Why Hasn’t Jeremy Bamber Asked Julie Mugford To Take a Lie Detector Test?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

As Jeremy Bamber and his campaign team constantly highlight how he passed a lie detector test, and claim that this proves he isn’t lying and can’t have possibly murdered his family, it’s evident that JB believes polygraphs are infallible.

Therefore, why hasn’t he ever once asked, suggested — let alone DEMANDED — that Julie Mugford takes a polygraph test too?

Surely an innocent man incarcerated for 35 years would do absolutely ANYTHING to try and clear his name?

It isn’t even difficult to arrange a polygraph. They’re not costly; Julie could take one in Canada; and between arranging one and getting the results would take just days!

Just think: if Julie took one next week, he could possibly be FREE in just a few weeks/months!😃

Has anyone asked Jeremy why he hasn’t thought to ask?

I’m sure Julie would oblige, and if she did refuse, that could cast doubt on everything she said in evidence. So it’s a win-win for him, isn’t it?!

[G-Unit]

As Jeremy Bamber and his campaign team constantly highlight how he passed a lie detector test, and claim that this proves he isn’t lying and can’t have possibly murdered his family, it’s evident that JB believes polygraphs are infallible.

Therefore, why hasn’t he ever once asked, suggested — let alone DEMANDED — that Julie Mugford takes a polygraph test too?

Surely an innocent man incarcerated for 35 years would do absolutely ANYTHING to try and clear his name?

It isn’t even difficult to arrange a polygraph. They’re not costly; Julie could take one in Canada; and between arranging one and getting the results would take just days!

Just think: if Julie took one next week, he could possibly be FREE in just a few weeks/months!😃

Has anyone asked Jeremy why he hasn’t thought to ask?

I’m sure Julie would oblige, and if she did refuse, that could cast doubt on everything she said in evidence. So it’s a win-win for him, isn’t it?!

A polygraph has no value in the UK courts, and no-one can be forced to take one. I'm quite sure Mugford wouldn't volunteer to take one.

[John]

The polygraph could be a valuable tool in the right hands but at this stage in its development it is merely a method used to scare offenders into making admissions. The current equipment cannot distinguish a lie from the truth in every situation as human psysiology differs because of a number of factors. The claims by Terry Mullins and others are groundless imo.

So little wonder this so-called science is not allowed into our courtrooms in the UK.

[John]

It has been brought to my attention that some posters are still using inappropriate comments and remarks towards other members on the boards. Forum rules dictate that all responses should be amicable and constructive, there is no need to express any opinion or respond to any question aggressively.

Please keep this in mind guys when posting. TY

[ISpyWithMyEye]

A polygraph has no value in the UK courts, and no-one can be forced to take one. I'm quite sure Mugford wouldn't volunteer to take one.

I’m aware of that

And I know the courts wouldn’t rely on them. However, it would certainly help Jeremy Bamber’s cause if it was shown that the polygraph showed she’d lied. I know they’re not reliable, but Jeremy Bamber insists they are, so why doesn’t he ask JM to do one?

I also disagree that Julie would refuse. She came back in 2002 to testify, so I see no reason why she’d refuse to take a test.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

It has been brought to my attention that some posters are still using inappropriate comments and remarks towards other members on the boards. Forum rules dictate that all responses should be amicable and constructive, there is no need to express any opinion or respond to any question aggressively.

Please keep this in mind guys when posting. TY

I haven’t made any inappropriate comments, John — in fact, Mrs Wah said today that she hadn’t seen me make any such comments.

Holly removed my post where I said I thought Daisy was shy and timid, which I don’t feel is insulting.

[Nicholas]

I haven’t made any inappropriate comments, John — in fact, Mrs Wah said today that she hadn’t seen me make any such comments.

Holly removed my post where I said I thought Daisy was shy and timid, which I don’t feel is insulting.

Maybe Daisy reported you ?

[ISpyWithMyEye]

Maybe Daisy reported you ?

If so, she isn’t as timid and shy as I assumed...

Then again, on reflection, anyone brazen enough to make contact with a mass murderer can’t be timid, I guess...

[Vertigo Swirl]

It would be a good challenge to JM if Jeremy Bamber knew she was lying.  If she refused to take the test it might send a message that she had something to hide - when thr McCanns didn’t take a lie detector test this was considered by some to be evidence that they must be lying about something.  So, why doesn’t JB put JM on the spot in this way?  Maybe because he knows she’s not lying....

[ISpyWithMyEye]

It would be a good challenge to JM if Jeremy Bamber knew she was lying.  If she refused to take the test it might send a message that she had something to hide - when thr McCanns didn’t take a lie detector test this was considered by some to be evidence that they must be lying about something.  So, why doesn’t JB put JM on the spot in this way?  Maybe because he knows she’s not lying....

Absolutely.

If I’d been accused of such a heinous crime and convicted partially on someone’s evidence which I knew was a lie, I would move heaven and earth to force them to take a lie detector test!

Even if they are inadmissible in British courts, I’d STILL insist, because everyone including the courts would KNOW about it if she failed, and that would help your case tremendously!

I don’t know why his supporters haven’t contributed to this thread....😌

[ISpyWithMyEye]

A polygraph has no value in the UK courts, and no-one can be forced to take one. I'm quite sure Mugford wouldn't volunteer to take one.

Oh, I forgot 😌

Gunit says they’re of no value in UK courts; no-one can be forced to take one; and Julie wouldn’t volunteer to take one.

Ahhh, I see....

But Gunit, you and his supporters are so strident: so determined!

Why don’t you at least ASK Julie to take one? She can only refuse — which would be GOOD for jeremy ! That would put doubt in people’s minds that Julie had told the truth 😳

You’ll be helping his cause, Gunit.

[adam]

The CT have constantly created articles and videos against JM.

As the main witness, they could go public & ask her take a test. There is nothing to lose.

Julie would not respond but it would keep the campaign in the public eye. The CT could repeat that he passed his test & then could bad mouth Julie for not taking one.

Have never known of a convicted criminal asking a witness to take a lie detector test. But this is Jeremy Bamber, so you never know.

[G-Unit]

Oh, I forgot 😌

Gunit says they’re if no value in UK courts; no-one can be forced to take one; and Julie wouldn’t volunteer to take one.

Ahhh, I see....

But Gunit, you and his supporters are so strident: so determined!

Why don’t you at least ASK Julie to take one? She can only refuse — which would be GOOD for jeremy ! That would put doubt in people’s minds that Julie had told the truth 😳

You’ll be helping his cause, Gunit.

I think you're strident enough to ask your own questions Spy.

[John]

A polygraph has no value in the UK courts, and no-one can be forced to take one. I'm quite sure Mugford wouldn't volunteer to take one.

I'm quite sure that Julie wants nothing to do with this case and puts as much distance between herself and anything or anyone associated with Jeremy Bamber and who would blame her.  She didn't ask to be involved in his murderous crimes, in fact, she had a lucky escape.

[ISpyWithMyEye]

The CT have constantly created articles and videos against JM.

As the main witness, they could go public & ask her take a test. There is nothing to lose.

Julie would not respond but it would keep the campaign in the public eye. The CT could repeat that he passed his test & then could bad mouth Julie for not taking one.

Have never known of a convicted criminal asking a witness to take a lie detector test. But this is Jeremy Bamber, so you never know.

I agree with you, Adam.

As Jeremy Bamber is searching for any angle in order to help a hopeful future appeal, despite polygraph test results not being admissible in British Courts, the fact the judges would KNOW Julie Mugford  had either failed one, or refused to take one, would go heavily in Jeremy’s favour.

After all, part of his appeal argument that he’s innocent is that he’s always claimed Julie lied: if he can prove she failed the polygraph or refused to take one, it would certainly cast doubt in the appeal judges minds...