Why does the Maddie case continue to attract so much passion?

[Vertigo Swirl]

To use the vernacular, it was kettle calling the pot grimey ar*e.

Are you accusimg me of not answering questions, of not sharing my opinions and theories, etc? 

[Vertigo Swirl]

One of the things I believe you have objected to is the addition of imo to posts which are opinion. I can understand your frustration if, as you say, all your posts are opinion.

A discussion based purely on opinion might be;

I think the SC judges were wrong.
I think they were right.


Unless the facts on which those opinions are based are discussed there's no more to be said.

Of course you have to add WHY you think they are wrong or right, that’s how discussion works.  All of my posts are my opinion, as are yours.  Your every post, even the purely factual ones are posted to support your opinion, the one you refuse to spell out but which we can all figure out anyway.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Of course you have to add WHY you think they are wrong or right, that’s how discussion works.  All of my posts are my opinion, as are yours.  Your every post, even the purely factual ones are posted to support your opinion, the one you refuse to spell out but which we can all figure out anyway.

If you have got it all figured out why bother asking? what makes you think  some members want to discuss anything with supporters- or offer opinions to them. The supporters do not have closure ,they don't like people talking about things which are on file, in a book by the mother, and in interviews.... it hurts them. oh dear.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If you have got it all figured out why bother asking? what makes you think  some members want to discuss anything with supporters- or offer opinions to them. The supporters do not have closure ,they don't like people talking about things which are on file, in a book by the mother, and in interviews.... it hurts them. oh dear.

The only reason you post here is because supporters post here IMO.  If we all left, it would be a lot less fun for you, wouldn’t it?

[jassi]

The only reason you post here is because supporters post here IMO.  If we all left, it would be a lot less fun for you, wouldn’t it?

We'd be able to have adult conversations about various aspects of the case without being interrupted by the children

[Mr Gray]

We'd be able to have adult conversations about various aspects of the case without being interrupted by the children

do your parents know you are on the computer

[Robittybob1]

do your parents know you are on the computer

Are you having some sort of seance in your living room Davel?

[Vertigo Swirl]

We'd be able to have adult conversations about various aspects of the case without being interrupted by the children

You’re another one who is only here for the sport of being spiteful to McCann supporters IMO.  Without us here I think you would find it a trifle dull, but by all means prove me wrong by putting all supporters on ignore, and limit your posts to “grown up” conversations with those you approve of.  I bet you don’t...

[G-Unit]

Of course you have to add WHY you think they are wrong or right, that’s how discussion works.  All of my posts are my opinion, as are yours.  Your every post, even the purely factual ones are posted to support your opinion, the one you refuse to spell out but which we can all figure out anyway.

Once you get into 'why' you are bringing facts into the discussion. That's when cites and links are needed so that both parties can check, interpret and discuss those facts.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Once you get into 'why' you are bringing facts into the discussion. That's when cites and links are needed so that both parties can check, interpret and discuss those facts.

Discussing facts without offering any opinion or interpretation of them is pointless and dull IMO. 

[G-Unit]

Discussing facts without offering any opinion or interpretation of them is pointless and dull IMO.

Before you can discuss your opinions and interpretations of a fact you need to agree that a) it is indeed a fact b) it;s being interpreted correctly and c) there are no facts which contradict it. Otherwise your opinion is based on false premises.

[Mr Gray]

Before you can discuss your opinions and interpretations of a fact you need to agree that a) it is indeed a fact b) it;s being interpreted correctly and c) there are no facts which contradict it. Otherwise your opinion is based on false premises.

lol...IMO you are the one who posted that grime stated that the the alert by eddie was suggestive of cadaver...which was untrue...and imo....on making that post...which was false...you lost all credibility

[slartibartfast]

lol...IMO you are the one who posted that grime stated that the the alert by eddie was suggestive of cadaver...which was untrue...and imo....on making that post...which was false...you lost all credibility

Please provide a cite.

[Mr Gray]

Please provide a cite.

 I cant provide a cite at the moment...lets ask g if she denies making this post

[Sunny]

I cant provide a cite at the moment...lets ask g if she denies making this post

You asked for a cite Davel it is up to you surely to show that G-Unit made a post not them to deny it.