Author Topic: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB  (Read 300315 times)

0 Members and 26 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1470 on: October 15, 2020, 06:03:50 PM »
Even 60 Minutes said it was an ‘alleged’ conversation. Says it all really.

It certainly does...evidence of intent

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1471 on: October 15, 2020, 06:06:28 PM »
How many Serial Child Sex Abusers and Rapists could there have been wandering around Praia da Luz on the 3rd of May 2007?

Not many at all if the witness reports are accurate. Wilkins for example was wandering around blocks 4 and 5 and he only saw Gerry.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1472 on: October 15, 2020, 06:09:39 PM »
Members appear to be of the opinion the place was crawling with them.  Even to the extent that a three year old child was unable to walk a few yards down a road without encountering one or if not that a drunken driver mounting the pavement to get her.

It certainly is true that the area did seem to attract them like flies but I wonder if they were all checked out and eliminated from the inquiry.  Was Brueckner?

Those types prowl around during the day when the kiddies are out. Few come out in the dark.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1473 on: October 15, 2020, 06:10:46 PM »
Those types prowl around during the day when the kiddies are out. Few come out in the dark.

only needs one

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1474 on: October 15, 2020, 06:11:57 PM »
Amaral didn't understand the evidence... fact..

I don't expect the Germans to be so totally inept...we will see

In your opinion.
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Angelo222

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1475 on: October 15, 2020, 06:13:11 PM »
only needs one

Nobody saw one that night so he must be the invisible man too  @)(++(*
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1476 on: October 15, 2020, 06:14:15 PM »
In your opinion.

ive made it clear its my opinion....its a shame other posters ignore the rules

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1477 on: October 15, 2020, 06:16:28 PM »
Nobody saw one that night so he must be the invisible man too  @)(++(*

Oh dear ..

No one esaw Maddie walking down the street looking for her parents did they...but you think that happenend

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1478 on: October 15, 2020, 06:16:41 PM »
Those types prowl around during the day when the kiddies are out. Few come out in the dark.
Expert on the habits of prowling paedos are we?
"You can't reason with the unreasonable".

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1479 on: October 15, 2020, 09:56:41 PM »
Oh dear ..

No one esaw Maddie walking down the street looking for her parents did they...but you think that happenend

Mr and Mrs Moyes were out and about in the immediate area and at a relevant time, but no-one saw them either.
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1480 on: October 15, 2020, 10:54:43 PM »
Mr and Mrs Moyes were out and about in the immediate area and at a relevant time, but no-one saw them either.

Out and about ? I believe that they were sitting on their balcony but will be happy to be corrected.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline Brietta

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1481 on: October 16, 2020, 12:10:22 AM »
Out and about ? I believe that they were sitting on their balcony but will be happy to be corrected.

As I said ... "Mr and Mrs Moyes were out and about in the immediate area and at a relevant time, but no-one saw them either."

Snip
REPORTER Can you take us back to that night and what you were doing and when you first heard there was a problem?

SUSAN MOYES Sure. We went out for a meal about seven o’clock down in the town.

We walked back about nine o’clock,

round past, erm, the church,

round past the supermarket,

back to the apartment.

Went out on the balcony about quarter past nine.

Everywhere was peaceful, everywhere was lovely. We then went to bed.

We were woken up at half past eleven at night by one of the friends of the McCanns to say a little girl had been abducted.

Those were the words she used. So we got dressed and joined in the search. We were out till about four in the morning with, oooh, about I dont know, thirty people, thirty other people maybe.
The Mark Warner team were out with other guests at the Ocean Club.

https://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/t1913-susan-moyes-transcript-radio-stoke-in-2007
"All I'm going to say is that we've conducted a very serious investigation and there's no indication that Madeleine McCann's parents are connected to her disappearance. On the other hand, we have a lot of evidence pointing out that Christian killed her," Wolter told the "Friday at 9"....

Offline faithlilly

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1482 on: October 16, 2020, 12:16:24 AM »
As I said ... "Mr and Mrs Moyes were out and about in the immediate area and at a relevant time, but no-one saw them either."

Snip
REPORTER Can you take us back to that night and what you were doing and when you first heard there was a problem?

SUSAN MOYES Sure. We went out for a meal about seven o’clock down in the town.

We walked back about nine o’clock,

round past, erm, the church,

round past the supermarket,

back to the apartment.

Went out on the balcony about quarter past nine.

Everywhere was peaceful, everywhere was lovely. We then went to bed.

We were woken up at half past eleven at night by one of the friends of the McCanns to say a little girl had been abducted.

Those were the words she used. So we got dressed and joined in the search. We were out till about four in the morning with, oooh, about I dont know, thirty people, thirty other people maybe.
The Mark Warner team were out with other guests at the Ocean Club.

https://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/t1913-susan-moyes-transcript-radio-stoke-in-2007

I think you’re making an assumption that no one saw them.
Brietta posted on 10/04/2022 “But whether or not that is the reason behind the delay I am certain that Brueckner's trial is going to take place.”

Let’s count the months, shall we?

Offline sadie

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1483 on: October 16, 2020, 12:32:15 AM »
Nobody saw one that night so he must be the invisible man too  @)(++(*

Jane Tanner saw Tannerman, who may or may not be a paedo.

The Smiths saw Smithman who possibly might be the same man as Tannerman.  Same man or not, he may , or may not be a pa*do.

So how do you KNOW that nobody saw one that night ?

Pa*dos do not walk around with the words PA*DO blazoned across their chests, you know Angelo.

Offline G-Unit

Re: Is there more circumstantial evidence against the mccanns than there is CB
« Reply #1484 on: October 16, 2020, 12:36:28 AM »
As I said ... "Mr and Mrs Moyes were out and about in the immediate area and at a relevant time, but no-one saw them either."

Snip
REPORTER Can you take us back to that night and what you were doing and when you first heard there was a problem?

SUSAN MOYES Sure. We went out for a meal about seven o’clock down in the town.

We walked back about nine o’clock,

round past, erm, the church,

round past the supermarket,

back to the apartment.

Went out on the balcony about quarter past nine.

Everywhere was peaceful, everywhere was lovely. We then went to bed.

We were woken up at half past eleven at night by one of the friends of the McCanns to say a little girl had been abducted.

Those were the words she used. So we got dressed and joined in the search. We were out till about four in the morning with, oooh, about I dont know, thirty people, thirty other people maybe.
The Mark Warner team were out with other guests at the Ocean Club.

https://maddiemccannmystery.forumotion.co.uk/t1913-susan-moyes-transcript-radio-stoke-in-2007

I wonder if that was Rachel Oldfield? She's the only one who mentioned going up the stairs at all, although she put the time at 10:30pm.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0