Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.

[Vertigo Swirl]

If something new came to light?

Like what?

[Brietta]

The remit in your signature, was it for the review or the investigation?

Please frame your questions less to deflect but more to reflect thread topics.

[Mr Gray]

If something new came to light?

So has new evidence come to light and are the PJ investigating it... What's the evidence for either

[barrier]

So has new evidence come to light and are the PJ investigating it... What's the evidence for either

Like what?

Would you both expect a running commentary?

[Mr Gray]

Would you both expect a running commentary?

So pure speculation.... But they have both made statements supporting the mccanns innocence... Just part of the evidence that supports the mccanns innocence

[barrier]

So pure speculation.... But they have both made statements supporting the mccanns innocence... Just part of the evidence that supports the mccanns innocence

With Pedro Do Carmo explaining that they have to be prepared for different scenarios,thats a leap in the dark.
Not forgetting the SC court words.

[Robittybob1]

Maybe she ran out from the path which skirts block 5 and ran across the road right in front of a car?

I find your last two comments contradict each other
"Explain why it terminated at the lamppost opposite mini reception then and didn't go all the way to the juniors club?"  Either she made it to the lamp post or knocked down at the path.  Which?  Or how do you link the two?

[Robittybob1]

Explain why knowing about this evidence the archiving despatch rated woke and wandered highly unlikely

it was up to the authors of the archiving report to explain why they " rated woke and wandered highly unlikely".

[Mr Gray]

With Pedro Do Carmo explaining that they have to be prepared for different scenarios,thats a leap in the dark.
Not forgetting the SC court words.

De  carmo said thetevwsd no evidence against the mccanns and they were not suspects... The SCsaid nothing that contradicts that

[Mr Gray]

it was up to the authors of the archiving report to explain why they " rated woke and wandered highly unlikely".

The fact they made the statement has significance...

[Robittybob1]

The fact they made the statement has significance...

Maybe it does, but without their reasoning it is about as valuable as the authors opinion.

[Sunny]

De  carmo said thetevwsd no evidence against the mccanns and they were not suspects... The SCsaid nothing that contradicts that

I have seen a link to where Do Carmo said they are not suspects but not one where he said there was no evidence against the McCanns. Could you provide a cite please Davel.

[Mr Gray]

Maybe it does, but without their reasoning it is about as valuable as the authors opinion.

The author who has all the evidence

[Mr Gray]

I have seen a link to where Do Carmo said they are not suspects but not one where he said there was no evidence against the McCanns. Could you provide a cite please Davel.

It's on the same link and been cited many times.... It never ceases to amaze me how some posters, are just not aware of some very basic facts...

https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=pedro+de%2Fcarmo+no+evidence+not+suspects&oq=pedro+de%2Fcarmo+no+evidence+not+suspects&aqs=chrome..69i57.21093j0j7&client=ms-android-tmobile-gb&sourceid=chrome-mobile&ie=UTF-8

[Mr Gray]

Is that wishful thinking per chance?

You are making an assumption thst I wish the mccanns to be innocent... You are wrong