The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?

[Holly Goodhead]

Are you able to provide evidence for the things you claim?

Are you able to provide evidence for the things you claim and suggest?  Eg on this thread and here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11518.msg591939#msg591939

[Robittybob1]

Are you able to provide evidence for the things you claim and suggest?  Eg on this thread and here http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=11518.msg591939#msg591939

I quoted from a very well known Appeal document.

I finish off asking a question, which as you know is not a  claim nor a statement.  "Did Collin Caffell have a watertight alibi for that night?" 
So what is your issue?

[Holly Goodhead]

I quoted from a very well known Appeal document.

I finish off asking a question, which as you know is not a statement.  "Did Collin Caffell have a watertight alibi for that night?" 
So what is your issue?

What aspect of the appeal doc are you now referring to?

Where's the evidence the twins were referred to as the Devil's children?

Yes CC had a watertight alibi but why on earth would he need one?  What possible motive could he have for shooting dead his former wife, in-laws and much loved young sons?

[APRIL]

What aspect of the appeal doc are you now referring to?

Where's the evidence the twins were referred to as the Devil's children?

Yes CC had a watertight alibi but why on earth would he need one?  What possible motive could he have for shooting dead his former wife, in-laws and much loved young sons?

But Robbiebobbiebooboo appears determined to find the chink -ANY chink- which will let water trickle in.

[Robittybob1]

What aspect of the appeal doc are you now referring to?

Where's the evidence the twins were referred to as the Devil's children?

Yes CC had a watertight alibi but why on earth would he need one?  What possible motive could he have for shooting dead his former wife, in-laws and much loved young sons?

You linked to a specific post above.  I found heaps of references to the fact others including Sheila had called the children that.

[Robittybob1]

What aspect of the appeal doc are you now referring to?

Where's the evidence the twins were referred to as the Devil's children?

Yes CC had a watertight alibi but why on earth would he need one?  What possible motive could he have for shooting dead his former wife, in-laws and much loved young sons?

At no time do I even suggest Colin did this so why do you ask such a question as "What possible motive could he have for shooting dead his former wife, in-laws and much loved young sons?".   
It is you that is making that suggestion, not me.

[Robittybob1]

But Robbiebobbiebooboo appears determined to find the chink -ANY chink- which will let water trickle in.

And that is how you solve the case.  You've got to look for the inconsistency.

[Brietta]

And that is how you solve the case.  You've got to look for the inconsistency.

The police checked out the inconsistencies many years ago and solved the case as a result.  Since then the evidence has never been without scrutiny for one reason or another ... so I think it has all been well covered by people who know what they are doing.

[Holly Goodhead]

At no time do I even suggest Colin did this so why do you ask such a question as "What possible motive could he have for shooting dead his former wife, in-laws and much loved young sons?".   
It is you that is making that suggestion, not me.

You need to make yourself clearer then as it seems everyone on the thread interpreted your posts as I did.

[APRIL]

And that is how you solve the case.  You've got to look for the inconsistency.

It may have slipped your notice -understandable as you're so far away- but the case was solved nearly 35 years ago.

[APRIL]

You linked to a specific post above.  I found heaps of references to the fact others including Sheila had called the children that.

It's what June referred to Sheila as being, but to the best of my knowledge, the only time Sheila ever suggested such being the case with her boys was during her first breakdown when she spoke of her fears about it with Dr Ferguson.

[APRIL]

At no time do I even suggest Colin did this so why do you ask such a question as "What possible motive could he have for shooting dead his former wife, in-laws and much loved young sons?".   
It is you that is making that suggestion, not me.

I could have sworn you very much wanted Colin, if not to have been responsible, at least to have had a hand in it. Why else do you go on, ad nauseum, about his alibi?

[Robittybob1]

It may have slipped your notice -understandable as you're so far away- but the case was solved nearly 35 years ago.

Not IMO.  Jeremy is still insisting he is innocent.  The police won't release files. and he passed a polygraph with flying colours. 

[Robittybob1]

I could have sworn you very much wanted Colin, if not to have been responsible, at least to have had a hand in it. Why else do you go on, ad nauseum, about his alibi?

Well if Jeremy is innocent who else was involved.  It would have to someone without a watertight alibi.

Involvement could be a matter of degree.  From suicide, matricide, homicide, and self-defense resulting in death.   

[APRIL]

Well if Jeremy is innocent who else was involved.  It would have to someone without a watertight alibi.

Involvement could be a matter of degree.  From suicide, matricide, homicide, and self-defense resulting in death.

But you claim that "At no time do I even suggest that Colin did this.........." yet you're trying your damndest to involve him.