working alone.

One of  the most damning reports for the McCann was the interim report, however I've never heard anyone protesting against it or the person that wrote it.

That's why I think that this obsession with Amaral is, if not deviously strategic, very pathological.

Offline LagosBen

Re: Cause and effect. Dated articles that predate Amaral's book.
« Reply #106 on: September 25, 2013, 10:37:07 AM »
So when will you respond to the fact that you were totally wrong about your claims concerning Amaral? Paiva proved you to be wrong. Don't you think you owe the forum an explanation?

Obviously not one for saying sorry when she is proven wrong. >@@(*&)

C.Edwards

  • Guest
Re: Cause and effect. Dated articles that predate Amaral's book.
« Reply #107 on: September 25, 2013, 12:24:59 PM »
Obviously not one for saying sorry when she is proven wrong. >@@(*&)

Hmm. I'm guessing that cherry-picking quotes and taking them out of context doesn't necessarily count as proof for some?

Offline LagosBen

Re: Cause and effect. Dated articles that predate Amaral's book.
« Reply #108 on: September 25, 2013, 04:36:00 PM »
Hmm. I'm guessing that cherry-picking quotes and taking them out of context doesn't necessarily count as proof for some?

You have no clue but you jump in anyway.

 8-)(--)

Fact is I stated Paiva said something at a previous part of the Trial.(Read my sig).

Luz said it was a lie.

I knew it wasn't and provided the tweet concerned. As did Gilet.

Luz was proved wrong and didn't like it hence no apology.
So no cherry picking at all.

Offline LagosBen

Re: Cause and effect. Dated articles that predate Amaral's book.
« Reply #109 on: September 26, 2013, 08:55:28 PM »
Still no apology from Luz.... >@@(*&)