They didn't have to identify the window, by Bambers own admission, he could enter via a window.
I don't know how you can't see that a reconstruction doesn't identify the killer?
Kenneth Noye being found 'not guilty' is clearly a problem for your notion that the jury should visit the scene.
JB has never said he could exit a window and then secure it from outside. Most people could probably enter by using various tools to lift a catch.
I've never said a reconstruction will identify the killer. What it will do is show the correct position of NB and perp when NB sustained his upstairs gsw's. To date no expert evidence has been made available. I believe a reconstruction will place NB on the landing stairs with the perp already in the bedroom which then throws a different light on the case.
Why is KN being found not guilty a problem for my notion that a jury should visit the soc? Many high profile cases involve jurors taken to soc and other sites to enable them to understand the defence and prosecution.
In this case jurors needed to visit WHF in order for the prosecution to demonstrate what it was asserting about the window. The fact the judge told jurors it didn't matter just shows the whole trial was a sham.