Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 68474 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #405 on: May 16, 2020, 10:27:17 PM »
The Mirror claimed ‘Bamber had suffered abuse while he was at boarding school’

Aunt Agathas you stated

What info is ‘wrong’ ?



It would be illegal for me to disclose the truth but he wasn’t 11.  The tabloids info is incorrect. 

I will not be disclosing anything private that Jeremy has disclosed to me, that’s why I’m stating here, nothing I’m revealing is coming from Jeremy.  It’s my own research.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #406 on: May 16, 2020, 10:35:33 PM »
Aunt Agatha you stated


Please note, NONE of this information has been received from Jeremy to me.



It would be illegal for me to disclose the truth but he wasn’t 11.  The tabloids info is incorrect. 

I will not be disclosing anything private that Jeremy has disclosed to me, that’s why I’m stating here, nothing I’m revealing is coming from Jeremy.  It’s my own research.

So why should anything you state above be believed?

« Last Edit: May 16, 2020, 10:37:42 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #407 on: May 16, 2020, 10:40:04 PM »


It would be illegal for me to disclose the truth

Why would it be ‘illegal’ for you to disclose the truth ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #408 on: May 16, 2020, 10:40:45 PM »
Aunt Agatha you stated

So why should anything you state above be believed?



You don’t have to believe me. 

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #409 on: May 16, 2020, 10:44:42 PM »


It would be illegal for me to disclose the truth but he wasn’t 11.  The tabloids info is incorrect. 


The sexual abuse claims came from Brett Collins ergo not the tabloids
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #410 on: May 16, 2020, 10:47:58 PM »
The sexual abuse claims came from Brett Collins ergo not the tabloids



BC is a liar. I have the proof and I cannot disclose it. End of!!

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #411 on: May 16, 2020, 10:50:12 PM »


BC is a liar. I have the proof and I cannot disclose it. End of!!

I can understand why you wouldn't disclose that. I wouldn't either.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #412 on: May 16, 2020, 10:57:17 PM »


You don’t have to believe me.

You said recently you met Bamber in 1990

But here you said


At an award ceremony in Central London I was seated near someone from his solicitors office.  We spoke and the following day I posted a card to Jeremy.  That was about 1992/93.

Quite unexpectedly, I found myself visiting him some months later (with my lawyers hat on), lol.

?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #413 on: May 16, 2020, 10:58:51 PM »
I can understand why you wouldn't disclose that. I wouldn't either.

Has she already disclosed it to you Caroline ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #414 on: May 16, 2020, 11:00:43 PM »
You said recently you met Bamber in 1990

But here you said

?



I cannot recall exactly when we first started writing. I was writing to him at the time of his first Appeal.  I did not meet him immediately...I cannot recall exact dates or times, life is far too busy....and I did state approx...

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #415 on: May 16, 2020, 11:02:23 PM »
You also stated


John, if Jeremy did do it, then he made a several mistakes, the first one being contacting the police himself.

Also, the wet suit was mentioned, it being used.  Why did he give it to me to hold on to, along with the air rifle, that was also supposedly used (according to Mike and friends).

I have many things of his here......I wonder if any of these things where also used.........
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #416 on: May 16, 2020, 11:04:08 PM »
Has she already disclosed it to you Caroline ?




Jeremy has taken the newspaper to court over it.  It’s not within the public interest and it is illegal to unmask any sexual abuse survivor.   I’m only stating that what the papers stated was incorrect.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #417 on: May 16, 2020, 11:05:40 PM »
You also stated




This is 2012.  Do your views not change at all as more evidence or information becomes available?

Mine certainly does!

Offline Caroline

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #418 on: May 16, 2020, 11:09:05 PM »
Has she already disclosed it to you Caroline ?

No, I never asked about him being abused.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #419 on: May 16, 2020, 11:09:52 PM »



Jeremy has taken the newspaper to court over it.  It’s not within the public interest and it is illegal to unmask any sexual abuse survivor.   I’m only stating that what the papers stated was incorrect.

What you stated was

It would be illegal for me to disclose the truth but he wasn’t 11.
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation