So you don’t believe any of the parents did any checks that night and are all lying do you?
No that's not what I said. I believe GM downplayed the unsecured patio doors evidenced by:
- no mention of unsecured patio doors in GNR (first respondents) wit stats
- friends and family in early hours were beating the drum about jemmied shutters
- GM claims in his wit stat of 4th May he was using front door to check not unsecured patio doors. In his 10th May wit stat he came clean.
- I believe on 3rd May JT was checking her children via the unsecured patio door. This then accounts for the fact she observed GM/JW but they didn't observe her. JT and JW both say GM/JW stood chatting outside the gate to 5A.
- RO states in her wit stat that during the day her family would exit via the patio doors thereby leaving them unsecured. She also states she didn't like the car park at night as it was dark. On this basis I choose to believe the Oldfields were also checking via the unsecured patio doors and not the front door.
- RO is a trained lawyer and may well have alerted T8 to the possibility of charges of 'child neglect' and even if she didn't I think it would immediately hit T9 how all of this was going to look: a bunch of professionals wining and dining out every evening, leaving children 'home alone' for hours at a time completely unsupervised and worst still in all likelihood not even locking the doors!