Why Should We Believe the Parent’s When....?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I know she knew how to the use the ‘ no comment’ tactic as she used it in her rogatory interview. Why not here ?

What is revealing about this discussion is how blinkered those who support the parents are. Again and again you are given evidence of the parent’s duplicity but still your fingers remain firmly in your ears.

Watching Trump supporters being interviewed at his most recent rally again reminds me of the old adage...it’s easier to fool a person than to convince them that they've been fooled.

Prove Gerry was deliberately lying to mislead viewers.  You can't.  The end. 

[Mr Gray]

I know she knew how to the use the ‘ no comment’ tactic as she used it in her rogatory interview. Why not here ?

What is revealing about this discussion is how blinkered those who support the parents are. Again and again you are given evidence of the parent’s duplicity but still your fingers remain firmly in your ears.

Watching Trump supporters being interviewed at his most recent rally again reminds me of the old adage...it’s easier to fool a person than to convince them that they've been fooled.

I think it's you who is blinkered and it's you who has been fooled

[Vertigo Swirl]

I know she knew how to the use the ‘ no comment’ tactic as she used it in her rogatory interview. Why not here ?

What is revealing about this discussion is how blinkered those who support the parents are. Again and again you are given evidence of the parent’s duplicity but still your fingers remain firmly in your ears.

Watching Trump supporters being interviewed at his most recent rally again reminds me of the old adage...it’s easier to fool a person than to convince them that they've been fooled.

COuld we have a cite for Kate using "no comment" in her rogatory interview?  Where in this TV interview do you believe Kate should have said "no comment"?  What did she say instead that was duplicitous?  Let's see this amazing evidence that we're ignoring.

[Erngath]

I know she knew how to the use the ‘ no comment’ tactic as she used it in her rogatory interview. Why not here ?

What is revealing about this discussion is how blinkered those who support the parents are. Again and again you are given evidence of the parent’s duplicity but still your fingers remain firmly in your ears.

Watching Trump supporters being interviewed at his most recent rally again reminds me of the old adage...it’s easier to fool a person than to convince them that they've been fooled.

I know you have a very poor opnion of those who do not believe that Madeleine's parents are duplictious but it could be that we are not the blinkered ones, nor have our fingers in our ears.
Not pleasant accusations but mild compared to your grossly insulting comparison to being Trump supporters.

 

[Eleanor]

COuld we have a cite for Kate using "no comment" in her rogatory interview?  Where in this TV interview do you believe Kate should have said "no comment"?  What did she say instead that was duplicitous?  Let's see this amazing evidence that we're ignoring.

Kate McCann didn't do a Rogatory Interview.

[Erngath]

COuld we have a cite for Kate using "no comment" in her rogatory interview?  Where in this TV interview do you believe Kate should have said "no comment"?  What did she say instead that was duplicitous?  Let's see this amazing evidence that we're ignoring.

Perhaps Faith will respond to this post?

[ShiningInLuz]

Not just fake... Genuine ones to
If I'm asked to contribute I ask how much of my pound is actually received by those the charities support... The answer is usually.. I don't know... So I don't contribute

I question everything  and have decided based on the evidence that the mccanns are innocent... Not 100%...but close

Luz is the home of NECI.  They take in children who have learning difficulties, and children who are terminally ill, partly to give the parents a days respite, and partly to give the kids 'a day out'.  To be clear, that means inside a large, safe modern facility in western Luz.

We used to live around 100m away from NECI.

It is clear from the facilities used by NECI that they have significant overheads.

Would I care about that if a NECI collector knocked on my door and asked for 10€?  Not in the slightest.  My issue would be that NECI is on record as stating it does not do door-to-door collections, so probably I'm talking to a fake.

Should anyone ever visit Luz, NECI has a covered stand on the sea-front avenida.  If you are feeling charitable, it is a cause I can heartily recommend.

[Robittybob1]

COuld we have a cite for Kate using "no comment" in her rogatory interview?  Where in this TV interview do you believe Kate should have said "no comment"?  What did she say instead that was duplicitous?  Let's see this amazing evidence that we're ignoring.

Katedid not do a rogatory interview AFAIK.  Not in the list
"
KATE MCCANN 48 QUESTIONS TO WHICH SHE DID NOT RESPOND 07 SEP 2007
KATE MCCANN 04 MAY 2007 STATEMENT
KATE MCCANN 06 SEP 2007 ARGUIDO
KATE MCCANN 07 SEP 2007 ARGUIDO
KATE MCCANN DIARY CONCLUSION
KATE MCCANN'S LETTER TO PAOLO REBELO
KATE MCCANN THE BOAT VISION"

[faithlilly]

I know you have a very poor opnion of those who do not believe that Madeleine's parents are duplictious but it could be that we are not the blinkered ones, nor have our fingers in our ears.
Not pleasant accusations but mild compared to your grossly insulting comparison to being Trump supporters.

 

Only the contrary I feel anger for those who do not believe the parents are duplicitous. I would hate to be treated with such utter contempt by those who I offered my support. That the parents use the public’s natural empathy with the parents of lost children against them infuriates me more than just about anything else in this case.

Divide and conquer has always been their raison d’etre for this entire circus and nowhere is it more acutely displayed than on this board. Individuals who, in real life, would probably get on famously knock lumps out of each other each and every day and bestow on each other the most insulting character traits simply because they believe something different. This case is toxic and there is only one reason for that.

[faithlilly]

Perhaps Faith will respond to this post?

I have VS on ignore so only see his posts if they are ncluded in another post but of course I’ll answer.

Kate’s justification for being dishonest about Gerry’s virus was judicial secrecy. She could simply have said no comment, which was exactly what she did when she didn’t want to answer questions in her arguido interview.

[Eleanor]

I have VS on ignore so only see his posts if it’s included in another post but of course I’ll answer.

Kate’s justification for being dishonest about Gerry’s virus was judicial secrecy. She could simply have said no comment, which was exactly what she did when she didn’t want to answer questions in her rogatory interview.

Kate did not do a Rogatory Interview.

[Mr Gray]

Luz is the home of NECI.  They take in children who have learning difficulties, and children who are terminally ill, partly to give the parents a days respite, and partly to give the kids 'a day out'.  To be clear, that means inside a large, safe modern facility in western Luz.

We used to live around 100m away from NECI.

It is clear from the facilities used by NECI that they have significant overheads.

Would I care about that if a NECI collector knocked on my door and asked for 10€?  Not in the slightest.  My issue would be that NECI is on record as stating it does not do door-to-door collections, so probably I'm talking to a fake.

Should anyone ever visit Luz, NECI has a covered stand on the sea-front avenida.  If you are feeling charitable, it is a cause I can heartily recommend.

You miss the point. How much of that 10  euros actually goes to NECI...if its most or all im happy to contribute.
There is a trend now to emply "Chuggers".....poeple who stop you in the street and persuade you to set up a standing order to the likes of OXfam...as I understand the whole of your first years donation goes to the organisation making the collection...thats what I object to

[faithlilly]

Kate did not do a Rogatory Interview.

Apologies, arguido interview...but I’m sure everyone knew that.

[Erngath]

I have VS on ignore so only see his posts if they are ncluded in another post but of course I’ll answer.

Kate’s justification for being dishonest about Gerry’s virus was judicial secrecy. She could simply have said no comment, which was exactly what she did when she didn’t want to answer questions in her arguido interview.

Seems rather silly to have any poster on ignore. IMO.
I doubt there is much point in VS answering then if you will be ignoring that answer.

If VS does answer then I could "bump" the answer and you could respond?

[Vertigo Swirl]

I have VS on ignore so only see his posts if they are ncluded in another post but of course I’ll answer.

Kate’s justification for being dishonest about Gerry’s virus was judicial secrecy. She could simply have said no comment, which was exactly what she did when she didn’t want to answer questions in her arguido interview.

Faithlilly, so she lied.  You lie too.  you admitted it.  Does that mean everything you say is a lie?  Is your credibility in tatters because you lied?    Was the lie Kate told damaging?  Did it cause upset?  Did it prevent justice from being served?  No.  It was inconsequential and not really all that far from the truth.  Not only that, she even owned up to it in her book (no need whatsoever to do that).  Please show some balance and perspective.  I know it's hard when you've invested so much of your time and energy in painting the McCanns as villains, but this is a sad reflection on you, far more than on them.