Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76357 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #15 on: May 05, 2020, 04:25:03 PM »

This gives More credence to her reporting.


Did you read the blogs ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #16 on: May 05, 2020, 04:26:59 PM »

During pizza Gate

‘Pizza gate’ is a debunked conspiracy theory
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #17 on: May 05, 2020, 04:28:15 PM »

Society cannot handle the truth.

Maybe it’s you who ‘cannot handle the truth’ ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #18 on: May 05, 2020, 04:33:06 PM »

Thank you in advance for remaining polite.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #19 on: May 05, 2020, 04:53:42 PM »
I think this is very distasteful and while it doesn’t overtly accuse Nevill of being a paedophile it does imply his part in a high level cover up, and therefore in criminal activity which brought about his own and his family’s downfall, all I might add without a shred of evidence.  Will this victim blaming never cease? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #20 on: May 05, 2020, 05:11:09 PM »
Have we not just watched The Trial of Carl Beech who was sentenced to 18 years for False Testimony and in which Tom Watson was involved because he believed Carl Beech and supported his lies.

Exactly!

Offline Myster

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #21 on: May 05, 2020, 05:15:30 PM »
Have we not just watched The Trial of Carl Beech who was sentenced to 18 years for False Testimony and in which Tom Watson was involved because he believed Carl Beech and supported his lies.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/03/nick-accused-sir-edward-heath-abusing-aboard-sailing-yacht/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/07/22/nick-trial-carl-beech-found-guilty-making-westminster-vip-paedophile/
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline The General

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #22 on: May 05, 2020, 05:22:49 PM »

Sonia Poulton is in the spotlight regularly... Just not mainstream.

During pizza Gate and the FBI collusion reporters in USA would seek information from her for them to understand pizza Gate further.
Kinell Aunti Agg, Pizzagate? That's as whacky as conspiracies get.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #23 on: May 05, 2020, 05:29:07 PM »
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/10/03/nick-accused-sir-edward-heath-abusing-aboard-sailing-yacht/

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2019/07/22/nick-trial-carl-beech-found-guilty-making-westminster-vip-paedophile/

I apologise in advance if this may be offensive to some, but I am still waiting to see some definitive proof that Jimmy Savile was a Paedophile.

A very large proportion of accusations have in fact been discredited.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #24 on: May 05, 2020, 05:39:58 PM »
What the hell is Pizza Gate?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #25 on: May 05, 2020, 06:01:17 PM »
Just to be clear no one is accusing NB of being a paedophile.  The OP is asking if he had knowledge of such.



Not just of that. It could have been fraud, homosexuality, a death..
I have no idea yet what is is/was.

Question is:  could he have been the recipient of something illegal/criminal and was he killed as a result?

If that is so, taking into account the phone call he received, then my theory would/could fit into some of the unusual events that night.   

All I ask is debate with an open mind. 

I have no idea what happened inside the house..that’s where your expertise lies.

I believe a lot of evidence including the silencer is just smoke and mirrors. A mere distraction.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #26 on: May 05, 2020, 06:03:16 PM »
The question is why would he,saying that load's knew about Saville apparently.



Saville was not exposed at the time.

Interestingly, people had complained about some of his disgusting behaviour however they where ridiculed and silenced allowing Saville to continue with his perverted deeds.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #27 on: May 05, 2020, 06:06:41 PM »
AA - the two things are unrelated but while there are paedo's in all walks of life, the guy who made the paedophilic ring allegation was found out to be a fraud. There is no evidence that Nevill was ever in the FM's so your theory falls at that juncture.






Caroline, it’s not so much WHAT exactly Neville knew, or how he attained it, we will never be able to prove that on here without an investigative researcher.

Neville was in a position to mix with, or know personally a few within the establishment.  Again I have no proof.  However, it would be more likely than unlikely that he would have contacts within high places.


Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #28 on: May 05, 2020, 06:10:19 PM »
I make a point of never believing a word Sonia Poulton says.



Then that is your prerogative!

It doesn’t matter who the messenger is....there are an assortment of journalists and researchers who have come to very similar conclusions.  Sónia just happens to be one.

Forget the source...it’s the lifestyle and activities of the stablishment in the early 80’s that I’m solely focusing on. Also, the cover ups and how it was implemented.  They all follow a similar pattern.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #29 on: May 05, 2020, 06:13:47 PM »
This video is largely Libellous, especially as most of Sonia's allegations and innuendo have since been proved to have no foundation.

One victim accused Sir Edward Heath of raping him on a double bed on Morning Cloud.  Morning Cloud was a Racing Yacht, it had No Beds.



Maybe....but she has never been sued!  Never brought to court or arrested.  Why?  Because there’s a slight possibility it could be true which would open a huge can of worms.

‘. Never complain - never explain!’.  Betty Mountbatten.