Why now?

[Wonderfulspam]

Fortunately, I think that you are of no consequence.  And therefor to be ignore.

Oh right, that must be why you read my posts.
Because you're ignoring them.

[G-Unit]

Is that the sum of your oft stated "evidence"!!!

You are reliant on non verbatim statements to sustain your prejudices ... really not good enough.

And what on earth are your meanderings about a chance encounter on the street all about.

Jane was there.  She saw the two men in conversation.  They did not see her.   So what!

There is no evidence of anything there barring extreme bias.  I asked for evidence - please post some.

It's merely a part of the circumstantial evidence which has been ignored and criticised. It has nothing to do with non verbatim statements or with prejudices, which I take exception to. You know as well as I that there was circumstantial evidence, because you've spent years trying to deny it's existence using the same old tired arguments.

[Brietta]

It's merely a part of the circumstantial evidence which has been ignored and criticised. It has nothing to do with non verbatim statements or with prejudices, which I take exception to. You know as well as I that there was circumstantial evidence, because you've spent years trying to deny it's existence using the same old tired arguments.

You evidence that you have absolutely no conception of what constitutes evidence let alone circumstantial evidence.

Which is why you are unable to provide any examples in support of your prejudices.

[Vertigo Swirl]

It's merely a part of the circumstantial evidence which has been ignored and criticised. It has nothing to do with non verbatim statements or with prejudices, which I take exception to. You know as well as I that there was circumstantial evidence, because you've spent years trying to deny it's existence using the same old tired arguments.

If the PJ doubted JT's truthfulness or accuracy that's purely down to Portuguese incompetence and the inability for one force (The GNR) to communicate efficiently with the other (PJ).  Trotman came forward at the time and was ignored as the police preferred to believe the worst of JT and the Tapas group. And for this Jane et al are STILL being dragged through the mud by the likes of yourself. 

[Carana]

A reconstitution is different from a reconstruction. The former replays the events described in their statements using the original people involved. It's private, part of the investigation and it tests the feasability of the statements. The latter uses actors and is used for public appeals.

You saw 'agree to disagree' I saw no such thing. I saw a complete disregard for and overruling of a witness's opinion. 

Jane Tanner said;

That could have been that for me because the pyjamas I really tried to, it was in the interview the next day when they really pushed me you know I think you call it cognitive interview or whatever,

If by 'next day' she means 4th May, no UK police were present.

I can't say I've come across the term in English in a policing context, except in Maddie forumland, possibly by people whose mother tongue wasn't English.

[Eleanor]

It's merely a part of the circumstantial evidence which has been ignored and criticised. It has nothing to do with non verbatim statements or with prejudices, which I take exception to. You know as well as I that there was circumstantial evidence, because you've spent years trying to deny it's existence using the same old tired arguments.

The same old tired arguments are only yours.  There are no other others.  You have proof of nothing.

And your comments are now coming close to Libel.  Which I will fight if I must.

Never underestimate me. 

[Wonderfulspam]

The same old tired arguments are only yours.  There are no other others.  You have proof of nothing.

And your comments are now coming close to Libel.  Which I will fight if I must.

Never underestimate me. 

Yeah, with respect Eleanor,  I think you're being a bit selective with the whole moderation thing here.

Your response to suspected libel, is to post personal insults?

I think you'll find that's against forum rules.

[Vertigo Swirl]

  Don’t you just love it when the forum WUM who has had more warnings than the rest of us put together suddenly becomes a stickler for the rules?  Priceless!

[Wonderfulspam]

Don’t you just love it when the forum WUM who has had more warnings than the rest of us put together suddenly becomes a stickler for the rules?  Priceless!

I thought you were in favour of equality, now all of a sudden you oppose it?

[Wonderfulspam]

So can we all just call each other nasty things with impunity now?

Or is it only Eleanor that's permitted?

I think we need some clarification on this issue.

[Eleanor]

Yeah, with respect Eleanor,  I think you're being a bit selective with the whole moderation thing here.

Your response to suspected libel, is to post personal insults?

I think you'll find that's against forum rules.

Try me.  Report my Comment.

I have no comprehension of your prose, if you can call it that.  Speaking English might help.

[Eleanor]

So can we all just call each other nasty things with impunity now?

Or is it only Eleanor that's permitted?

I think we need some clarification on this issue.

Indeed we do.  Try speaking English for a start.  Your English is abysmal.

[Wonderfulspam]

Try me.  Report my Comment.

I have no comprehension of your prose, if you can call it that.  Speaking English might help.

You seem to comprehend everything else I've posted recently, but you're struggling now.

You're telling me to report you, so obviously you understand what I said, but you're also saying you don't.

Have you had a stroke?

[Eleanor]

You seem to comprehend everything else I've posted recently, but you're struggling now.

You're telling me to report you, so obviously you understand what I said, but you're also saying you don't.

Have you had a stroke?

I largely ignore you.  Or is that what bothers you?

What is a stroke?  I don't understand this.

[G-Unit]

I can't say I've come across the term in English in a policing context, except in Maddie forumland, possibly by people whose mother tongue wasn't English.

Different names for different processes.