Yes really. As has been pointed out ad infinitum previously, the first hour is the golden hour in any missing child case. Giving police erroneous facts from the outset was inexcusable. In fact, one could be forgiven for thinking it was intentional.
But the police were not fooled for a minute were they?
JOSE MANUEL OLIVEIRACrime reporter, 'Diario de Noticias'
Information started circulating from sources connected to the Portuguese police that the story was full of holes from the side of the McCanns and their friends. Indeed within two days of Madeleine disappearing, this crime correspondent was filing this piece in the Portuguese Daily: Diario of the Noticias:
"Headline: a badly told story." We started to receive information according to which the police suspected the theory they had apprehensions, didn't believe the theory that she had been kidnapped.
To conclude, the police started to suspect the parents from the word go. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/panorama/7106086.stmBut despite having their finger on the pulse right from the word go they still managed to make a monumental screw up of actually finding out what happened to the little three year old child who should have been the focal point of their endeavours.
Could that possibly be because those suspected by the police from the word go were actually as innocent as the absolute absence of evidence against them confirmed ... and while the police were flaffing around the real criminal or criminals were confidently consolidating their position during and long after the golden hours were incompetently frittered away confident of the police inability to touch them.