An Ana Azaria has posted the following on Facebook
What the jury didn’t know (part 1)
“The role of the jury, is to reach a verdict in the case, having heard and considered the facts according to the evidence and the instructions given by the judge. There are 15 people in a criminal jury trial and 12 in a civil jury trial. (scotcourts.gov).”
But, how can a jury make a decision, based on all of the facts, when all of the facts have not been provided?
The DNA sample reports stated that samples 336A and 336B – taken from the trousers that Luke wore on the night of the murder – returned a mixed result, showing both Luke and an unknown female. The jury were not made aware of this – and the female was not Jodi. Some have tried to suggest that because the female profile was unknown, that it could have been Jodi – but some of the markers in the unknown profile were not in the same place as Jodi’s.
The jury seemed to accept in other areas, that Luke could have removed every trace of himself from the crime scene, while leaving the DNA of others. But without the above information, they could not question how he was able to remove DNA from Jodi from his trousers, without also removing the DNA of himself, and another female.
#whatthejurydidntknow
*disclaimer - please refrain from discussing the jury at all - these posts are simply to point out the information that they were not given, thank you*
Ana Azalia fails to point out the fact that [Name removed]’s had spent the day with other females at school and lived with another female, and they fail to highlight the fact the DNA could have transferred to the trousers by secondary transfer
