Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76424 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #345 on: May 13, 2020, 01:42:01 PM »
Well I'm not a figure of authority, so our situations are different.
.

Of course you are, whether you like it or not.  That is the point.  You don't actually have to do anything.

Offline APRIL

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #346 on: May 13, 2020, 02:24:26 PM »
I know no-one on this forum and I have debated amicably with those whose views differ to mine.

I wonder if they experience you as "amicable"? Might it be that they feel your demeaning tone denies them the right to respond?

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #347 on: May 13, 2020, 02:34:36 PM »
I wonder if they experience you as "amicable"? Might it be that they feel your demeaning tone denies them the right to respond?

G-Unit isn't demeaning anyone;  Certainly no more than you do.

Offline APRIL

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #348 on: May 13, 2020, 03:15:00 PM »
G-Unit isn't demeaning anyone;  Certainly no more than you do.


Eleanor, I'm sorry you experience me so. Perhaps you could give me an example. I would just like to say, whilst your post accuses ME of being demeaning, it was G-Unit's tone, not her person, I accredited the description to.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #349 on: May 13, 2020, 03:16:59 PM »
.

Of course you are, whether you like it or not.  That is the point.  You don't actually have to do anything.

 $*6%
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #350 on: May 13, 2020, 03:20:40 PM »

Eleanor, I'm sorry you experience me so. Perhaps you could give me an example. I would just like to say, whilst your post accuses ME of being demeaning, it was G-Unit's tone, not her person, I accredited the description to.

Not just you.  I think that most of you are awful.  And after many years on The McCann Forum that is saying something.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #351 on: May 13, 2020, 03:36:05 PM »

Eleanor, I'm sorry you experience me so. Perhaps you could give me an example. I would just like to say, whilst your post accuses ME of being demeaning, it was G-Unit's tone, not her person, I accredited the description to.

I must say I find your tone quite harsh at times too. Accusing me of 'covering up' and 'side stepping' is insulting in my opinion. It's also nothing to do with my tone; its an attempt to analyse my motives or character imo, which you know nothing about;

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11474.msg589906#msg589906
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11474.msg589874#msg589874

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline APRIL

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #352 on: May 13, 2020, 04:05:39 PM »
I must say I find your tone quite harsh at times too. Accusing me of 'covering up' and 'side stepping' is insulting in my opinion. It's also nothing to do with my tone; its an attempt to analyse my motives or character imo, which you know nothing about;

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11474.msg589906#msg589906
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11474.msg589874#msg589874

What you perceived as "harshness", G-Unit, came, probably arose out of irritation because you refused to give a straight answer to something asked of you three times, and the tone you adopted - mistakenly, in this case, one of having greater understanding than others, perhaps?- by so doing. Maybe you'd prefer the term "doing a segway"? I believe it was Eleanor who confirmed you as an authoritative figure, "whether you like it or not".

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #353 on: May 13, 2020, 04:09:21 PM »
I know no-one on this forum and I have debated amicably with those whose views differ to mine.

Yeah we don't share the same views on MM but we got on OK over the way.  I always found your posts the most reliable.

I think we first met on one of the off-topic threads about #me too where we had a feisty debate! 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline puglove

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #354 on: May 13, 2020, 04:17:51 PM »
Not just you.  I think that most of you are awful.  And after many years on The McCann Forum that is saying something.

Blimey Mitch, are you still alive? When can I have that nice sausage dog?


 8((()*/
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #355 on: May 13, 2020, 04:40:22 PM »
What you perceived as "harshness", G-Unit, came, probably arose out of irritation because you refused to give a straight answer to something asked of you three times, and the tone you adopted - mistakenly, in this case, one of having greater understanding than others, perhaps?- by so doing. Maybe you'd prefer the term "doing a segway"? I believe it was Eleanor who confirmed you as an authoritative figure, "whether you like it or not".

I don't have to confirm anything. And G-Unit is not obliged to answer your questions.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #356 on: May 13, 2020, 05:45:24 PM »
You are quite patronising - many of us have studied this case for years and read most of the documentation - probably forgot more than you  will ever know.  However, you seem to have just read CAL and although that is a good source of information you act like you know it all. You may not mean to come over this way, but that's my interpretation.

Many have studied the case for years but I think we both know of some who will never grasp as much as G-Unit has in a relatively short space of time  8(0(*
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #357 on: May 13, 2020, 05:47:41 PM »
Many have studied the case for years but I think we both know of some who will never grasp as much as G-Unit has in a relatively short space of time  8(0(*

Are you referring to Aunt Agatha Holly ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #358 on: May 13, 2020, 05:53:54 PM »
Are you referring to Aunt Agatha Holly ?

Nope.  Caro and Apes will know who I'm referring to.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #359 on: May 13, 2020, 05:56:59 PM »
Anyway ladies perhaps we could all be a little more tolerant of the posting styles of others. 
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?