Author Topic: Why now?  (Read 73779 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Why now?
« Reply #180 on: June 07, 2020, 11:35:52 AM »
I really, really don’t get this.

If Brueckner is guilty of Madeleine’s abduction then she is almost certainly dead, and in the most horrific circumstances. It is the worse outcome for anyone interested in the case. Surely we should all be hoping against hope that this man is not the abductor ? Why is a young child’s death being used to settle old scores ?

He certainly is not guilty without evidence. He went through the window but left no trace. He had a distinctive campervan that nobody spotted  *%87
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Why now?
« Reply #181 on: June 07, 2020, 11:36:15 AM »
I really, really don’t get this.

If Brueckner is guilty of Madeleine’s abduction then she is almost certainly dead, and in the most horrific circumstances. It is the worse outcome for anyone interested in the case. Surely we should all be hoping against hope that this man is not the abductor ? Why is a young child’s death being used to settle old scores ?

I hope against hope that Maddie still alive but it's unlikely.  Maddies fate is determined and we can't change it.  In that respect I hope this man isn't guilty... But he may well be. We have to wait and see what happens next.

Offline barrier

Re: Why now?
« Reply #182 on: June 07, 2020, 12:14:40 PM »
I hope against hope that Maddie still alive but it's unlikely.  Maddies fate is determined and we can't change it.  In that respect I hope this man isn't guilty... But he may well be. We have to wait and see what happens next.

A pragmatic approach.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline barrier

Re: Why now?
« Reply #183 on: June 07, 2020, 12:16:40 PM »
What evidence rules him out then?

Prosecutors look for evidence to prosecute,which is clearly lacking here,hence the appeals.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #184 on: June 07, 2020, 12:17:22 PM »
I have read more on this case in the last few days than I have in the last few years, so i'd be the first to admit I'm not an expert on it.

I have no idea whether the new suspect is the "right guy" or not, but his extensive list of exceedingly  nasty "form", together with the fact that the German police are very interested, does, at least, ring some alarm bells.

I cannot understand the continuing bad feeling towards Kate and Gerry McCann. As far as I can see, there has never been any evidence that they had anything to do with Madeleine's disappearance. Why on earth would they have wanted the case kept in the public eye all these years, if they had anything to hide?

I thought "victim blaming" was a big "no no"  these days. As far as I can see, the McCanns are victims, as they  lost their child.  I realise they did make a mistake in leaving their children alone, but they are not the only parents to have done so.  Very few have to serve a life sentence as a result, as they are having to do.
8@??)(
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #185 on: June 07, 2020, 12:19:17 PM »
Prosecutors look for evidence to prosecute,which is clearly lacking here,hence the appeals.
You haven’t answered the question.  You have decided he’s about as likely to have committed the crime as a dead monk from the 19th century.  That means you must have some very strong evidence to convince you that he didn’t do it.  What is it?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Why now?
« Reply #186 on: June 07, 2020, 12:22:02 PM »
You haven’t answered the question.  You have decided he’s about as likely to have committed the crime as a dead monk from the 19th century.  That means you must have some very strong evidence to convince you that he didn’t do it.  What is it?

Maybe it''s because of that glaring absence of any real abduction evidence, save for the fact that Maddie disappeared.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline barrier

Re: Why now?
« Reply #187 on: June 07, 2020, 12:23:01 PM »
You haven’t answered the question.  You have decided he’s about as likely to have committed the crime as a dead monk from the 19th century.  That means you must have some very strong evidence to convince you that he didn’t do it.  What is it?

Simples,no one has any concrete evidence he entered 5a,until such time,I'll maintain his presumption of innocence,knocked her down and disposed of is another matter.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #188 on: June 07, 2020, 12:26:21 PM »
Simples,no one has any concrete evidence he entered 5a,until such time,I'll maintain his presumption of innocence,knocked her down and disposed of is another matter.
Again, you are missing the point.  Your previous statement comparing his likely involvement with that of Rasputin would seem to me to indicate that you think the likelihood of his involvement is close to zero.  Would you say the same about Gerry McCann, being as likely as Rasputing to have hidden her body?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: Why now?
« Reply #189 on: June 07, 2020, 12:27:24 PM »
The Portuguese press broke the news that Christian Brueckner was given the information by an Ocean Club employee that the McCann apartment was left unlocked.

Snip
PORTUGAL
Ocean Club employee reported McCann habits to suspect Maddie's abduction
08:37 by  SATURDAY0
PJ and the German police identify an employee who told Brueckner that English couples left valuable assets in their homes.

The suspect's goal was to carry out a robbery, but he saw the children and decided to take the older one.

Christian Brueckner's mobile phone number has been in the process since 2007.
It is one of the devices that were activated in the vicinity of the village where Maddie disappeared, but only after Brueckner told a German friend that he knew what had happened to the English girl is that the PJ managed to connect the contact.
A former employee of the Ocean Club, in Praia da Luz, in Lagos, had it on his personal agenda and revealed who it belonged to: a 30-year-old German, who lived nearby and had no known profession.
https://www.sabado.pt/portugal/detalhe/empregado-do-ocean-club-denunciava-habitos-dos-mccann-a-suspeito-do-rapto-de-maddie?ref=DET_relacionadas_portugal
___________________________________________________________

Amigo do Ocean Club dá rotinas sobre ingleses
•   Correio da Manhã Weekend
•   7 Jun 2020
•   TÂNIA LARANJO NOTÍCIA EXCLUSIVA DA EDIÇÃO EM PAPEL
Menina inglesa desapareceu de um aldeamento turístico na praia da Luz 2 Christian Brueckner, de 43 anos, é suspeito do crime 3 Maddie tinha 3 anos
Onúmero de telemóvel de Christian Brueckner existe no processo desde 2007. É um dos aparelhos que foram acionados nas imediações do aldeamento de onde desapareceu Madd...
https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/empregado-do-ocean-club-denunciava-habitos-dos-mccann-a-suspeito-do-rapto-de-maddie?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques





"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Why now?
« Reply #190 on: June 07, 2020, 12:29:07 PM »
The Portuguese press broke the news that Christian Brueckner was given the information by an Ocean Club employee that the McCann apartment was left unlocked.

Snip
PORTUGAL
Ocean Club employee reported McCann habits to suspect Maddie's abduction
08:37 by  SATURDAY0
PJ and the German police identify an employee who told Brueckner that English couples left valuable assets in their homes.

The suspect's goal was to carry out a robbery, but he saw the children and decided to take the older one.

Christian Brueckner's mobile phone number has been in the process since 2007.
It is one of the devices that were activated in the vicinity of the village where Maddie disappeared, but only after Brueckner told a German friend that he knew what had happened to the English girl is that the PJ managed to connect the contact.
A former employee of the Ocean Club, in Praia da Luz, in Lagos, had it on his personal agenda and revealed who it belonged to: a 30-year-old German, who lived nearby and had no known profession.
https://www.sabado.pt/portugal/detalhe/empregado-do-ocean-club-denunciava-habitos-dos-mccann-a-suspeito-do-rapto-de-maddie?ref=DET_relacionadas_portugal
___________________________________________________________

Amigo do Ocean Club dá rotinas sobre ingleses
•   Correio da Manhã Weekend
•   7 Jun 2020
•   TÂNIA LARANJO NOTÍCIA EXCLUSIVA DA EDIÇÃO EM PAPEL
Menina inglesa desapareceu de um aldeamento turístico na praia da Luz 2 Christian Brueckner, de 43 anos, é suspeito do crime 3 Maddie tinha 3 anos
Onúmero de telemóvel de Christian Brueckner existe no processo desde 2007. É um dos aparelhos que foram acionados nas imediações do aldeamento de onde desapareceu Madd...
https://www.cmjornal.pt/portugal/detalhe/empregado-do-ocean-club-denunciava-habitos-dos-mccann-a-suspeito-do-rapto-de-maddie?ref=HP_PrimeirosDestaques
Again, I always suspected this was done with the help of an insider tip-off. 
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: Why now?
« Reply #191 on: June 07, 2020, 12:56:34 PM »
Again, I always suspected this was done with the help of an insider tip-off.

As more information becomes available it couldn't be made any clearer that Scotland Yard took exactly the right course of action when they interviewed burglars and Ocean Club employees as part of their investigative strategy.

That was the profile they were working to because they knew the evidence was that Madeleine had been abducted.

Correio da Manhã have also picked up on the importance of the phone calls made in the village that night.  One only has to read the files to see whose phones and whose calls commanded the absolute attention of the Portuguese investigation.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline Wonderfulspam

Re: Why now?
« Reply #192 on: June 07, 2020, 01:05:01 PM »
As more information becomes available it couldn't be made any clearer that Scotland Yard took exactly the right course of action when they interviewed burglars and Ocean Club employees as part of their investigative strategy.

That was the profile they were working to because they knew the evidence was that Madeleine had been abducted.

Correio da Manhã have also picked up on the importance of the phone calls made in the village that night.  One only has to read the files to see whose phones and whose calls commanded the absolute attention of the Portuguese investigation.

People use mobile phones every day, that doesn't mean that Maddie was abducted.
Christian Brueckner Fan Club

Offline kizzy

Re: Why now?
« Reply #193 on: June 07, 2020, 03:28:21 PM »
I would be.  But then there has been far too much of that associated with The PJ.

We can only be thankful that it didn't happen to Kate McCann.

I didn't think that would happen for one minute there were too many people involved - the mccs made sure of that

Offline sadie

Re: Why now?
« Reply #194 on: June 07, 2020, 03:46:38 PM »
There is no evidence of a burglar or anybody going through the bedroom window as he reportedly used. You cannot convict somebody without evidence!

Where does it say that CK CB went thru the window of 5A ?   Have you made that up ?