Author Topic: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.  (Read 243328 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1305 on: June 09, 2019, 10:30:23 AM »
Exactly.

Why? place yourself in Jimmy's shoes,enter the bedroom, choice,over to the window and open it and shutters,snatch the girl and away,or enter the bedroom snatch the girl over to the window,put girl down open window and shutters and away,or snatch girl, off out the door,simples really.

So why would a woke and wandered be any more of a scenario than the above.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1306 on: June 09, 2019, 10:33:37 AM »

You meant the more difficult and time consuming of the two?
What?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1307 on: June 09, 2019, 10:35:56 AM »
Why? place yourself in Jimmy's shoes,enter the bedroom, choice,over to the window and open it and shutters,snatch the girl and away,or enter the bedroom snatch the girl over to the window,put girl down open window and shutters and away,or snatch girl, off out the door,simples really.

So why would a woke and wandered be any more of a scenario than the above.
How about enter the bedroom, open window and shutter first before picking up the girl?  Opening the shutter also allows a little bit of light into the room so you can see exactly where she is and how to pick her up.  Then do so and leave, perhaps with an accomplice on the other side of the window?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1308 on: June 09, 2019, 11:41:40 AM »
Why? place yourself in Jimmy's shoes,enter the bedroom, choice,over to the window and open it and shutters,snatch the girl and away,or enter the bedroom snatch the girl over to the window,put girl down open window and shutters and away,or snatch girl, off out the door,simples really.

So why would a woke and wandered be any more of a scenario than the above.
There are more logical sequences than what you describe IMO.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1309 on: June 09, 2019, 11:43:21 AM »
There are more logical sequences than what you describe IMO.

Its a woke and wandered thread so go on.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1310 on: June 09, 2019, 11:44:18 AM »
How about enter the bedroom, open window and shutter first before picking up the girl?  Opening the shutter also allows a little bit of light into the room so you can see exactly where she is and how to pick her up.  Then do so and leave, perhaps with an accomplice on the other side of the window?
Exactly- Jimmy might open the shutters and find that Madeleine wasn't even in the room.  She had woke and wandered!
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1311 on: June 09, 2019, 12:36:02 PM »
How about enter the bedroom, open window and shutter first before picking up the girl?  Opening the shutter also allows a little bit of light into the room so you can see exactly where she is and how to pick her up.  Then do so and leave, perhaps with an accomplice on the other side of the window?

Raising the shutters was noisy. It would attract the attention of anyone nearby who was out of sight of Jimmy and his mate, not to mention the risk of wakening three children.

It was the previous occupant of G5A, Paul Gordon, who mentioned the noisy shutters. #
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAUL_GORDON.htm
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1312 on: June 09, 2019, 12:37:55 PM »
Raising the shutters was noisy. It would attract the attention of anyone nearby who was out of sight of Jimmy and his mate, not to mention the risk of wakening three children.

It was the previous occupant of G5A, Paul Gordon, who mentioned the noisy shutters. #
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAUL_GORDON.htm
So could we surmise  that whoever opened the shutters woke Madeleine up.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1313 on: June 09, 2019, 01:00:09 PM »
So could we surmise  that whoever opened the shutters woke Madeleine up.


You could,there again she might have already gone by then.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1314 on: June 09, 2019, 01:01:22 PM »

You could,there again she might have already gone by then.
Who knows the truth?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline barrier

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1315 on: June 09, 2019, 01:10:38 PM »
Who knows the truth?

12 yrs on,its not been determined yet imo.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1316 on: June 09, 2019, 02:53:26 PM »
Raising the shutters was noisy. It would attract the attention of anyone nearby who was out of sight of Jimmy and his mate, not to mention the risk of wakening three children.

It was the previous occupant of G5A, Paul Gordon, who mentioned the noisy shutters. #
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/PAUL_GORDON.htm
How noisy is noisy?  Noisy inside the room or noisy outside the room?  Can the amount of noise be lessened by opening them more slowly and carefully?  Is the noise of opening shutters in Pdl likely to attract attention or is it a fairly commonplace sound like the passing of a car?  Did anyone notice the noise of Kate allegedly opening the shutters?  So what if the three kids awakened?  The abductor wouldn’t have been planning to stick around for long.  In any case they ddn’t wake up when their parents “tampered” with the shutters so does that mean they only said the window and shutters had been opened but they never  bothered to actually open them?
« Last Edit: June 09, 2019, 04:05:46 PM by Vertigo Swirl »
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline G-Unit

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1317 on: June 09, 2019, 02:56:54 PM »
So could we surmise  that whoever opened the shutters woke Madeleine up.

No, because they were later closed, then raised again twice and the twins slept on. Abductors wouldn't have expected shildren to do that though., so imo it was a risk they wouldn't have taken.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1318 on: June 09, 2019, 04:06:27 PM »
No, because they were later closed, then raised again twice and the twins slept on. Abductors wouldn't have expected shildren to do that though., so imo it was a risk they wouldn't have taken.
You really cannot decide what a child abductor would and wouldn't do, IMO. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Angelo222

Re: Seems woke and wandered back in favour again.
« Reply #1319 on: June 09, 2019, 04:17:26 PM »
You really cannot decide what a child abductor would and wouldn't do, IMO.

IMO, a child abductor would never contemplate abducting a child from a bedroom containing two other children given that they would probably scream the place down thus attracting attention.  Better the lone child, much easier to control the situation.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!