Why now?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Are those the only possibilities you can think of? I don't subscribe to any of them.

Suggest some more credible reasons then.

[Carana]

It doesn't matter what I think, but I don't see strong evidence pointing to abduction. Consequently I don't understand why the remit for Operation Grange was to investigate an abduction.

Wouldn't the initial scoping exercise have examined that possibility?

[G-Unit]

Wouldn't the initial scoping exercise have examined that possibility?

There was no definitive evidence of abduction to find imo.

[Mr Gray]

There was no definitive evidence of abduction to find imo.

there was no definitive evidence susan pillay was murdered..comnclusions can be reached a sto what is most likely despite no definitive evidence

[Wonderfulspam]

There was no definitive evidence of abduction to find imo.

If there was, this evidence proved two things, that someone definitely abducted Madeleine, & that, that person(s) was definitely unknown to the McCanns.

Short of a written letter by the abductor saying he did it & definitely doesn't know the McCanns I'm not sure what this evidence could be.

Maybe forum members have some suggestions?

[Wonderfulspam]

there was no definitive evidence susan pillay was murdered..comnclusions can be reached a sto what is most likely despite no definitive evidence

Yes, & like the dog alerts in that case incriminated Gilroy, the dog alerts in the McCann case incriminate..... Brueckner????!

[Mr Gray]

Yes, & like the dog alerts in that case incriminated Gilroy, the dog alerts in the McCann case incriminate..... Brueckner????!

Mark Harrison gave the game away when he first says the alerts may indicate where a body has been and then says no inferenve can be drawn from them
The defence always like an expert witness who contradicts himself..

[Wonderfulspam]

Mark Harrison gave the game away when he first says the alerts may indicate where a body has been and then says no inferenve can be drawn from them
The defence always like an expert witness who contradicts himself..

In Scotland the police see a dog alert & conclude that might indicate the presence of cadaver.

English police look at alerts & conclude abduction is the only logical & plausible scenario apparently.

[Mr Gray]

In Scotland the police see a dog alert & conclude that might indicate the presence of cadaver.

English police look at alerts & conclude abduction is the only logical & plausible scenario apparently.

Looks like the English police are right.. I'm looking forward
 to the explanation from Grime when the evidence is, revealed that proves Maddue did not die in the, apartment

[Wonderfulspam]

Looks like the English police are right.. I'm looking forward
 to the explanation from Grime when the evidence is, revealed that proves Maddue did not die in the, apartment

I know, you're looking forward to the trial.

So am I, Brueckner's defence team have over 8000 sightings of a living Maddie to present as evidence, so it's going to be a long trial.

[G-Unit]

Looks like the English police are right.. I'm looking forward
 to the explanation from Grime when the evidence is, revealed that proves Maddue did not die in the, apartment

I think you'll wait a long time for that, because Grime never claimed she did.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Are those the only possibilities you can think of? I don't subscribe to any of them.

Suggest some more credible reasons then - please.

[Mr Gray]

I think you'll wait a long time for that, because Grime never claimed she did.

Grime claimed that Eddie only alerted to things McCann.. He claimed Eddies behavior changed significantly on entering 5a... He claims that where Eddie alerts no one has ever turned out subsequently to be alive.  Thsts a strange claim but he made it.

Grime used the video of Eddie alerting in Luz to impress Lenny Harper

Wolters has proof MM did not die in the apt... Imo

Grime has never commented on Amarals claims.. That's something I would criticise him for

[G-Unit]

Grime claimed that Eddie only alerted to things McCann.. He claimed Eddies behavior changed significantly on entering 5a... He claims that where Eddie alerts no one has ever turned out subsequently to be alive.  Thsts a strange claim but he made it.

Grime used the video of Eddie alerting in Luz to impress Lenny Harper

Wolters has proof MM did not die in the apt... Imo

Grime has never commented on Amarals claims.. That's something I would criticise him for

Grime didn't need to claim that Eddie only alerted to things McCann, the fact is that's the truth. If a dog handler says his dog's behaviour changed why disbelieve him? He knows his dog and you don't. Do you know of anyone turning up alive following alerts by Eddie? If not, then Grime was probably telling the truth.

Your determination to slur Grime is clear but unfounded imo. As to your claims with regard to Wolters; they are getting increasingly desperate imo.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Grime didn't need to claim that Eddie only alerted to things McCann, the fact is that's the truth. If a dog handler says his dog's behaviour changed why disbelieve him? He knows his dog and you don't. Do you know of anyone turning up alive following alerts by Eddie? If not, then Grime was probably telling the truth.

Your determination to slur Grime is clear but unfounded imo. As to your claims with regard to Wolters; they are getting increasingly desperate imo.

This thread is about the motivations wrt to Grange and the German investigation pursuing stranger abduction, specifically Brückner. Can you please answer my on-topic question, asked twice now.