I'll endeavour to spend some reading through it. Your Innocence Fraud work.
On another note and still very much in line with Innocence Fraud and of your other link around narcissism and the blame game. Firstly of course LM that manipulator who was of course outsmarted by the police which in turn will have him never admit guilt. He will forever manipulate in his attempt to prove himself smarter, superior and intellectually above. And those clear similar natures who do the exact same. Every action is carried out in that attempt to place themselves intellectually above all else. That each and every action should it cause harm to others is by fault of others. That 'they made me do it' syndrome. IF the police had did this, IF the law was like this - --
By far the biggest give away in that attempt to place themselves as simply superior is that repetition of - The defence had their hands tied so tightly behind their back that they caught fast the zip one has placed up it.
Ah yes, manipulators where of course Mr Forbes is being used by Mitchell for another purpose, does not quite hit the mark of manipulation out with being manipulated by Mitchell to do his bidding, but certainly has that drive to be noticed and to be correct. I have absolutely no idea where 'planet fantasy' is but the population has found itself a new leader!
I neither have any idea what he is professionally (cough), perhaps Dexter can shed some light? It does not however matter for he brings with him excellent news. That there was not likely to have been nor never will be some wonderful new legal team of bodies reviewing Mitchells case, far less doing anything with it. That other front of course in this plight for support to push for an independent review, is of course just that. These people know there is not chance in hell of this happening, they know that every form of manipulation, those lies and accusations may fool some, but they will never fool those where it actually counts. Proper intellectual bodies who will first and foremost look at everything that has already come to pass before even considering such a thing. And the actions of the accusers of course, that every single thing that they are hiding and burying can not be hidden nor buried, from again, people that actually count.
Further excellent news is of course around Mitchells latest actions, for they are his. Carrying out in part what he claimed was going to happen last year, that of releasing certain areas from his defence papers. Not of course that which should and could always have been released legally (the hiding of the truth will remain so), but anything legal or otherwise to use in this attack upon innocent people. The complete opposite of what Mitchell fronted last year, of not wanting others to be treated as he was (claimed).
Whilst there is no longer any legal requirement to admit guilt thus carry out any rehabilitation against offence, there has to be that of exemplary character and of victim empathy courses. Mitchell given Forbes his defence papers to use anything illegally to attack innocent people, victims family and so forth - Will place Mitchell still in that high risk category. It is just under two years until that first application can be placed with the parole board, where is LM just now? Certainly not in an open prison or well under way to being rehabilitated for life on the outside, is he? And these latest actions and attempts of solely given someone his defence papers to breach laws is not going to fair well, is it?
A final thought for now. So those who have joined this support who are still NOT requesting that everything that could and should have been legally disclosed, should be done. Every single thing pertaining directly to LM and his mother. Every single word of every statement/interview along with CM's full court testimony. But there is also something else here and that of funding and what you are being told It could be used for. Here is something that it should already have been used for, stemming back to the days of the WAP, from funds obtained then.
But let us run through who first of all has had anything to do with the original forensics, those tests and results. We start with the experts who first carried these out. We move to the police who had expert advice on each and every test and report. We move to the Crown and more of the same then we move to Mitchells defence. Everything in order and labelled correctly. These team of professional bodies who deal with forensics and reports, day in and out, year after year. People who have the type of grasp on such things that us mere mortals could only dream of having. DF and any expert advice he was given and the agreement he DID make with the Crown.
We move on to SL and those claims of them being in a mess, that it took years to try and match samples to the correct report, different labs and labelling and so forth. With me so far? That application into the SCCRC who in turn had experts in their field (independent), review those original tests and results, advised and carried out testing from their expertise on viable areas to test! They go back to Mitchell, to SL and she still claims they were in a mess, that by the time of IB going to print that she had still NOT managed to match every sample to the correct report!
Bypass the manipulation, that need to play dumb for purpose of said manipulation, ok? You the supporters have ploughed your monies in. All you need is permission from the person you are supporting, namely Luke Mitchell. No major red tape. Pay for an independent expert in the field of forensics to sort, match, review in full those original tests and further ones by the SCCRC, then get this independent person to give a full independent review of their findings!
In short, everything that could and should already have been done should be done. You are repeatedly told those words over and over. If there is nothing to hide, if there is nothing to be afraid of? - Get those statements, every word of them out there and get those forensics independently reviewed. You seek the truth well get it out there and start again. Not that you of course do not believe Ms Lean nor Mr Forbes, nor Mitchell of course. But be real, there is NOT going to be a new full independent review. This is 2022 and you are being had! Re-testing? This is NOT a cold case, items are NOT retained for ever. I would very much doubt there was anything there in 2018 when that begging bowl first went out, this is 2022 - wake up.
