Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300250 times)

0 Members and 27 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1665 on: October 19, 2020, 05:14:57 PM »
We do know that Brueckner has been active on the dark web in connection with his activities along with other perverts, many of whom have been tracked down.
And in my opinion that is relevant.

Dark web child abuse: Hundreds arrested across 38 countries
Published16 October 2019
More than 300 people have been arrested following the take-down of one of the world's "largest dark web child porn marketplaces", investigators said.

The site had more than 200,000 videos which had collectively been downloaded more than a million times.

It was shut down last year after a UK investigation into a child sex offender uncovered its existence.

But on Wednesday, officials revealed that 337 suspected users had been arrested across 38 countries.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-50073092

I am intrigued that it was found necessary to highlight any of these perverts in general but that you specifically chose to highlight the case of the perpetrator you did.

I thought it might have been a subliminal nod at comparing doctors and the paedophile.  It couldn't possibly be that though, could it?

His criminal friend said Brueckner used the dark web. There is no other evidence that he did....so no, we don’t know that Brueckner was active on the dark web.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1666 on: October 19, 2020, 05:25:30 PM »
We do know that Brueckner has been active on the dark web in connection with his activities along with other perverts, many of whom have been tracked down.
And in my opinion that is relevant.

Dark web child abuse: Hundreds arrested across 38 countries
Published16 October 2019
More than 300 people have been arrested following the take-down of one of the world's "largest dark web child porn marketplaces", investigators said.

The site had more than 200,000 videos which had collectively been downloaded more than a million times.

It was shut down last year after a UK investigation into a child sex offender uncovered its existence.

But on Wednesday, officials revealed that 337 suspected users had been arrested across 38 countries.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-50073092

I am intrigued that it was found necessary to highlight any of these perverts in general but that you specifically chose to highlight the case of the perpetrator you did.

I thought it might have been a subliminal nod at comparing doctors and the paedophile.  It couldn't possibly be that though, could it?
of course it was.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Myster

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1667 on: October 19, 2020, 07:15:23 PM »
His criminal friend said Brueckner used the dark web. There is no other evidence that he did....so no, we don’t know that Brueckner was active on the dark web.
Bury your head in the sand but according to police records (the BKA apparently) he did!... https://youtu.be/IXsXXxRek2Q?t=131
It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1668 on: October 19, 2020, 11:00:21 PM »
Bury your head in the sand but according to police records (the BKA apparently) he did!... https://youtu.be/IXsXXxRek2Q?t=131

Didn’t you hear the words ‘alleged chat room ‘ ?
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1669 on: October 19, 2020, 11:24:14 PM »
Of course if a witness had described  Gerry’s penchant for the dark web, well then we’d never have heard the end of it but because it’s dear old CB we must of course give him the benefit of the doubt and assume anyone speaking out about him is lying for financial gain.
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1670 on: October 21, 2020, 11:03:38 AM »
Of course if a witness had described  Gerry’s penchant for the dark web, well then we’d never have heard the end of it but because it’s dear old CB we must of course give him the benefit of the doubt and assume anyone speaking out about him is lying for financial gain.

Although the lie detector test is a bit controversial on here I could never understand why they didn't take one.

The way they hounded GA as harming the search bla bla.

Wouldnt taking the test have been so much simpler.

They wanted to do everything they could to find her...yet didn't do that.

The one thing IMO that would have cleared them of any involvement as to what happened to Maddie.


y Martin Fricker
21/09/2007

Kate and Gerry McCann are willing to take a lie detector test to clear their names.

The couple are desperate to refocus the hunt for daughter Madeleine, four, as the tide of suspicion against them recedes.

A source said: "They're happy to do anything that will clear them.

"If they were asked to take a lie test by police, they'd agree.

"They've said all along they want to co-operate." Kate and Gerry, both 39, were named suspects two weeks ago. Police believe they may have accidentally overdosed Madeleine and hidden her body.




Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1671 on: October 21, 2020, 12:36:00 PM »
Although the lie detector test is a bit controversial on here I could never understand why they didn't take one.

The way they hounded GA as harming the search bla bla.

Wouldnt taking the test have been so much simpler.

They wanted to do everything they could to find her...yet didn't do that.

The one thing IMO that would have cleared them of any involvement as to what happened to Maddie.


y Martin Fricker
21/09/2007

Kate and Gerry McCann are willing to take a lie detector test to clear their names.

The couple are desperate to refocus the hunt for daughter Madeleine, four, as the tide of suspicion against them recedes.

A source said: "They're happy to do anything that will clear them.

"If they were asked to take a lie test by police, they'd agree.

"They've said all along they want to co-operate." Kate and Gerry, both 39, were named suspects two weeks ago. Police believe they may have accidentally overdosed Madeleine and hidden her body.




What has this got to do with my post?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1672 on: October 21, 2020, 02:03:13 PM »
Although the lie detector test is a bit controversial on here I could never understand why they didn't take one.

The way they hounded GA as harming the search bla bla.

Wouldnt taking the test have been so much simpler.

They wanted to do everything they could to find her...yet didn't do that.

The one thing IMO that would have cleared them of any involvement as to what happened to Maddie.


y Martin Fricker
21/09/2007

Kate and Gerry McCann are willing to take a lie detector test to clear their names.

The couple are desperate to refocus the hunt for daughter Madeleine, four, as the tide of suspicion against them recedes.

A source said: "They're happy to do anything that will clear them.

"If they were asked to take a lie test by police, they'd agree.

"They've said all along they want to co-operate." Kate and Gerry, both 39, were named suspects two weeks ago. Police believe they may have accidentally overdosed Madeleine and hidden her body.





Do you not understand that lie detector tests are unreliable so your claim it would have cleared them is false. I can perfectly understand why they wouldn't take one but in your mind it's evidence of complicity...it isnt

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1673 on: October 21, 2020, 02:15:13 PM »
Do you not understand that lie detector tests are unreliable so your claim it would have cleared them is false. I can perfectly understand why they wouldn't take one but in your mind it's evidence of complicity...it isnt

Just an excuse IMO for the mccs not doing one.

If they were telling the truth why would you think it wouldn't clear them.

Surely it would have been an easier thing to do than spend years and years of going after GA to have his book banned.

I

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1674 on: October 21, 2020, 02:15:52 PM »
What has this got to do with my post?

Sorry Vs I must have quoted you by mistake

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1675 on: October 21, 2020, 02:19:30 PM »
Just an excuse IMO for the mccs not doing one.

If they were telling the truth why would you think it wouldn't clear them.

Surely it would have been an easier thing to do than spend years and years of going after GA to have his book banned.

I

They are unreliable so a pass would not clear them...you are just plain wrong. Why do you think we have courts and trials...why not simply use lie detectors...it's a stupid idea

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1676 on: October 21, 2020, 02:57:44 PM »
They are unreliable so a pass would not clear them...you are just plain wrong. Why do you think we have courts and trials...why not simply use lie detectors...it's a stupid idea

it's a stupid ide
a

Well, it would be to you ...not everyone thinks the same.


Camilla Tominey
Sunday November 18,2007

KATE McCann has done a U-turn over plans to take a lie detector test about daughter Madeleine's disappearance.

She and husband Gerry offered to undergo a polygraph examination in September to clear their names. They hoped it would help to clear up any doubts about their involvement.

Sources close to the couple made it known they were willing to be questioned after Kate was officially declared an "arguido" or official suspect in the case in Portugal.

But despite being approached by a leading UK polygraph expert, mother-of-three Kate, 39, turned down the chance. Don Cargill, chairman of the British And European Polygraph Association, said he was "shocked" by her decision.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1677 on: October 21, 2020, 03:01:07 PM »

it's a stupid ide
a

Well, it would be to you ...not everyone thinks the same.


Camilla Tominey
Sunday November 18,2007

KATE McCann has done a U-turn over plans to take a lie detector test about daughter Madeleine's disappearance.

She and husband Gerry offered to undergo a polygraph examination in September to clear their names. They hoped it would help to clear up any doubts about their involvement.

Sources close to the couple made it known they were willing to be questioned after Kate was officially declared an "arguido" or official suspect in the case in Portugal.

But despite being approached by a leading UK polygraph expert, mother-of-three Kate, 39, turned down the chance. Don Cargill, chairman of the British And European Polygraph Association, said he was "shocked" by her decision.


Everything I've said is 100% fact...then you produce a  tabloid article

Offline kizzy

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1678 on: October 21, 2020, 03:10:31 PM »
Everything I've said is 100% fact...then you produce a  tabloid article

So obviously the mccs have told you why they changed there mind IMO to Know 100%.

Otherwise its only your opinion on why you said they didn't take one.

Offline Lace

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1679 on: October 21, 2020, 03:57:27 PM »

it's a stupid ide
a

Well, it would be to you ...not everyone thinks the same.


Camilla Tominey
Sunday November 18,2007

KATE McCann has done a U-turn over plans to take a lie detector test about daughter Madeleine's disappearance.

She and husband Gerry offered to undergo a polygraph examination in September to clear their names. They hoped it would help to clear up any doubts about their involvement.

Sources close to the couple made it known they were willing to be questioned after Kate was officially declared an "arguido" or official suspect in the case in Portugal.

But despite being approached by a leading UK polygraph expert, mother-of-three Kate, 39, turned down the chance. Don Cargill, chairman of the British And European Polygraph Association, said he was "shocked" by her decision.


I don't know if you watch True Crime it's an American programme with real cases.   They use the polygraph test,  one man they were sure was the person they wanted failed the test,  they thought they had their man,  it wasn't him though as it turned out.   They are not reliable.