Author Topic: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?  (Read 28321 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #30 on: May 28, 2020, 12:27:39 PM »

But you claim that "At no time do I even suggest that Colin did this.........." yet you're trying your damndest to involve him.
Are you not a Jeremy Bamber supporter?
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline APRIL

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #31 on: May 28, 2020, 12:30:39 PM »
Are you not a Jeremy Bamber supporter?


You're correct. I'm NOT a Jeremy supporter.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #32 on: May 28, 2020, 12:32:39 PM »

You're correct. I'm NOT a Jeremy supporter.
That explains the difference then, I'm looking for another suspect or other suspects, but you are not.
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline APRIL

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #33 on: May 28, 2020, 12:37:25 PM »
That explains the difference then, I'm looking for another suspect or other suspects, but you are not.


Are you SO determined that he's innocent that you really don't care who else you put in the frame for it, or are you just enjoying the playing detective thing.

Offline Robittybob1

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #34 on: May 28, 2020, 12:51:42 PM »

Are you SO determined that he's innocent that you really don't care who else you put in the frame for it, or are you just enjoying the playing detective thing.
I think of it as my occupation.   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166636/Bamber-slaughtered-family-25-bullets-told-girlfriend-s-going-years-investigation-leading-author-tell-exactly-happened-night-White-House-Farm-massacre.html  CAL has a section there where she spoke to Colin. 

I just wanted to know if he had an alibi for that night, and I wonder if Jeremy hadn't contacted him in order to get him involved since they (June and Neville) were discussing the adoption of his kids. 
« Last Edit: May 28, 2020, 12:53:46 PM by Robittybob1 »
Moderation
John has instructed all moderators to take a very strong line with posters who constantly breach the rules of this forum.  This sniping, goading, name calling and other various forms of disruption will cease.

Offline Holly Goodhead

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #35 on: May 28, 2020, 12:58:02 PM »
That explains the difference then, I'm looking for another suspect or other suspects, but you are not.

The defence and prosecution at trial agreed the perp was either JB or SC.

IMO you are wasting everyone's time and flooding the board with material that doesn't stand up to any sort of scrutiny.
Just my opinion of course but Jeremy Bamber is innocent and a couple from UK, unknown to T9, abducted Madeleine McCann - motive unknown.  Was J J murdered as a result of identifying as a goth?

Offline APRIL

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #36 on: May 28, 2020, 12:59:32 PM »
I think of it as my occupation.   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166636/Bamber-slaughtered-family-25-bullets-told-girlfriend-s-going-years-investigation-leading-author-tell-exactly-happened-night-White-House-Farm-massacre.html  CAL has a section there where she spoke to Colin. 

I just wanted to know if he had an alibi for that night, and I wonder if Jeremy hadn't contacted him in order to get him involved since they (June and Neville) were discussing the adoption of his kids.


Butt CAL is working from the premise that such a conversation occurred. I'm saying, as we only have Jeremy's word for everything that transpired, and every word which was spoken, there's a strong likelihood that it didn't.

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #37 on: May 28, 2020, 01:30:33 PM »

Butt CAL is working from the premise that such a conversation occurred. I'm saying, as we only have Jeremy's word for everything that transpired, and every word which was spoken, there's a strong likelihood that it didn't.


I don't think that necessarily follows.  IMO, it's just the sort of conversation they could well have had.

We'll never know for sure, though.

Offline APRIL

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #38 on: May 28, 2020, 01:39:36 PM »

I don't think that necessarily follows.  IMO, it's just the sort of conversation they could well have had.

We'll never know for sure, though.


I don't believe it is. Or at least, not in the same format that Jeremy implied. The Bambers would have been fully aware of the legal boundaries -tighter then, than now- and they had no legal jurisdiction over the children, ergo, there wouldn't have been a conversation about taking them out of Colin's care, which was what placing them in another's care would have amounted to. Jeremy just needed there to have been the sort of conversation which would stir Sheila into action.

Offline The General

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #39 on: May 28, 2020, 01:40:29 PM »
The defence and prosecution at trial agreed the perp was either JB or SC.

IMO you are wasting everyone's time and flooding the board with material that doesn't stand up to any sort of scrutiny.
But is it against the rules?
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline mrswah

  • Senior Moderator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2177
  • Total likes: 802
  • Thinking outside the box, as usual-------
Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #40 on: May 28, 2020, 01:48:11 PM »

I don't believe it is. Or at least, not in the same format that Jeremy implied. The Bambers would have been fully aware of the legal boundaries -tighter then, than now- and they had no legal jurisdiction over the children, ergo, there wouldn't have been a conversation about taking them out of Colin's care, which was what placing them in another's care would have amounted to. Jeremy just needed there to have been the sort of conversation which would stir Sheila into action.

They would have been fully aware of the legal position, yes, but Colin wasn't there to argue back/speak up for Sheila, who may  not have been able to cope with her parents on her own.

I can well imagine it happening, but, of course, it's also possible that it didn't, and Jeremy made the whole thing up. We'll never know, because there are no witnesses except Jeremy, and he isn't going to be believed, even if, on this occasion, he was telling the truth!


Offline G-Unit

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #41 on: May 28, 2020, 02:32:15 PM »
They would have been fully aware of the legal position, yes, but Colin wasn't there to argue back/speak up for Sheila, who may  not have been able to cope with her parents on her own.

I can well imagine it happening, but, of course, it's also possible that it didn't, and Jeremy made the whole thing up. We'll never know, because there are no witnesses except Jeremy, and he isn't going to be believed, even if, on this occasion, he was telling the truth!

Barbara Wilson told CAL that Nevill Bamber told her they were hoping to get custody of the twins. "They were definitely making formal arrangements" she said. [CAL p140 kindle ed]
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Caroline

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #42 on: May 28, 2020, 03:08:49 PM »
Barbara Wilson told CAL that Nevill Bamber told her they were hoping to get custody of the twins. "They were definitely making formal arrangements" she said. [CAL p140 kindle ed]

Barbara Wilson has not LOTS of conflicting statements. Like you do frequently, I am dismissing anything she has said. Pretty much of it anyway.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #43 on: May 28, 2020, 04:23:27 PM »
I think of it as my occupation.   https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3166636/Bamber-slaughtered-family-25-bullets-told-girlfriend-s-going-years-investigation-leading-author-tell-exactly-happened-night-White-House-Farm-massacre.html  CAL has a section there where she spoke to Colin. 

I just wanted to know if he had an alibi for that night, and I wonder if Jeremy hadn't contacted him in order to get him involved since they (June and Neville) were discussing the adoption of his kids.
you really could do with a different occupation then, you’re not doing a very good job in this one, imo.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline ISpyWithMyEye

Re: The Devil's Children. What was the need for this?
« Reply #44 on: May 28, 2020, 04:38:04 PM »

Butt CAL is working from the premise that such a conversation occurred. I'm saying, as we only have Jeremy's word for everything that transpired, and every word which was spoken, there's a strong likelihood that it didn't.

Especially as he’s a pathological liar
Seeking Justice for June & Nevill Bamber, Sheila Caffell & her two six-year-old twin boys who were shot dead in their heads by Psychopath, JEREMY BAMBER who must NEVER be released.