“A Laughable Story”

[G-Unit]

So, what is the ‘sceptics’ stance with reference to ‘supporters’?

I can only speak for myself and I think they are entitled to believe in the McCanns if they want to. What they aren't entitled to do is criticise anyone who doesn't share their views and suggest that they are lacking in some way. I don't care what they think of me, because I know it's false, but I find their opinions of Portugal, their Judiciary and their police forces quite distasteful.

[Vertigo Swirl]

I can only speak for myself and I think they are entitled to believe in the McCanns if they want to. What they aren't entitled to do is criticise anyone who doesn't share their views and suggest that they are lacking in some way. I don't care what they think of me, because I know it's false, but I find their opinions of Portugal, their Judiciary and their police forces quite distasteful.

I trust you find certain sceptics’ opinions of the McCanns, their family, Clarence Mitchell, The Tapas group, the Met, the German prosecutor etc equally distateful?  Nah, didn’t think so.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Basically supporters of child neglect, "sheeple" who can't see the real truth, worship the McCanns, are blind sighted by MSM, don't believe that the  McCann have influence on Prime Ministers, the press etc

don’t forget the new one - delighted to think CB abused and murdered Madeleine.

[Brietta]

I can only speak for myself and I think they are entitled to believe in the McCanns if they want to. What they aren't entitled to do is criticise anyone who doesn't share their views and suggest that they are lacking in some way. I don't care what they think of me, because I know it's false, but I find their opinions of Portugal, their Judiciary and their police forces quite distasteful.

Do you have any inkling of what you are saying about yourself by your use of the phraseology ... "believe in the McCanns"?

[faithlilly]

Just from the press and can you blame any one?
The " researchers" would be in full speed searching births, marriages, any personal details to be found of anyone.foolish enough to give a name.

Indeed, that’s what happened to me. Unfortunately the supporter got the wrong person and the manager of some poor physiotherapist in a Glasgow hospital was connected. I’ve often wondered what her manager thought...probably ‘ we’ve got a right heid the baw here’.

[Erngath]

Indeed, that’s what happened to me. Unfortunately the supporter got the wrong person and the manager of some poor physiotherapist in a Glasgow hospital was connected. I’ve often wondered what her manager thought...probably ‘ we’ve got a right heid the baw here’.

I was actually referring to the ultimate researchers into the truth of Madeleine's disappearance.
Those on the CMOMM......those who know the truth and who "research" birth certificates, marriage certificates and write letters to the employers of any of Madeleine's family or friends.

[Erngath]

don’t forget the new one - delighted to think CB abused and murdered Madeleine.

Yes, but I really, really hope no sceptic does believe that.

[Vertigo Swirl]

Yes, but I really, really hope no sceptic does believe that.

Well they must be saying it to goad then, unless they really are that twisted.

[Erngath]

Well they must be saying it to goad then, unless they really are that twisted.

Some to goad, and some are that twisted!

[Vertigo Swirl]

I can only speak for myself and I think they are entitled to believe in the McCanns if they want to. What they aren't entitled to do is criticise anyone who doesn't share their views and suggest that they are lacking in some way. I don't care what they think of me, because I know it's false, but I find their opinions of Portugal, their Judiciary and their police forces quite distasteful.

Don’t you think I am lacking in any way?  You see, I do find that some people with certain opinions can be cruel,  racist, sexist, delusional, bonkers, misguided, ignorant, malicious, hypocritical, paranoid etc etc etc.  Am I not permitted to criticise these views or should I respect all opinions on any subject as having equal value and deserving of respect no matter what?

[Brietta]

Indeed, that’s what happened to me. Unfortunately the supporter got the wrong person and the manager of some poor physiotherapist in a Glasgow hospital was connected. I’ve often wondered what her manager thought...probably ‘ we’ve got a right heid the baw here’.

I have seen you mention this incident before and wondered at the time how you became aware of it. 

How did the recipient or the recipient's manager know who you were and how to contact you?

Were they better 'researchers' than "the supporter" who managed to miss you so entirely to target them instead of you?

[G-Unit]

Don’t you think I am lacking in any way?  You see, I do find that some people with certain opinions can be cruel,  racist, sexist, delusional, bonkers, misguided, ignorant, malicious, hypocritical, paranoid etc etc etc.  Am I not permitted to criticise these views or should I respect all opinions on any subject as having equal value and deserving of respect no matter what?

Only those with certain opinions? Are those with different opinions never guilty of being cruel,  racist, sexist, delusional, bonkers, misguided, ignorant, malicious, hypocritical, paranoid etc etc etc?

[Vertigo Swirl]

Only those with certain opinions? Are those with different opinions never guilty of being cruel,  racist, sexist, delusional, bonkers, misguided, ignorant, malicious, hypocritical, paranoid etc etc etc?

It was a general question, not limited to the McCann case.  I didn’t expect a straight  answer from you and you haven’t disappointed.  In any case I’m not the one trying to shut down criticism of others’ views - if you think  my views are cruel, racist, sexist, delusional  etc I have no problem in being confronted with your opinion and challenging it. You claim you’re not entitled to do so however.

[G-Unit]

Do you have any inkling of what you are saying about yourself by your use of the phraseology ... "believe in the McCanns"?

Accepting the open shutters and window as a fact involves believing in the McCann's truthfulness, because there's no independent testimony.

[G-Unit]

It was a general question, not limited to the McCann case.  I didn’t expect a straight  answer from you and you haven’t disappointed.  In any case I’m not the one trying to shut down criticism of others’ views - if you think  my views are cruel, racist, sexist, delusional  etc I have no problem in being confronted with your opinion and challenging it. You claim you’re not entitled to do so however.

Why mention 'certain opinions' then? I'm not worried by criticism of other's views, it's criticism of other's characters and morality which I find distasteful.