At Last a Podcast from the Experts.

[Robittybob1]

Laura Richards said they didn't begin at the beginning, despite Redwood claiming that he had.

Where is the beginning?

[G-Unit]

what does  she know

More than you when it comes to NSY in my opinion.

[Mr Gray]

Just because these three claim to be expertsdoes not mean they are right... We all know experts disagree... I don't see any real serious criticism of Grange... They have chosen not to interview  the mccanns under caution... I don't see any problem with that.
In my view if you look at all the evidence it's clear the mccanns are not involved... And that's what I feel Grange have done....

[Mr Gray]

More than you when it comes to NSY in my opinion.

I would say I and several posters here know more about the case than she dies and like Sutton she knows no more about what Grange are doing than we do

[faithlilly]

I haven't watched this Podcast.  I really can't face another one, so I don't know what they said.

No, I do not think that Amaral got it right.

No need to watch Eleanor, you listen to a podcast. I listen while doing my sugar art.

[faithlilly]

I would say I and several posters here know more about the case than she dies and like Sutton she knows no more about what Grange are doing than we do

Some posters on here are very informed on the case....you, unfortunately, aren’t one of them.

[Eleanor]

No need to watch Eleanor, you listen to a podcast. I listen while doing my sugar art.

Really?  No Pictures?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Some posters on here are very informed on the case....you, unfortunately, aren’t one of them.

That’s not true.

[Robittybob1]

That’s not true.

All I see is Davel always trying to divert the discussion back to one of his strong points.  Real knowledge would be to discuss the OP topic.  Has Davel listened to the podcasts yet?

[G-Unit]

I would say I and several posters here know more about the case than she dies and like Sutton she knows no more about what Grange are doing than we do

What they know which you don't is how SY normally operate. They both agree that this case was approached differently.

[Mr Gray]

Some posters on here are very informed on the case....you, unfortunately, aren’t one of them.

Seeing as you thought gerrys statement could be used in evidence against him when it couldn't it looks like it's you who hasn't got a grasp of the facts

[Vertigo Swirl]

All I see is Davel always trying to divert the discussion back to one of his strong points.  Real knowledge would be to discuss the OP topic.  Has Davel listened to the podcasts yet?

To state the Davel is not very well informed about the case is just ad hom nonsense.  I know you and Faithlilly both have a problem with him but he knows plenty about the case.

[Mr Gray]

What they know which you don't is how SY normally operate. They both agree that this case was approached dufferently.

Neither of them know how the case was approached... They seem to know no more than we do

[Robittybob1]

Seeing as you thought gerrys statement could be used in evidence against him when it couldn't it looks like it's you who hasn't got a grasp of the facts

I think you are wrong.  Gerry could give evidence in the case or alternatively his statement could be read to the court.  Isn't that what Carana posted?

[Mr Gray]

All I see is Davel always trying to divert the discussion back to one of his strong points.  Real knowledge would be to discuss the OP topic.  Has Davel listened to the podcasts yet?

Thanks for the admision that I have strong points... I can't argue with that... I've listened to snippets...
I think it's clear there will be nothing new... Just more opinion
I've seen nothing of real interest from posters, who have listened to it