Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76393 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #330 on: May 13, 2020, 12:06:47 PM »
I'm kind, but I'm not a walkover. If people challenge me I retaliate.

I try not to.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #331 on: May 13, 2020, 12:41:07 PM »
I try not to.

I don't understand why you think it's kind to let people be nasty to you?
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #332 on: May 13, 2020, 12:45:32 PM »
Are you able to identify this other forum?

First I've heard he suffers from dyslexia.  I didn't detect anything like this in his correspondence.

Where does being bullied/bullying others come from?

He obtained 7 O levels from Greshams but flunked his A levels at Colchester college.

A former girlfriend said he was passionate about farming.

It was a Facebook forum, and I think it started when the TV series was on in January/February. I'm not on it any more, and I don't even know if it's still active.

People were discussing why JB writes in capitals, and one poster (who writes to JB regularly) said he is dyslexic.

From my years and years of teaching dyslexic children and adults, I would say that some like to write in capitals and some don't. Writing in capitals is not, as far as I'm aware, a hallmark of dyslexia.

I wondered whether JB might have been diagnosed while in prison. IF it's true that he's dyslexic, I would expect that to be the case, as it was barely known about in the days when JB was at school.

Offline APRIL

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #333 on: May 13, 2020, 12:48:58 PM »
I am 'dyslexic' with numbers (dyscalculia) and that has always been a real drawback.


Ha! So am I!! I know just where you're coming from!!!

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #334 on: May 13, 2020, 12:52:07 PM »
It was a Facebook forum, and I think it started when the TV series was on in January/February. I'm not on it any more, and I don't even know if it's still active.

People were discussing why JB writes in capitals, and one poster (who writes to JB regularly) said he is dyslexic.

From my years and years of teaching dyslexic children and adults, I would say that some like to write in capitals and some don't. Writing in capitals is not, as far as I'm aware, a hallmark of dyslexia.

I wondered whether JB might have been diagnosed while in prison. IF it's true that he's dyslexic, I would expect that to be the case, as it was barely known about in the days when JB was at school.

Thanks. 

I didn't detect anything in his correspondence to suggest he suffered any learning disability although I say this as a lay person. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #335 on: May 13, 2020, 12:54:29 PM »
I'm kind, but I'm not a walkover. If people challenge me I retaliate.

You are quite patronising - many of us have studied this case for years and read most of the documentation - probably forgot more than you  will ever know.  However, you seem to have just read CAL and although that is a good source of information you act like you know it all. You may not mean to come over this way, but that's my interpretation.

Offline APRIL

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #336 on: May 13, 2020, 12:54:47 PM »
I don't understand why you think it's kind to let people be nasty to you?


Perhaps that's why I frequently experience your answers as hostile. Might it be that you believe posters will be nasty to you if you're not?

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #337 on: May 13, 2020, 12:57:25 PM »
You are quite patronising - many of us have studied this case for years and read most of the documentation - probably forgot more than you  will ever know.  However, you seem to have just read CAL and although that is a good source of information you act like you know it all. You may not mean to come over this way, but that's my interpretation.

As you say, it's a matter of interpretation. Others see me differently.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #338 on: May 13, 2020, 01:17:23 PM »
I don't understand why you think it's kind to let people be nasty to you?

It is irrelevant.  They aren't being nasty to me personally.  I am just the figure of authority.  That is what they don't like.

I rode through that one a very long time ago.  I am now impervious.  You will get there in the end.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #339 on: May 13, 2020, 01:24:43 PM »
It is irrelevant.  They aren't being nasty to me personally.  I am just the figure of authority.  That is what they don't like.

I rode through that one a very long time ago.  I am now impervious.  You will get there in the end.

Well I'm not a figure of authority, so our situations are different.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #340 on: May 13, 2020, 01:27:59 PM »
As you say, it's a matter of interpretation. Others see me differently.

People you know maybe.

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #341 on: May 13, 2020, 01:29:51 PM »
It is irrelevant.  They aren't being nasty to me personally.  I am just the figure of authority.  That is what they don't like.

I rode through that one a very long time ago.  I am now impervious.  You will get there in the end.

Ha ing been a mod on the other forum, I never saw myself as a figure of authority. I don't mind moderators, they organise the chaos  @)(++(*

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #342 on: May 13, 2020, 01:31:22 PM »

Perhaps that's why I frequently experience your answers as hostile. Might it be that you believe posters will be nasty to you if you're not?

It seems some people interpret my posting style as hostile and others don't. I try to make my posts accurate and informative and I prefer arguments to include verifiable facts rather than opinion.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #343 on: May 13, 2020, 01:33:36 PM »
People you know maybe.

I know no-one on this forum and I have debated amicably with those whose views differ to mine.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #344 on: May 13, 2020, 01:34:56 PM »
I know no-one on this forum and I have debated amicably with those whose views differ to mine.

You have an undertone of being patronising, I am sure I am not the only one who thinks that way.