Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.

[Wonderfulspam]

Did we?  Gove me a link or a brief precis including timeline, location of bin etc.

Read the sceptic thread, it's in there somewhere.

[Mr Gray]

She's either out there = (1) abducted & recoverable

Or she's not= (2) not abducted or recoverable

& there's nothing to say she's not out there alive= (3) abducted, alive & recoverable

So it's simple, she's out there until proven otherwise.

....

Option (2) shouldn't be an option if Maddie was abducted, but option (2) exists, because she wasn't.

oh dear ..are you not familiar with Quantum Theory....she could be out there ..and not out there...at the same time....

[Vertigo Swirl]

She's either out there = (1) abducted & recoverable

Or she's not= (2) not abducted or recoverable

& there's nothing to say she's not out there alive= (3) abducted, alive & recoverable

So it's simple, she's out there until proven otherwise.

....

Option (2) shouldn't be an option if Maddie was abducted, but option (2) exists, because she wasn't.

And yet the police believe otherwise, strange isn’t it?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Read the sceptic thread, it's in there somewhere.

Nah, tell us again, cba’d to trawl through it all.

[pathfinder73]

Did we?  Gove me a link or a brief precis including timeline, location of bin etc.

In that theory the bin would have to be close to the beach. Smithman had passed bins before the sighting so I ruled it out.

[Wonderfulspam]

And yet the police believe otherwise, strange isn’t it?

Yes, they believe that anyone of a great list of suspects have abducted Maddie, based on the evidence.
I find it fascinating just how many different people are implicated by the abduction evidence which remains top secret. Paedos, junkies, bin men & burglars. butchers, bakers. candlestick makers. Take your pick. Spin the wheel of suspects & see where it lands.

[G-Unit]

In that theory the bin would have to be close to the beach. Smithman had passed bins before the sighting so I ruled it out.

On the other hand if simeone is spotted they might react by getting rid of the evidence asap.

[jassi]

Yes, they believe that anyone of a great list of suspects have abducted Maddie, based on the evidence.
I find it fascinating just how many different people are implicated by the abduction evidence which remains top secret. Paedos, junkies, bin men & burglars. butchers, bakers. candlestick makers. Take your pick. Spin the wheel of suspects & see where it lands.

And remember officers, if you happen to  land on the McCann segment, you automatically get to spin again. 

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, they believe that anyone of a great list of suspects have abducted Maddie, based on the evidence.
I find it fascinating just how many different people are implicated by the abduction evidence which remains top secret. Paedos, junkies, bin men & burglars. butchers, bakers. candlestick makers. Take your pick. Spin the wheel of suspects & see where it lands.

Perhaps you can explain why you (without full infettered access to all the evidence) knows better than the police (who do have full and unfettered access to all the evidence)?

[Wonderfulspam]

Perhaps you can explain why you (without full infettered access to all the evidence) knows better than the police (who do have full and unfettered access to all the evidence)?

Perhaps you can explain how so many different people can be implicated by the abduction evidence?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Perhaps you can explain how so many different people can be implicated by the abduction evidence?

Perhaps you can answer my question first before deflecting with your own?

[Mr Gray]

The FBI worked with Grime cuz his dogs were the best and very reliable! Eddie and Keela first went to the FBI body farm and were tested. Both dogs passed with flying colours. This was prior to the McCann case. Incredibly NOT unreliable!

[Wonderfulspam]

Perhaps you can answer my question first before deflecting with your own?

Perhaps you could answer mine first, I've answered plenty of yours already. How about you try explaining something for once.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Perhaps you could answer mine first, I've answered plenty of yours already. How about you try explaining something for once.

I guess I asked you a question you simply cannot answer.  As for your rather facetious question, some crimes are investigated in which there are a number of suspects that are investigated and either eliminated or not, there is nothing massively unusual about it, why do you think there is?

[Wonderfulspam]

I guess I asked you a question you simply cannot answer.  As for your rather facetious question, some crimes are investigated in which there are a number of suspects that are investigated and either eliminated or not, there is nothing massively unusual about it, why do you think there is?

Because, as I said, I find it strange that the abduction evidence can implicate so many different people.
Robert Murat was made an arguido by the PJ on behalf of Grange.
What can he possibly have in common with this 'new' paedo murderer suspect?
Residing in Portugal in 2007?
To me, that doesn't say much about the strength of the abduction evidence.