Is sectarianism a factor in the McCann case?

[G-Unit]

Those words are not limited to sectarianism and they have not been words described as being used by those who doubt the McCann's... They are, words used to abuse the mccanns.. Several if those words have been used here and Brenda used the wird hate

Those words may not be limited to sectarianism but they're frequently used in connection with it. I can't remember ever accusing someone of 'spewing bile' at another person; it's not part of my vocabulary.

[Robittybob1]

Except that some think Madeleine woke and wandered. No parental involvement required.

So if you think it is possible "Madeleine woke and wandered" are you neither a supporter or a sceptic? 

[slartibartfast]

So if you think it is possible "Madeleine woke and wandered" are you neither a supporter or a sceptic?

You are a sceptic in this case if you have doubts about the “accepted” narrative.

[Vertigo Swirl]

You are a sceptic in this case if you have doubts about the “accepted” narrative.

And you share the same bed as those who have doubts about other “accepted” narratives, such as the killing of Lee Rigby, Sandy Hook, 9/11 etc. 

[Mr Gray]

So if you think it is possible "Madeleine woke and wandered" are you neither a supporter or a sceptic?

I didn't class woke and wandered as sceptics because they are not accusing the McCann's of deceit on a criminal scale

[Vertigo Swirl]

Those words may not be limited to sectarianism but they're frequently used in connection with it. I can't remember ever accusing someone of 'spewing bile' at another person; it's not part of my vocabulary.

You have several times accused me (laughably IMO) of abusing you, simply for asking your opinion, or suggesting that you hold beliefs which you refuse to acknowledge publicly. 

[Mr Gray]

You are a sceptic in this case if you have doubts about the “accepted” narrative.

Depends what you mean by accepted narrative... Doubting is by definition  scepticism

[slartibartfast]

And you share the same bed as those who have doubts about other “accepted” narratives, such as the killing of Lee Rigby, Sandy Hook, 9/11 etc.

I wonder how many fallacies we can get from that...

Straw Man
Genetic
Ad Hom

To have doubts about one story in no way implies you have doubts about established facts.

[G-Unit]

So if you think it is possible "Madeleine woke and wandered" are you neither a supporter or a sceptic?

You have demonstrated the problem with labelling people. Those people are sceptical of the 'abduction from the apartment' theory.

[G-Unit]

And you share the same bed as those who have doubts about other “accepted” narratives, such as the killing of Lee Rigby, Sandy Hook, 9/11 etc.

Which bit of 'in this case' did you fail to understand?

[G-Unit]

You have several times accused me (laughably IMO) of abusing you, simply for asking your opinion, or suggesting that you hold beliefs which you refuse to acknowledge publicly.

Do you have examples please?

[Robittybob1]

You have demonstrated the problem with labelling people. Those people are sceptical of the 'abduction from the apartment' theory.

But we are supportive as we are not saying the McCanns were involved in the occultation of Madeleine's body.

[slartibartfast]

But we are supportive as we are not saying the McCanns were involved in the occultation of Madeleine's body.

We?

[Mr Gray]

You have demonstrated the problem with labelling people. Those people are sceptical of the 'abduction from the apartment' theory.

I think you have a problem with being labelled... There is nothing wrong with labelling groups if people as long ad you don't make incorrect assumptions of those who are part if that group

[Robittybob1]

We?

Me, John, Angelo any others?