Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76333 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #45 on: May 05, 2020, 06:55:42 PM »
I think we can safely say that Carl Beech is a liar and fantasist...

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/BEECH-Sentencing-Remarks-26.7.19-003.pdf


Can we? Why? Because the bbc says so?

Maybe CB was a scapegoat.  He was made an example of.

To anybody else who dares to expose abuse within the establishment, this will be your ending too.

You will be discredited, called untrustworthy, a liar and a fantasist.  In addition, you will spend the rest of your days in prison!

That’s the real message that was given out as a result of his complaints.   

There is a pattern that runss all the way through these things....similar to Sónia Poulton, John Wedger, David Icke etc.

Deliberately done in order that you never believe a thing that any of them expose.

This is precisely where people are starting to WAKE UP!  They’re turning off the tel-lie-vision and doing their own researching, continually asking questions and debating the propaganda emitted by these media whores.

It’s a bit like the Matrix....
Is it better to free your mind? Or live in blissful ignorance?

https://youtu.be/zE7PKRjrid4

Offline Common sense

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #46 on: May 05, 2020, 06:58:49 PM »
David Icke has been banging about this nonsense for years.

Why haven't the elite paedophiles bumped him off?

Why pick on little old Nevill and why murder his entire family with an elaborate plot to frame Jeremy for the crime?

Why not just arrange an accident for Nevill?

Why not just let Sheila take the blame?

Can you show a case anywhere in the world where organised satanic abuse has been proven and isn't just in the wild imagination of fantasists or children being prompted to tell tall tales, ie: Shieldfield, The Orkneys, The McMartin preschool case, Jersey care homes, Carl Beech, Sabine McNeill and the Hampstead hoax, the more ridiculous lurid tales about Jimmy Savile.. Any actual cases at all or is it all a big cover up?

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #47 on: May 05, 2020, 07:00:28 PM »
That won't stop me deleting untruths.


Untruths upon whose judgement? Yours?

Then where is the debate?

You do not have a monopoly on truth.  Your truth and my truth can be debated...

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #48 on: May 05, 2020, 07:01:05 PM »

Can we? Why? Because the bbc says so?

Maybe CB was a scapegoat.  He was made an example of.

To anybody else who dares to expose abuse within the establishment, this will be your ending too.

You will be discredited, called untrustworthy, a liar and a fantasist.  In addition, you will spend the rest of your days in prison!

That’s the real message that was given out as a result of his complaints.   

There is a pattern that runss all the way through these things....similar to Sónia Poulton, John Wedger, David Icke etc.

Deliberately done in order that you never believe a thing that any of them expose.

This is precisely where people are starting to WAKE UP!  They’re turning off the tel-lie-vision and doing their own researching, continually asking questions and debating the propaganda emitted by these media whores.

It’s a bit like the Matrix....
Is it better to free your mind? Or live in blissful ignorance?

https://youtu.be/zE7PKRjrid4

AA - David Icke believes the royal family are actually lizard people so no wonder no one would take him seriously. Social media and the like has enabled people to post any old tosh in the hope that it gets promoted so they can feel just a little more important.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #49 on: May 05, 2020, 07:06:44 PM »
So are a lot of people AA and many with greater opportunity than Nevill. The fact remains that there is no evidence that he was a FM and lots to support Jeremy killing them all.

You cannot I feel, rule something out when you have no proof of what he did or didn't know.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #50 on: May 05, 2020, 07:07:07 PM »

Untruths upon whose judgement? Yours?

Then where is the debate?

You do not have a monopoly on truth.  Your truth and my truth can be debated...

Have a care and then it won't be necessary.

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #51 on: May 05, 2020, 07:09:33 PM »
You cannot I feel, rule something out when you have no proof of what he did or didn't know.

I just can't understand how you came to this theory in the first place? How it formulated in you mind? Out of the many theories I could form around this case, the freemasons would be somewhere near the bottom of the pile.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #52 on: May 05, 2020, 07:10:22 PM »
Thanks for educating me, so this is all absolutely true is it?


We will find out only when it comes to court.  This is what the people of the USA are talking and shouting about. Cleaning the swamp.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #53 on: May 05, 2020, 07:11:53 PM »
Seriously AA - this is just fake news. Are you actually saying you believe that Hillary Clinton was sexually abusing children in satanic rituals?


I believe she is involved upto her neck in corrupt and illegal practises.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #54 on: May 05, 2020, 07:17:41 PM »
David Icke has been banging about this nonsense for years.

Why haven't the elite paedophiles bumped him off?

Why pick on little old Nevill and why murder his entire family with an elaborate plot to frame Jeremy for the crime?

Why not just arrange an accident for Nevill?

Why not just let Sheila take the blame?

Can you show a case anywhere in the world where organised satanic abuse has been proven and isn't just in the wild imagination of fantasists or children being prompted to tell tall tales, ie: Shieldfield, The Orkneys, The McMartin preschool case, Jersey care homes, Carl Beech, Sabine McNeill and the Hampstead hoax, the more ridiculous lurid tales about Jimmy Savile.. Any actual cases at all or is it all a big cover up?



We are being diverted here.

My only question was, based on the video, would it be possible that Neville COULD have been in receipt to have knowledge of another persons illegal activities.  It could be fraud...anything.

The question only requires a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’.

I haven’t even began to lay out my theory at all and discuss what I’d like to discuss and debate.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #55 on: May 05, 2020, 07:20:39 PM »
AA - David Icke believes the royal family are actually lizard people so no wonder no one would take him seriously. Social media and the like has enabled people to post any old tosh in the hope that it gets promoted so they can feel just a little more important.




A lot of what he has spoken about over the years has come true.  Loads of it is being played out this very moment...it’s right there now....but many cannot see it...and some can.

I don’t follow the lizard theory your right.  Maybe that’ll take another 50 yrs to surface.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #56 on: May 05, 2020, 07:24:14 PM »


It certainly does not!

He would only be a threat to those actively involved in criminal behaviour.  They would fear exposure byNeville and I have found NOTHING at all to suggest Neville was involved in anything I am suggesting.

In fact, it gives more credence to my theory that June was religious.  Neville remained by her side, he never strayed. MAYBE they were both aware of outside evil forces and between them they did everything they could to protect their children and grandchildren from whatever lay before them in life.

I believe they were exceptionally good parents, doing the best for their children.
If they had evidence of paedophilia amongst the high-ups and told nobody then they are guilty of collusion and cover up.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #57 on: May 05, 2020, 07:28:14 PM »


We are being diverted here.

My only question was, based on the video, would it be possible that Neville COULD have been in receipt to have knowledge of another persons illegal activities.  It could be fraud...anything.

The question only requires a ‘yes’ or a ‘no’.

I haven’t even began to lay out my theory at all and discuss what I’d like to discuss and debate.
Lots of things could have happened, like a mafia hit job, the Russians, Mossad, a burglary gone wrong, Nevill did it himself and staged it to look like he was murdered, likewise June, Prince Philip, you name it, anyone at all rather than the person to whom all the evidence points of course.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #58 on: May 05, 2020, 07:36:41 PM »

I believe she is involved upto her neck in corrupt and illegal practises.

She's a politician - they generally are but that's a little different to what she is being accused of.

Offline Myster

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #59 on: May 05, 2020, 07:38:56 PM »
AA - David Icke believes the royal family are actually lizard people so no wonder no one would take him seriously. Social media and the like has enabled people to post any old tosh in the hope that it gets promoted so they can feel just a little more important.
But Caroline you have to remember Icke was an 11 plus failure, a crap goalie, and now thinks he's the Son of the Godhead (no relation to Holly, of course).
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.