"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Where in chapter one, Ms lean informs her readers that the police were "monitoring"  her phone? - as above, and spot on the money "crazy conspiracy theorist".

 

[Nicholas]

Now for the actual book, to run through chapter by chapter. A brief conclusion of opinion, based on that invitation by Ms Lean. "To make of it what you will?"

Parky have you considered using the content of your posts to publish your own book on this quite apparent innocence fraud?

[Nicholas]

Clever? Manipulative - definitely.

For me Sandra Lean is most definitely an emotionally manipulative individual

I also consider her behaviour to be a blatant attack on [Name removed]’s family and indeed [Name removed]’s memory

[Nicholas]

Now for the actual book, to run through chapter by chapter. A brief conclusion of opinion, based on that invitation by Ms Lean. "To make of it what you will?"

The introduction from page 13:

"Truth seeking is a precarious and often maligned pursuit. To be labelled a crazy conspiracy theorist, interfering do-gooder, fame seeker, evil bitch, murderer lover, sicko......these are the reactions of many who are afraid of the truth.That fear is understandable"

Sandra Lean is also most defiantly not a ‘do gooder’

[Nicholas]

Innocents Betrayed: - My follow up to "Make of it what you will"

Chapter 1 ......Why Bother?

P 25-26

To add insult to injury, a former online supporter of Luke suddenly changed tack and became a strident critic of the case and those involved in fighting it. It would be several years before I realised there are people whose favourite pastime is scouring the internet for people to attack - they take some form of warped delight from spewing their hate-filled nonsense everywhere they can."

Yes I suspect she does

"I watched in horror as lie after lie spread across the internet like a filthy oil slick.”

She’s unreal isn’t she 

Threats began to emerge - to post my home address and pictures of my house - to publish my daughters' names and pictures - to expose "the truth" about me (that one actually made me laugh - how many people would be interested in two divorces and some parking tickets)?

I wasn’t aware Sandra Lean has been married twice - I was only aware of her marriage to KL whom I was under the impression is the biological father of both daughters

So was Sandra also married to Simon - the man she referred to as ‘a psychopath’ - ‘Simon’ who she acknowledged at the beginning of her book ‘No Smoke’? ⬇️

Sandra Lean went on to refer to the “Simon” she gave a dedication to in her book ‘No Smoke as a “psychopath.”

.....and to Skooby, Chi, Caz and Simon

[Parky41]

And to finish off from - Why Bother? - The conspiracy:

"I'd known for some time that my phone was being monitored and I didn't want them knowing where I was. Someone had given Jodi's brother my address - they could easily disclose where I was hiding - If they knew! Thankfully this was before mobile phones became fitted with GPS as standard"

So this is around 2010 -12. Around the time of the WAP for Ms Lean claims this male told her to take the website down. Where Ms Lean is inferring, not really inferring, saying that she was being monitored by the police/media? That they had passed out information to Jodi's brother of where she stayed? Firstly Ms Lean in her intro tells us of the mining cottage she stayed in. Recently renovated - this is in 2003. So long gone from wherever that was, which had to be Newtongrange or Easthouse's. The only two areas with mining cottages, close enough to the school her daughters attended.  But really, this woman who was running a website in favour of Mitchell was being monitored and information passed over - hogwash.

They stayed in the same area, AW had been the postwoman of this area for many years. The Jones/Walker family stayed in several parts of this area. It would not have been difficult at all to know where Ms Lean stayed. We are talking a small community here, not something in the scale of Dalkeith and so forth.

But as stated, it paves the way, sows those seeds that set the path to follow as the book proceeds. Of the police, of the brother, of paying no heed to anything that may be said, that fear of the truth. One can tie them together. - Into that clear talk of conspiracy.

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean

Threats began to emerge - to post my home address and pictures of my house - to publish my daughters' names and pictures - to expose "the truth" about me

Is there factual evidence of the above ?

With regards Sandra Leans daughters names - her youngest daughter ‘Ellie’ regularly posted on a previous forum and if I recall made everyone aware of who she was ?!

[Nicholas]

Innocents Betrayed: - My follow up to "Make of it what you will"

Chapter 1 ......Why Bother?

P 25-26
This had followed the introduction of the WAP forum to the book, that first thwart on the tabloids, running stories of deluded supporters and the comments section vile in it's response, where one yet again get's that clear impression of worth that Ms Lean places upon herself. Where she tells her readers that every action, every involvement was at a cost to herself. One of the first of many misconceptions. Where everything in it's nature, at the very core of it, is, completely OTT. As above, that need to exaggerate, to blow something out of proportion. For any who knew of it at the time, the WAP forum was rotten to it's very core.

As was/is Billy Middleton imo.

And I remain of the firm view the verdict of not proven in the murder of baby Annalise (9 months old) was a miscarriage of justice.

http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=8545.msg428365#msg428365

[Nicholas]

Innocents Betrayed: - My follow up to "Make of it what you will"

Chapter 1 ......Why Bother?

P 25-26
This had followed the introduction of the WAP forum to the book, that first thwart on the tabloids, running stories of deluded supporters and the comments section vile in it's response, where one yet again get's that clear impression of worth that Ms Lean places upon herself. Where she tells her readers that every action, every involvement was at a cost to herself.

The ‘eternal victim’ ⬇️ 🙄

‘
I have a little troll
I’ve had her now for years
She skulks around the net
Peddling lies and hate and fear
It’s really just as well
I’m not the jealous kind
She has so many targets
I can hardly call her “mine.”
Turns lies to truth and truth to lies
She really has no shame
She’s the eternal victim, though
She never is to blame

[Nicholas]

  "Everything you read in this book has been taken from the defence papers, information in the media, or was discovered by witnesses who came forward long after the case ended - anything that is missing was also missing from the defence files."

‘Witnesses’ like Scott Forbes 

[Nicholas]

And we go further into that manipulation, of sowing seeds and that clear contradictory account of Jodi's brother visiting Ms Lean. Where she gives the impression of fear, of a lad threatening to kill her her. In daytime, in the middle of a council housing scheme, where her house is surrounded and looked onto by many others. So terrified is Ms Lean, she does not shut her door, she does not tell him to leave her property, she does not instantly tell him she is going to call the police. She keeps him talking. She offers to go fetch those defence papers to show him he is wrong. She tells the readers he believed she was home alone (telepathy). Let us be completely honest here, that whole rotten account stinks of over exaggerated nonsense, does it not? For not one sensible action was carried out to merit what she is claiming happened.

I wouldn’t trust her stories

[Nicholas]

That Ms Lean then adds the police, of her phone being monitored, of taking herself into her campervan out of fear!? Ok, really? Away from the safety of brick and mortar! to the tin of a van, in a car park alone.

I wasn’t aware she had a ‘campervan’ around that time?!?

Was she referring to that old post office van she purchased after she allegedly had to get rid of her BMW?

I remember having been in Sandra Leans old post office van (it most certainly wasn’t a camper van!) with Brigitte Butcher (Killer Kevin Nunn’s sister) - Billy Middleton was driving.

[Nicholas]

And to finish off from - Why Bother? - The conspiracy:

So this is around 2010 -12. Around the time of the WAP for Ms Lean claims this male told her to take the website down. Where Ms Lean is inferring, not really inferring, saying that she was being monitored by the police/media? That they had passed out information to Jodi's brother of where she stayed? Firstly Ms Lean in her intro tells us of the mining cottage she stayed in. Recently renovated - this is in 2003. So long gone from wherever that was, which had to be Newtongrange or Easthouse's. The only two areas with mining cottages, close enough to the school her daughters attended.  But really, this woman who was running a website in favour of Mitchell was being monitored and information passed over - hogwash.

Complete and utterly

[John]

I know some posters have a lot of background information about SL and her exploits with the gentleman from Shetland but it is irrelevant to the case of Luke Mitchell.

Please stay on topic. TY

[Dexter]

I know some posters have a lot of background information about SL and her exploits with the gentleman from Shetland but it is irrelevant to the case of Luke Mitchell.

Please stay on topic. TY

Very true.