"Innocents Betrayed " by Sandra Lean

[Nicholas]

Where does Rachel Quinn’s evidence factor into Sandra leans latest nonsense?

“Jodi's pal Rachel Quinn tells the court she used to speak to her on the school bus on the way home.

She says: 'She used to tell me that whenever she went to Luke's house, her mum liked Luke to meet her either at the top of the path or half way.'

[Nicholas]

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=fqQ7lnucUMI

He would have virtually had to step over the body on the down and one the way back

  

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean told James English the police contaminated the crime scene “really really badly” so new DNA tests are futile

[Nicholas]

“I know there’s no avoiding causing more pain to Jodi’s family I know that..” Sandra Lean to .James English 2019

 

[Nicholas]

“I mindful as a mum of girls…”   Sandra Lean to James English 2019

 

What a malignant narcissist 

 

[Nicholas]

Ms Lean’s two daughters had a father - a father who would have also been ‘on guard and worried’ yes?

Where were Sandra Leans daughters living in 2003?

Wouldn’t the girls father have had the same ‘drive to make sure the police have gotten the right man’ ?

Has Sandra Lean’s answered these questions yet?

Where were each of daughters living back then and what were their fathers thoughts on Sandra Lean’s involvement ?

[Nicholas]

Part 114
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/03/killer-luke-mitchell-whats-the-connection-part-114/

Part 115
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/11/03/killer-luke-mitchell-a-brief-conclusion-of-opinion-on-sandra-leans-2nd-book-guest-blog-part-115/

[Nicholas]

I wasn’t aware Sandra Lean has been married twice - I was only aware of her marriage to KL whom I was under the impression is the biological father of both daughters

So was Sandra also married to Simon - the man she referred to as ‘a psychopath’ - ‘Simon’ who she acknowledged at the beginning of her book ‘No Smoke’? ⬇️

Are Sandra Lean’s daughters half sisters?

And is this why one of them didn’t live with her?

[Nicholas]

And to finish off from - Why Bother? - The conspiracy:

So this is around 2010 -12. Around the time of the WAP for Ms Lean claims this male told her to take the website down. Where Ms Lean is inferring, not really inferring, saying that she was being monitored by the police/media? That they had passed out information to Jodi's brother of where she stayed? Firstly Ms Lean in her intro tells us of the mining cottage she stayed in. Recently renovated - this is in 2003. So long gone from wherever that was, which had to be Newtongrange or Easthouse's. The only two areas with mining cottages, close enough to the school her daughters attended.  But really, this woman who was running a website in favour of Mitchell was being monitored and information passed over - hogwash.

They stayed in the same area, AW had been the postwoman of this area for many years. The Jones/Walker family stayed in several parts of this area. It would not have been difficult at all to know where Ms Lean stayed. We are talking a small community here, not something in the scale of Dalkeith and so forth.

But as stated, it paves the way, sows those seeds that set the path to follow as the book proceeds. Of the police, of the brother, of paying no heed to anything that may be said, that fear of the truth. One can tie them together. - Into that clear talk of conspiracy.

Did her daughters attend the same schools ?

If one lived with their father - would this daughter not have gone to the School in the area he lived in?

[Nicholas]

Does anyone recall the time Colin Bowman stated *(on one of the forums) Stephanie Hall’s relationship with John Lamberton was “dangerous’?

Not that her relationship with killer Simon Hall would be ‘dangerous’ for her

Colin Bowman specifically referred to John L

 

[Nicholas]

Ana Azaria
 Juj did go to the scene; she ran to the path after finding out that a body had been found, where she was intercepted by police. Juj said that she had been made aware of the body being found via a (26 second) phone call phone call to AW at 11.53pm. She said that her sister (Juj’s sister) had answered AW’s phone and given her the news - but 11.53pm is before the police had radioed that a body had been found and before the search party were taken to the carpark where Juj’s sister had turned up, so it’s unclear how AW could have handed her phone to Juj’s sister in order for her to answer it. 
The others from the search party were taken back to Juj’s house (after the police station) but Juj and AO stayed at Newbattle police station for questioning. Luke was taken to a different police station for questioning, and as we know, was the only one forensically searched and asked to remove his clothing.

Sandra Lean(around a week ago)
Ana Azaria Gail Lafferty - Brace yourselves, guys, another mind fry coming up!!!
Firstly, there are 2 accounts of those in Jodi's mother's house getting to the car park that night.
In the first, as soon as JuJ was given the news, she ran screaming from the house, along the entrance lane to the path, and was intercepted at the junction of the paths by a police officer who led her to the car park, noting, as he did, that she was "unsteady on her feet." (The reason I add that last bit is to show the officer was noting specific details of the event). At this point, there is mention in other statements of AO and [Name removed] being in the car park, but no detail of how they got there. The police officer makes no mention of anyone else being with, or behind JuJ at the junction of the paths.
In the second version, it is [Name removed] who runs screaming from the house and onto the entrance lane to the path, with JuJ and AO following. There is nothing in the files to support this version - only one person is noted coming along the entrance lane to the junction and that is JuJ.
BUT, hidden away in the papers is another little snippet of information - there was a manned police car parked outside JuJ's house at that time - one officer radioed in his arrival at the address, in the car, at around 11.50pm. Yet, there are no statements from either of the officers in the car to say who left the house, why they didn't try to stop them, etc.

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
What's even more shocking about all this car park/police station stuff is that while Luke was removed from the car park pretty much immediately, Jodi's family members were left there for almost 2 hours, while the police decided what to do with them.
During that time, it now appears, other people were arriving (and potentially leaving) - people reported to have been in the car park during that almost 2 hour period are: AO, [Name removed], JuJ, AW, JaJ, SK, DI, AP (the aunts), and at least two other male family members, one who may have arrived with the aunts - it's not entirely clear from the statements and one who arrived at some point after the aunts and after the search trio were taken up to the car park. That's 7 people, in addition to the search trio, all of whom were talking to each other, calling others on phones, being in close proximity to the searchers, etc.
It's not even clear how many of the additional 7 were taken to the Newbattle Station before being sent to JuJ's house without any information being taken from them, or if the search trio were among those taken to the station in the first place. It SEEMS they were, but it's far from definitive that all three of them actually were.

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean told James English the police contaminated the crime scene “really really badly” so new DNA tests are futile

Ana Azaria
Jen O Donnell Hi Jen, absolutely, the case is full of inconsistencies! The legal wall - that's a good way to describe it. It's not maybe so much getting over it, but more like we are having to chip away at it. Basically, for a retrial to be considered there would need to be 'new evidence'. But - any evidence which was known but not used at the initial trial, doesn't count. For example, there was various pieces of information not provided to the defence (some until 10 years after Luke's conviction), or looked at, or used (the limited time the defence had didn't help)- but it doesn't count, because although it wasn't used - it was 'known'. The defence can only also respond to what the prosecution put forward and the defence are limited with funds and access to information. The prosecution could use the same information again and although it could be better argued now? the defence may still face similar barriers.
But – it's not all bad news. We have been focusing on an independent review which could potentially allow evidence to be looked at again and the investigation itself to be looked at – and items released for testing and retesting. DNA technology has advanced a fair bit since 2003 and if these items were tested again, it could give us the new evidence needed. We hit 25k on the petition for the review just a few weeks ago and have been asking people to write to their MSPs in Scotland. The petition will be handed over to parliament along with a silent vigil. We will be updating everyone with a date when it’s confirmed. Thank you for taking an interest and please feel free to have a look around the page and ask any questions.

The police contaminated the crime scene ‘really really badly’ Ana Azalia

And the last ‘silent vigil’ didn’t go down too well

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/scottish-news/families-of-killers-hijack-silent-walk-1000587

[Nicholas]

Ana Azaria (Yesterday)
Avril Lamb Hi Avril, Dr Lean has access to the case files and all of the statements from the investigation that were made available to the defence

 

“Sandra Lean (27th June 2021)
So on Wednesday the 30th of June after the case papers have been collected I will no longer be associated with Luke’s case in any professional capacity because decisions taken about the direction of the campaign can’t be reconciled with the work that I do
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/07/04/transcript-of-sandra-leans-27th-june-2021-live-facebook-video-exit-speech/

 

Enter fantasist, abuser and pretend lawyer Scott Charles Forbes

 

“Scott Forbes (October 2022)
Firstly, I have to thank Sandra Lean for the literally thousands of hours of consultations, fact checking, and painfully going over old ground. Without, the book would not have been possible.

“Mothers & Sons
The relationship between a mother and her son is a special one”

Cruel and callous abuser Corinne Mitchell was (and is) an adoptee

There has been no mention anywhere, ever of Corinne Mitchell’s adoption and the impact this had on her ‘special’ relationship with her son(s)

Why?

How many adopted parents of individuals convicted of murder did Scott C Forbes speak to, if any?


Scott Forbes stated;

“Judith Jones (JuJ) openly admitted that she lied and covered for her son, Joseph ([Name removed])”

Yet cruel and callous Corinne Mitchell claimed to have never ever lied for her son(s)

 

[Nicholas]

“Sandra Lean (27th June 2021)
So on Wednesday the 30th of June after the case papers have been collected I will no longer be associated with Luke’s case in any professional capacity because decisions taken about the direction of the campaign can’t be reconciled with the work that I do
https://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2021/07/04/transcript-of-sandra-leans-27th-june-2021-live-facebook-video-exit-speech/

Sandra Lean
“I knew decisions were being taken about the direction of the campaign but not anything like what was said in the statement

And still this cowardly, sadistic killer wouldn’t publish his and his cruel and callous mothers statements and transcripts

And his lying brother Shane Mitchell - who claimed he had memory problems related to the day his younger brother killed [Name removed] - because of drug addiction