It was being used in research in 2011.
http://europepmc.org/article/med/21367548
Thanks Misty, you can be relied upon to come up with the goods.
I've had a quick glance at the link you provided and I don't know if I am taking in the full significance of this equipment as far as victim recovery dogs working in the field are concerned or is the Scent Transfer Unit (STU-100) primarily for use in the training of the dogs.
I get sticking a rod into the ground releases volatile organic compounds (VOCs) for example, which if collected might possibly be verified in a lab as residual scent from human remains but I think this is already a tried and tested method for the recovery of human remains.
I am not convinced the STU-100 was developed to locate where a body might have been and even if it had been in 2007 the research was in its infancy.
I think the ultimate value of the STU-100 is that it bypasses the requirement for VRDs to be trained using decomposing pigs but allows them to be trained exclusively on human remains in a legal and ethical manner.
What does anyone else think?
SnipAbstract
Human remains detection (HRD) canines are trained to locate human remains in a variety of locations and situations which include minimal quantities of remains that may be buried, submerged or extremely old.
The aptitude of HRD canines is affected by factors such as training, familiarity with the scent source and environmental conditions.
Access to appropriate training aids is a common issue among HRD canine handlers due to overly legal restrictions, difficulty in access and storage, and the potential biological hazards stemming from the use of actual human remains as training aids.
For this reason, we propose a unique approach of training aid creation, utilizing non-contact, dynamic air-flow odor concentration onto sorbent materials.
Following concentration, the sorbent material retains the odor from the scent source composed of volatile organic compounds.
The sorbent material containing the odor can then be utilized as a canine training aid.
Training materials prepared in this manner were tested under a variety of conditions with many HRD canines to demonstrate the efficacy of the new training aids.
A high level of correct canine responses to the new training aids was achieved, approaching 90%, with minimal false positives.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379073811004701