Why now?

[pathfinder73]

Where does it say that CK went thru the window of 5A ?   Have you made that up ?

No I have not made it up! Reports said he used the window in previous break-ins. There was no evidence of anybody passing through the McCann bedroom window.

Madeleine McCann suspect 'climbed through open windows in holiday flats', rape trial told
Christian Brueckner, in jail for raping a 72-year-old woman
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-suspect-climbed-through-22144222

[jassi]

No I have not made it up! Reports said he used the window in previous break-ins. There was no evidence of anybody passing through the McCann bedroom window.

Madeleine McCann suspect 'climbed through open windows in holiday flats', rape trial told
Christian Brueckner, in jail for raping a 72-year-old woman
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/madeleine-mccann-suspect-climbed-through-22144222

An off the wall thought.
Following his successful Rape of an elderly woman, could he have bee scoping out Mrs Fenn as a possible victim ? She did report a burglary attempt in early 2007

[kizzy]

My main concern on all this s not about confession s who he is what he has done - he is a nasty piece of work

It is if he is going to end up a scapegoat the way things are going - It gets less credible by the day.

Going back to Basics Why would a 6ft man climb out a window - if he had been watching he'd know the drill.

Straight in and out through the door - PJ would have his DNA/fingerprints.

Going back to basics again - there is not one shred of evidence of abduction or him being in there.

As gmcc said nothing valuable was stolen - yet amongst other things he was a thief, not an abductor

[Eleanor]

An off the wall thought.
Following his successful Rape of an elderly woman, could he have bee scoping out Mrs Fenn as a possible victim ? She did report a burglary attempt in early 2007

Oh My God.

[jassi]

Oh My God.

Why that reaction ?

He's clearly a despicable person with form for that sort of thing.

[faithlilly]

About what?  Who is being nasty to whom at the moment?

I am only delighted to discover that you all believe in Innocent Until Proven Guilty, albeit a bit late in the day.

Maybe it’s because I’ve been away for a while but the  ‘I told you so’ gloating of some over the last couple of days has absolutely sickened me to my stomach. Post after post of supporters trying to convince anyone reading that the police definitely have their ‘finger on the pulse’ and that this man’s guilt is almost a done deal. Are you really all forgetting that if Brueckner is guilty then the parents are most certainly innocent but a small child has almost certainly died in horrific circumstances. No one is a winner here but to read some posts you wouldn’t know that.

[Eleanor]

Maybe it’s because I’ve been away for a while but the  ‘I told you so’ gloating of some over the last couple of days has absolutely sickened me to my stomach. Post after post of supporters trying to convince anyone reading that the police definitely have their ‘finger on the pulse’ and that this man’s guilt is almost a done deal. Are you really all forgetting that if Brueckner is guilty then the parents are most certainly innocent but a small has almost certainly died in horrific circumstances. No one is a winner here but to read some posts you wouldn’t know that.

I don't believe that it is a done deal, but then nor do I understand your outrage.  Nor have I seen any gloating.  Only some shock and horror offered in defence of a dreadful article.

We, the Supporters, have been forced to deal with dreadful things said about The McCanns and mostly handled this with some grace.  This is what this Forum is all about.

By the way, we still have no proof that Madeleine is dead.  And we won't be discussing Horrific Circumstances.

Thank You, in advance.  I won't be having it, no matter what.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Maybe it’s because I’ve been away for a while but the  ‘I told you so’ gloating of some over the last couple of days has absolutely sickened me to my stomach. Post after post of supporters trying to convince anyone reading that the police definitely have their ‘finger on the pulse’ and that this man’s guilt is almost a done deal. Are you really all forgetting that if Brueckner is guilty then the parents are most certainly innocent but a small child has almost certainly died in horrific circumstances. No one is a winner here but to read some posts you wouldn’t know that.

And you have the gall to talk of faux outrage.  What a load of it just there ^^^   

[faithlilly]

I don't believe that it is a done deal, but then nor do I understand your outrage.  Nor have I seen any gloating.  Only some shock and horror offered in defence of a dreadful article.

We, the Supporters, have been forced to deal with dreadful things said about The McCanns and mostly handled this with some grace.  This is what this Forum is all about.

By the way, we still have no proof that Madeleine is dead.  And we won't be discussing Horrific Circumstances.

Thank You, in advance.  I won't be having it, no matter what.

I’m sorry Eleanor but the parents are not your relatives or your friends..they are strangers whose image has been fed to you through the prism of the media and PR companies, they’re absolutely nothing to do with you so why would you have to ‘deal’ with dreadful things said about them ?

And with the greatest respect if you can’t see the gloating then you really aren’t looking hard enough.

[misty]

I’m sorry Eleanor but the parents are not your relatives or your friends..they are strangers whose image has been fed to you through the prism of the media and PR companies, they’re absolutely nothing to do with you so why would you have to ‘deal’ with dreadful things said about them ?

And with the greatest respect if you can’t see the gloating then you really aren’t looking hard enough.

By proxy, all those who have supported the McCanns' version of events online over the years have been labelled morally bankrupt & paedophile enablers. If this horrific scenario proves to be the true & final conclusion to the case then supporters won't have to look into their souls & question personal judgement & comments about the misfortune of others. We didn't hope for this probable outcome but it's always been there, bubbling just under the surface.
How will you justify your judgement or will you (like Martin Grime) just "move on" because it let you down?

[Brietta]

Mark Williams-Thomas
@mwilliamsthomas
·
19h
Update: the individual named extensively as being user of the mobile number that called the suspect has been spoken with & states he has never had that number, nor ever been visited by police.  The name is very common in Portugal.  #MadeleineMcCann
___________________________________


Mark Williams-Thomas
@mwilliamsthomas
Update: an additional user  a female has been linked to the mobile number released by the police that called the suspect on the evening #MadeleineMcCann vanished. It is certainly a concern why police had not identified these people

[faithlilly]

By proxy, all those who have supported the McCanns' version of events online over the years have been labelled morally bankrupt & paedophile enablers. If this horrific scenario proves to be the true & final conclusion to the case then supporters won't have to look into their souls & question personal judgement & comments about the misfortune of others. We didn't hope for this probable outcome but it's always been there, bubbling just under the surface.
How will you justify your judgement or will you (like Martin Grime) just "move on" because it let you down?

You seem to be under the erroneous impression that I would want or need to justify my judgement...to who...you ?

I was able to objectively evaluate the evidence and find the parents wanting because protecting them were never my main focus. Can you truly say the same ?

[Vertigo Swirl]

“Objectively evaluate the evidence” - LOL.

[misty]

You seem to be under the erroneous impression that I would want or need to justify my judgement...to who...you ?

I was able to objectively evaluate the evidence and find the parents wanting because protecting them were never my main focus. Can you truly say the same ?

To yourself, Faith, no-one else. You, like most of us, never saw all the evidence.
You appear imo to have never had any hope for Madeleine, the little girl who truly mattered in this sorry mess.

[Wonderfulspam]

To yourself, Faith, no-one else. You, like most of us, never saw all the evidence.
You appear imo to have never had any hope for Madeleine, the little girl who truly mattered in this sorry mess.

What use is hope?

Will 'hope' ever bring Maddie back?