Author Topic: Paedophiles in Parliament  (Read 76353 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #420 on: May 16, 2020, 11:14:24 PM »
No, I never asked about him being abused.

AA referred to Brett Collins as ‘a liar’ and claimed to have proof but she cannot disclose it



BC is a liar. I have the proof and I cannot disclose it. End of!!
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #421 on: May 16, 2020, 11:20:55 PM »



Jeremy has taken the newspaper to court over it.

Am guessing he didn’t get anywhere with it, if what you say is true ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #422 on: May 16, 2020, 11:26:29 PM »
Am guessing he didn’t get anywhere with it, if what you say is true ?



Your guess is wrong.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #423 on: May 16, 2020, 11:30:31 PM »


Your guess is wrong.

Nothings been redacted from the newspapers nor have I read any apologies given by them for the claims ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #424 on: May 16, 2020, 11:32:05 PM »



Jeremy has taken the newspaper to court over it.  It’s not within the public interest and it is illegal to unmask any sexual abuse survivor.   I’m only stating that what the papers stated was incorrect.

If what the papers have stated is incorrect why hasn’t it been corrected if Bamber has taken them to court as you claim?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #425 on: May 16, 2020, 11:39:35 PM »
If what the papers have stated is incorrect why hasn’t it been corrected if Bamber has taken them to court as you claim?



Wait and see.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #426 on: May 17, 2020, 01:04:22 PM »
This is not recent Aunt Agatha

But Jeremy’s close friend Brett Collins said there might be a reason for his demeanour:

’When Jeremy was 11 he was sexually molested by older boys and that deeply affected him.’

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3157376/Now-know-Bamber-did-Crime-writer-s-definitive-verdict-public-schoolboy-slaughtered-entire-family-30-years-ago-tried-frame-dead-sister-protested-innocence.html



As Jeremy Bamber is a proven pathological liar, as stated by the prison psychiatrist when he was on remand and diagnosed with psychopathy, we can take his claims with a pinch of salt.

Nearly all convicted criminals, admittedly paedophiles, claim they were sexually abused as a child to try and elicit sympathy in an attempt to deflect from their own heinous acts.

Going by Jeremy’s previous headmaster, he said that he wasn’t a popular pupil; he was arrogant; a bully; and not at all likeable. I can’t imagine boys picking on someone like him, who would have fought back. Why didn’t Jeremy report these boys at the time? He certainly wasn’t shy in coming forward.

IS he trying to suggest this alleged incident caused him to murder his family?
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #427 on: May 17, 2020, 01:11:55 PM »


Wait and see.


When did you last have contact with Jeremy, Agatha?
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #428 on: May 17, 2020, 04:04:00 PM »
Did anybody watch the whole video I posted? 

I can only go down the theory route if you’ve watched the video or it will never make any sense. 

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #429 on: May 17, 2020, 04:19:04 PM »
Did anybody watch the whole video I posted? 

I can only go down the theory route if you’ve watched the video or it will never make any sense.
What was the video's URL again thanks?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #430 on: May 17, 2020, 04:48:59 PM »

Offline Robittybob1

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #431 on: May 17, 2020, 04:57:10 PM »


Here it is. 


https://youtu.be/Fi_x090LGO8
Only an hour and a half to listen to it!
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Aunt Agatha

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #432 on: May 17, 2020, 06:40:40 PM »
Only an hour and a half to listen to it!


You'll never get those 90 mins back.

However, if it's the truth you're looking for then we need to know and understand the players and their behaviours at the time.

Not that much has changed tbh.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #433 on: May 18, 2020, 05:54:49 PM »

When did you last have contact with Jeremy, Agatha?

This is what she posted in 2012

I note with interest your views, beliefs and understandings regarding the relationship between Jeremy and myself.

I would like to add that our 'friendship' ended solely due to the lies and self seeking antics of Tracy Brazier from the Innocent Group.   Her behaviour I found to be unsettling and most disturbing - I found myself on unfamiliar territory when having to defend myself against her lies in order to discredit me in the eyes of Jeremy and the Campaign.

Jeremy chose to question me regarding the false accusations made against me and when I felt him lying to me down the phone I chose to walk away from him.  He did not drop me - I dropped him!!

He was someone for whom I strongly believed was wrongly imprisoned, he was alone and the nation had turned their back on this 'child killer'.  I did what I could at the time, for many years, but I should honestly add it is nothing compared to what others have done recently using the web and new technology.

When our 'friendship' ended I was deeply saddened......and I was concerned for his own well being having become more aware of the 'new' people surrounding him.  Liars, self seeking and deluded bamberettes and clever manipulators.....but I could do nothing more to help him.  Whenever I informed him of 'their' antics he tried to assure me he knew exactly what these people were like and described alot of them just as I have here.

However, after almost 20 years of befriending this man, it came as somewhat of a relief to let others take over.  I felt responsible for him for many years and it was a weight lifted the day we parted.  Today, I only hope that those around him stay, as I did, when all else is lost.

I hold no resentment against Jeremy and will not attempt to make him out to be someone he is not.  I don't feel it necessary to post his letters, our photo's etc......it was a strange relationship at the time, as he was in prison, but during our time together he was a most decent and respectable man.

I have come to believe and understand that Jeremy makes decisions based solely upon the information he receives from other in the outside world.  If the information he receives comes from somebody who dislikes me or feels threatened by my position, then the information about me will be most negative. And, if that person can have Group members support her lies, by also writing to Jeremy, then I don't stand a chance.  I refused to play the game and walked away.  Quite happily.

Should he ever be released, then he will have to come and see me as I still hold his most valuable possessions from his family.....and his own.  The truth comes out in the end.....one may just have to wait many years, but I'm in no rush at all!

I hope this gives some insight into those 20 years and gives answers to questions so far unanswered.

Recently Aunt Agatha has changed this to claiming she was ‘broken hearted’ or something like that ?!

What’s the truth?
« Last Edit: May 18, 2020, 06:01:20 PM by Nicholas »
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Nicholas

Re: Paedophiles in Parliament
« Reply #434 on: May 18, 2020, 06:15:24 PM »
This is what she posted in 2012

Recently Aunt Agatha has changed this to claiming she was ‘broken hearted’ or something like that ?!

What’s the truth?

I was concerned for his own well being having become more aware of the 'new' people surrounding him.  Liars, self seeking and deluded bamberettes and clever manipulators.....

Why would Bamber choose to have people like this ‘surrounding him’ as you claim AA ?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation