Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76334 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #210 on: May 07, 2020, 12:34:56 PM »
There really is no end  to your denial.

I'm denying you have evidence to support your belief and I'm right, you don't.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #211 on: May 07, 2020, 12:41:27 PM »
I'm denying you have evidence to support your belief and I'm right, you don't.

The evidence is in Wilkes's book. You just refuse to accept it and by not accepting it, it doesn't make Bamber any less a psychopath.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #212 on: May 07, 2020, 12:51:51 PM »
The evidence is in Wilkes's book. You just refuse to accept it and by not accepting it, it doesn't make Bamber any less a psychopath.

If Aunt Agatha met Bamber in 1990

Roger Wilkes in 1991

I first met Jeremy Bamber in the late summer of 1991, as I was pondering a book about his case. To my tentative first letter, Bamber had replied briskly, pointing out that I was not the first journalist to approach him about his story and asking me not to contact him again unless I was prepared to help.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/family/life/meetings-jeremy-bamber-white-house-farm-murderer/

What was going on between the time he was found guilty - 1990 ?

Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Common sense

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #213 on: May 07, 2020, 02:20:45 PM »
It seems like that to you, perhaps. In the real world these examples are not evidence of psychopathy.

I didn't say they were. If he hadn't gone on to massacre his entire family I would say they are meaningless

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #214 on: May 07, 2020, 02:45:43 PM »
I didn't say they were. If he hadn't gone on to massacre his entire family I would say they are meaningless

Killing isn't a symptom of psychopathy.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #215 on: May 07, 2020, 04:04:55 PM »
Don't exaggerate. Colin Caffell, who knew June Bamber, called her a monster. Lacking empathy does not a psychopath make.
Lacking empathy is a pre-requisite for a psychopath. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #216 on: May 07, 2020, 04:09:04 PM »
Killing isn't a symptom of psychopathy.
Killing is not a symptom of anything, it is an act that one usually chooses to commit, and when one does so purely for financial gain, and when killing involves the deaths of family members including children and then staging to make it look like one of your victims did it then I would say that is highly likely that the perpetrator had psychopathic tendencies.  Why would you disagree with this?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #217 on: May 07, 2020, 04:18:43 PM »
Killing isn't a symptom of psychopathy.

No but the propensity to commit murder can be a result of it. You must have twice as much hair as you initially started with!

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #218 on: May 07, 2020, 04:19:50 PM »
Killing is not a symptom of anything, it is an act that one usually chooses to commit, and when one does so purely for financial gain, and when killing involves the deaths of family members including children and then staging to make it look like one of your victims did it then I would say that is highly likely that the perpetrator had psychopathic tendencies.  Why would you disagree with this?

And so would anyone who wasn't trying to make excuses for him.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #219 on: May 07, 2020, 08:20:15 PM »
Killing is not a symptom of anything, it is an act that one usually chooses to commit, and when one does so purely for financial gain, and when killing involves the deaths of family members including children and then staging to make it look like one of your victims did it then I would say that is highly likely that the perpetrator had psychopathic tendencies.  Why would you disagree with this?

You may believe something's 'highly likely' but that doesn't make it true.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #220 on: May 07, 2020, 08:53:02 PM »
You may believe something's 'highly likely' but that doesn't make it true.
Yawn.  It makes it highly likely unless you can explain why, in your opinion, it is unlikely that killing your family including young children for your own enrichment and framing one of the victims means you have psychopathic tendencies?   Of course you won’t be able to and will just ignore the question as usual.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline John

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #221 on: May 07, 2020, 09:10:19 PM »
Killing is not a symptom of anything, it is an act that one usually chooses to commit, and when one does so purely for financial gain, and when killing involves the deaths of family members including children and then staging to make it look like one of your victims did it then I would say that is highly likely that the perpetrator had psychopathic tendencies.  Why would you disagree with this?

I would think that there are other types of mental illnesses which could be just as prevalent in this case?
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #222 on: May 07, 2020, 09:15:29 PM »
I would think that there are other types of mental illnesses which could be just as prevalent in this case?
Js psychopathy a mental illness? 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline John

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #223 on: May 07, 2020, 09:18:30 PM »
Js psychopathy a mental illness?

According to the dictionary it is.

Psychopathy:  A person suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behaviour.
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #224 on: May 07, 2020, 09:32:37 PM »
According to the dictionary it is.

Psychopathy:  A person suffering from chronic mental disorder with abnormal or violent social behaviour.
It’s a personality disorder, not a mental illness imo.  What mental illnesses have monetary greed and extreme self-centredness and violence at their root?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".