Author Topic: The timeline revisited  (Read 161333 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2190 on: November 09, 2021, 01:21:14 PM »
I have to wonder why that is.  I have been told that this would be a Judges Only Trial.  Am I supposed to presume that German Judges are influenced by public opinion?

It gives them an excuse not to accept the verdict.. Imo

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2191 on: November 09, 2021, 01:41:33 PM »
It gives them an excuse not to accept the verdict.. Imo

But why?  There has to be a reason for why Sceptics wouldn't accept it.  Although I have to say that their reasons might be interesting.

Offline jassi

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2192 on: November 09, 2021, 01:46:29 PM »
It gives them an excuse not to accept the verdict.. Imo


Goodness me, a verdict already.
I didn't realise charges had been laid, let alone a trial taken place.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2193 on: November 09, 2021, 02:02:38 PM »

Goodness me, a verdict already.
I didn't realise charges had been laid, let alone a trial taken place.

No one has actually said that there will be a trial.  It's all to do with word skills and what you choose to read into a comment incorrectly.

Offline jassi

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2194 on: November 09, 2021, 02:04:23 PM »
No one has actually said that there will be a trial.  It's all to do with word skills and what you choose to read into a comment incorrectly.

No trial, no verdict.
Seems straightforward to me
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2195 on: November 09, 2021, 02:12:32 PM »
No trial, no verdict.
Seems straightforward to me

No one has said that there will be a Trial.  We are all speculating.

Do you understand what Speculating means?

If there was no Speculating then this Forum would die.

Offline jassi

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2196 on: November 09, 2021, 02:18:28 PM »
No one has said that there will be a Trial.  We are all speculating.

Do you understand what Speculating means?

If there was no Speculating then this Forum would die.

While it seems reasonable to speculate over whether a trial will take place, it seems ridiculous to speculate over
 the hypothetical verdict of a hypothetical trial.
And to speculate over the reaction of people to this hypothetical verdict.

IMO
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2197 on: November 09, 2021, 02:29:58 PM »
While it seems reasonable to speculate over whether a trial will take place, it seems ridiculous to speculate over
 the hypothetical verdict of a hypothetical trial.
And to speculate over the reaction of people to this hypothetical verdict.

IMO
What would you prefer to discuss?  How about the McCanns smiling outside the church with balloons?  We haven’t done that one for a while.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2198 on: November 09, 2021, 02:44:40 PM »
What would you prefer to discuss?  How about the McCanns smiling outside the church with balloons?  We haven’t done that one for a while.

Or Kate wearing earrings and getting her hair done while Madeleine was in the bottom of a coffin.  Or stitch up in the body of a dead dog.

Offline jassi

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2199 on: November 09, 2021, 02:47:27 PM »
Or Kate wearing earrings and getting her hair done while Madeleine was in the bottom of a coffin.  Or stitch up in the body of a dead dog.

I'll leave those to you seeing as you've brought them up.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2200 on: November 09, 2021, 02:49:49 PM »
Jesus wept, there's a very interesting trial resuming at 3pm.

Take your collective heads out of the McCanns or Amaral's butt & we could watch & discuss that instead.

Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2201 on: November 09, 2021, 03:49:45 PM »
Jesus wept, there's a very interesting trial resuming at 3pm.

Take your collective heads out of the McCanns or Amaral's butt & we could watch & discuss that instead.
No one here is particularly interested in men killing each other in the USA I'm afraid (unless they're BLM or Far Right nutters). 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2202 on: November 09, 2021, 03:58:16 PM »
No one here is particularly interested in men killing each other in the USA I'm afraid (unless they're BLM or Far Right nutters).

It was at a BLM protest.

Well, anyway, it's the most high profile case in the states right now & has split opinion between Reps & Dems, despite seemingly obvious video evidence it was justifiable self defence in all 3 instances.

At present the left wing media outlets are refusing to budge from their position that Rittenhouse is a murderer,

But, what about sedative drugs?



Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline Eleanor

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2203 on: November 09, 2021, 04:03:40 PM »
It was at a BLM protest.

Well, anyway, it's the most high profile case in the states right now & has split opinion between Reps & Dems, despite seemingly obvious video evidence it was justifiable self defence in all 3 instances.

At present the left wing media outlets are refusing to budge from their position that Rittenhouse is a murderer,

But, what about sedative drugs?

Is this pertinent to Madeleine McCann?

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: The timeline revisited
« Reply #2204 on: November 09, 2021, 04:09:23 PM »
Is this pertinent to Madeleine McCann?

Several pages back you were thinking about watching Judge Judy, such is the tedium in here.

I thought I'd offer another criminal case, since we're all interested in justice apparently, for McCann weary members to consider & offer our opinions on, but never mind.

Christian Brueckner Fan Club