Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300399 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1440 on: October 15, 2020, 12:43:58 PM »
Only if one of CB's mate's blabbing is it evidence, but not proof which imo is the sticking point.
It must be part of his 'evidence' at least.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1441 on: October 15, 2020, 12:47:15 PM »
I don't. It's a useless, futile concept without further corroboration.

So if the Portuguese Prosecutor said he had enough evidence to show MM died in the apartment and the parents his the body you wouldnt think that to be significant..

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1442 on: October 15, 2020, 12:50:46 PM »
So if the Portuguese Prosecutor said he had enough evidence to show MM died in the apartment and the parents his the body you wouldnt think that to be significant..
The PP had further corroboration. Your opinion of that corroboration is irrelevant until they decided to use it or not.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1443 on: October 15, 2020, 12:52:17 PM »
The PP had further corroboration. Your opinion of that corroboration is irrelevant until they decided to use it or not.

the PP didnt have enough evidence to show MM died in the apt and here daeth was covered up. We know taht as  a fact

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1444 on: October 15, 2020, 12:52:28 PM »
In my opinion there is nothing which Amaral used as evidence which implicates them from "The Badly Told Story" to Calpol being a sedative to the dogs to the misinterpreted forensic results.

But the prosecutors hit the nail bang on the head when they continued ...

Even if, hypothetically, one could admit that Gerald and Kate McCann might be responsible over the child's death, it would still have to be explained how, where through, when, with what means, with the help of whom and where to they freed themselves of her body within the restricted time frame that would have been available to them to do so.
Their daily routine, until the 3rd of May, had been circumscribed to the narrow borders of the 'Ocean Club' resort and to the beach that lies next to it, unknowing the surrounding terrain and, apart from the English friends that were with them on holiday there, they had no known friends or contacts in Portugal.


Unsurprisingly Amaral could not come up with an answer to that one.  And over the past thirteen+ years neither could anyone else for the simple reason there is no evidence against Gerry and Kate whatsoever.

Well that last bit is untrue as they were provided with additional mobile phones by friends outside the village.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1445 on: October 15, 2020, 12:53:51 PM »
the PP didnt have enough evidence to show MM died in the apt and here daeth was covered up. We know taht as  a fact

Enough being the operative word. I'm glad for once you agree they had some evidence.👍
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline The General

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1446 on: October 15, 2020, 12:54:25 PM »
the PP didnt have enough evidence to show MM died in the apt and here daeth was covered up. We know taht as  a fact
Which is my point. Not enough evidence to proceed further. Seems we're here again.
Subject Matter Expert - Hobos.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1447 on: October 15, 2020, 12:57:28 PM »
Which is my point. Not enough evidence to proceed further. Seems we're here again.

the PP has neevr said he has enough evidence to show MM died in the apartment and the death was covered up

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1448 on: October 15, 2020, 12:59:24 PM »
Enough being the operative word. I'm glad for once you agree they had some evidence.👍
Ive expalined taht many times. The evidence the PJ had showed nothing it was  so weak. The Smith sighting is evidence ...is it enough to show Gerry carried MMs body...no

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1449 on: October 15, 2020, 01:05:21 PM »
Ive expalined taht many times. The evidence the PJ had showed nothing it was  so weak. The Smith sighting is evidence ...is it enough to show Gerry carried MMs body...no
So what Wolters is saying is no more significant than that.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1450 on: October 15, 2020, 01:16:47 PM »
So what Wolters is saying is no more significant than that.

No...best wait till he makes it public

Offline barrier

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1451 on: October 15, 2020, 02:01:57 PM »
No...best wait till he makes it public

Bother,seems to be some sort of accord here,I'm off out to clear me head.
This is my own private domicile and I shall not be harassed, biatch:Jesse Pinkman Character.

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1452 on: October 15, 2020, 02:11:54 PM »

How many Serial Child Sex Abusers and Rapists could there have been wandering around Praia da Luz on the 3rd of May 2007?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1453 on: October 15, 2020, 02:22:34 PM »
How many Serial Child Sex Abusers and Rapists could there have been wandering around Praia da Luz on the 3rd of May 2007?

And who were also known for burglary through windows

Offline Eleanor

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1454 on: October 15, 2020, 02:25:12 PM »
And who were also known for burglary through windows

Yer.  I forgot that bit, although probably more Burglars than Paedophiles and Rapists.