Who’s funding this hearing and how much has it cost ?
That dull solicitor from Quality Solicitors Jordans (impressive name 😌), Mark Newby is doing it for free, I think...pro bono. Jeremy Bamber isn’t entitled to legal aid — they've even clamped down on genuine cases — so he can only get what he’s offered. Newby just wants a bit of recognition; he knows he hasn’t a hope in hell.
The courts are sick to their teeth of JB, and his latest moan is that the police gave CAL a photograph he hasn’t seen. Tough. So he can stare at his victim? Who’s to say he wouldn’t get off on it?
He has the psychopathic arrogance to call it “a disgrace”
Never mind the FACT he shot dead two six-year-old boys in the head six times, plus his sister and parents...
Oh, he’s also coming out with “new fresh evidence” that there were two silencers.
Shame.
The one found was the one he used to murder his family: it had Sheila’s blood in it.
The court will end up banning him from making any more submissions,
Copied this from the web:
“On Friday, at an oral renewal hearing in Leeds, the high court will be asked to “review the refusal of the Crown Prosecution Service to disclose evidence they believe could undermine [the] conviction” of Jeremy Bamber according to the Guardian’s Simon Hattenstone.
Bamber’s legal representative, solicitor advocate Mark Newby of Quality Solicitors Jordans, told the paper:
“Since proceedings were issued it came to our attention that the author of the book the ITV drama was based upon [Carol Ann Lee] appears to have received material directly from the police [images of which she shared on Instagram and later deleted].”
“It cannot be right that an author has been given material that Mr Bamber’s defence team have not seen, particularly in light of the persistent refusal by the CPS to disclose specific material we have been asking for. It raises the question of whether a work of fiction is more important than justice.”
Illustrating her tellingly selective thoughts on what evidence should be released, to whom and where, in an interview with the East Anglian Daily Times in January this year, Ms Lee – whose son also worked with her on the White House Farm drama – stated:
“My personal opinion is very much that he’s guilty. He’s been in prison for 30 years and the evidence he was convicted on has not been overturned. He’s been appealing ever since he’s been in prison and nothing has come out that has been able to overturn that conviction… And for me the overriding piece of evidence, if you like, was looking at the original crime scene photographs. Without going into detail, it was obvious from one of the photographs in particular, that has never been published and should never be published, that those murders were committed by somebody who was extremely adept with a gun – who knew what they were doing.”
Responding and speaking of news of Friday’s hearing from Wakefield prison to the Guardian, Jeremy Bamber commented:
“It is disgusting that a third party was provided with documents and sensitive photographs when Essex police and the CPS have been unwilling to hand over material to our own forensic experts to prove that two silencers were recovered from the scene.”
“Despite court orders being in place for them to make full disclosure to us, which they deliberately chose to ignore, when Carol Ann Lee requested material she was given it without a second thought. Where is my justice?”
