Author Topic: Jane Tanner's interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007  (Read 43280 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline John

Jane Tanner's interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« on: April 07, 2013, 08:15:00 PM »
Jane Tanner's interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007


In an exclusive interview with The Sun – her first with any newspaper – Jane forcefully hit back at critics who have suggested she is lying.  Amid sobs, she said: "I DID see a man that night carrying away Madeleine...she WAS abducted."

Tears welling in her eyes, she went on: "I wake up to that image ever day. Every day I see him there, striding away, carrying Madeleine and I try desperately to remember more detail, what his face was like. "I think about it over and over again. It’s horrible...Madeleine was adorable. Every day I hope this is the day we find her."

Twisting her Look For Madeleine yellow and green wristbands, Jane, 36, then went into detail about the night of 3 May.  She told how she and the other members of the so-called Tapas Nine had been leaving the restaurant at the complex in Praia da Luz to check their children.

It was on one of her visits to see her two daughters that Jane passed Maddie’s dad Gerry, 39.  He was returning from seeing his children.  Seconds later she saw a man cross from left to right in front of her with a child lolling back in his arms.   Jane said: "It wasn’t unusual to see people with children, even at that time of night. But my attention was drawn to him because the child had bare feet...it was a cold night and I thought that was strange because as a mother I would never have taken my child around at that time without something on their feet or a blanket.  All I could see of the child was their legs dangling...the man was about ten to fifteen feet in front of me and was walking quite quickly and I can remember thinking, 'That’s odd'...but that was all, nothing to make me scream out to make him stop. I never at that time thought it could be Madeleine.  I’d just passed Gerry so I thought his children were all asleep in bed."

Jane carried on to her apartment where she found her daughters were fine so she went back to the tapas bar.  About 15 minutes later her partner Dr Russell O’Brien checked and found one of the girls had been sick so he asked a friend to fetch Jane.  It was while Jane was there that Maddie’s mum Kate, 39, went to see her children at around 10.05pm – and found the girl missing.

Jane said the first she knew was when she looked out of her window and saw the table at the tapas bar was empty. She opened the door and there was commotion.   She said: "I saw all our friends outside shouting. I opened the door and one, Rachael, shouted at me, 'Madeleine’ s gone!' As soon as she said that the image of that man carrying the child came into my head and I felt physically sick.  A feeling of complete horror washed over me."

Minutes later Jane saw Kate. Close to tears, Jane admitted she could not bear to tell her about the man.  She said: "At that time it seemed everyone thought Madeleine was hiding.  I knew that if I told her about the man it would shatter that.  I was also hoping desperately that I’d been wrong.  Instead I took another friend, Fiona, to one side and told her...then, at around 11.15, two policemen arrived and I told them.  Later CID arrived."
« Last Edit: April 07, 2013, 08:20:16 PM by John »
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

amaraltheofficeboy

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #1 on: April 07, 2013, 08:17:25 PM »
a lot of stories in those days weren't there

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #2 on: April 07, 2013, 08:20:15 PM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #3 on: April 08, 2013, 07:29:28 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Using the Sun or other media is trustworthy depending on what is being said and how it is sourced. If someone gives a voluntary interview and doesnot later complain, then that may be seen as a fair view of what that person believed at that point.

WHat is reprehensible is using stories based on biased leaks as indications of truth as HiDeHo regularly does in her videos where the headline or content has been proved very wrong by later facts.

Offline Admin

Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2013, 09:10:02 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.

Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #5 on: April 08, 2013, 09:14:57 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.

Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.


I rarely buy a newpaper except on the very odd occasion admin and I find the article very useful and enlightening.  I have read so much about Jane Tanner, much of it extremely cruel and disgusting, thus I am glad that this has been posted.  It is an excellent interview.   8@??)(  8@??)(
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #6 on: April 08, 2013, 09:16:45 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.

Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.


Compelling, a sob story yes.

There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.

As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.

Offline Admin

Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #7 on: April 08, 2013, 09:21:01 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.

Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.


Compelling, a sob story yes.

There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.

As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.


Just one question Stephen, why on earth would someone concoct such a story given the circumstances and as a consequence open them-self up to criticism such as posted by yourself?

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2013, 09:26:42 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.

Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.



Compelling, a sob story yes.

There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.



As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.

There can be no proof that she saw anything. But this article does show what she said at the time.

DIfferent weight can be llaced on the value of stories depending upon the circumstances.

YOu are verging on paranoid as well as being grossly biased and hypocritical.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2013, 09:29:11 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.

Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.


Compelling, a sob story yes.

There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.

As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.


Just one question Stephen, why on earth would someone concoct such a story given the circumstances and as a consequence open them-self up to criticism such as posted by yourself?

Simple.

To try and give credence to an abduction, for which there is not one smattering of evidence.

Remember all these people left their children unattended whilst in the Tapas Bar.

For that they are tarred with the same brush.

Would you have left children, very young children in such a situation in a country where you were merely a visitor on holiday ?

The irony being of course that G. Mccann and his associate could not remember seeing her there at the time she claimed.

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #10 on: April 08, 2013, 09:31:31 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.

Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.



Compelling, a sob story yes.

There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.



As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.

There can be no proof that she saw anything. But this article does show what she said at the time.

DIfferent weight can be llaced on the value of stories depending upon the circumstances.

YOu are verging on paranoid as well as being grossly biased and hypocritical.


Of course you would say that, I would expect no less.

As to paranoia no, observant yes.

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2013, 09:33:12 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.


Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.


Compelling, a sob story yes.



There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.

As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.


Just one question Stephen, why on earth would someone concoct such a story given the circumstances and as a consequence open them-self up to criticism such as posted by yourself?



Simple.

To try and give credence to an abduction, for which there is not one smattering of evidence



Remember all these people left their children unattended whilst in the Tapas Bar.

For that they are tarred with the same brush.



Would you have left children, very young children in such a situation in a country where you were merely a visitor on holiday ?

The irony being of course that G. Mccann and his associate could not remember seeing her there at the time she claimed.

ANd that is your whole argument:

"I hate the McCanns and therefore they are guilty; sentence first, trial later."

stephen25000

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #12 on: April 08, 2013, 09:37:11 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.


Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.


Compelling, a sob story yes.



There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.

As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.


Just one question Stephen, why on earth would someone concoct such a story given the circumstances and as a consequence open them-self up to criticism such as posted by yourself?



Simple.

To try and give credence to an abduction, for which there is not one smattering of evidence



Remember all these people left their children unattended whilst in the Tapas Bar.

For that they are tarred with the same brush.



Would you have left children, very young children in such a situation in a country where you were merely a visitor on holiday ?

The irony being of course that G. Mccann and his associate could not remember seeing her there at the time she claimed.

ANd that is your whole argument:

"I hate the McCanns and therefore they are guilty; sentence first, trial later."


You're the one using that language again.

As so often, the 'mccannites' are so predictable.


debunker

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanners interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #13 on: April 08, 2013, 09:52:46 AM »
Are we using  'The Sun'  as a source of reference now

Why ever not?   This interview is an excellent reference as to what a principal witness saw first hand on the night of Madeleine's disappearance.  Statements tend to morph over time and are usually in a language which most people find alien.  A warts and all
interview with a Sun reporter on the other hand is something which can provide an interesting insight into what happened that morning.


Having read this article for the very first time, I must say I find it compelling.




Compelling, a sob story yes.



There is no proof Tanner saw a thing.


As to the Sun, hardly a neutral voice, bearing in mind they have supported the Mccanns throughout and paid for the serialization rights for the book.

Next please.




Just one question Stephen, why on earth would someone concoct such a story given the circumstances and as a consequence open them-self up to criticism such as posted by yourself?




Simple.

To try and give credence to an abduction, for which there is not one smattering of evidence




Remember all these people left their children unattended whilst in the Tapas Bar.

For that they are tarred with the same brush.




Would you have left children, very young children in such a situation in a country where you were merely a visitor on holiday ?



The irony being of course that G. Mccann and his associate could not remember seeing her there at the time she claimed.

ANd that is your whole argument:




"I hate the McCanns and therefore they are guilty; sentence first, trial later."




You're the one using that language again.

As so often, the 'mccannites' are so predictable.

It is you exhibiting the bias. I am quite happy to entertain the theory that the McCanns were involved in harming Madeleine, but that there is no convincing evidence for that. I also see no convincing evidence for abduction. I also consider woke and wandered is possible.

NOw, can you honestly say that you give equal credence to the possibility of all three options.

That will be a test of who is neutral!

debunker

  • Guest
Re: Jane Tanner's interview with The Sun on 20 November 2007
« Reply #14 on: April 08, 2013, 10:20:46 AM »
He won't explain. He never debates.